开云体育

Ok, then maybe you should get the USB scope. Because that is working a thousand times better than a soundcard - litterally, 50Msps instead of 50ksps. Working a million times better than the HP scope

Interesting, hadn't seen that before. Shawn --- Norm Carlberg <normnet@...> wrote: http://www.bkprecision.com/www/np_searchmodel7.asp?lf=Digital%2FAnalog+Oscilloscopes Shawn Upton, KB1CKT

Well, I guess these PC Based scopes aint all bad! I have been downloading and trying some of the really cheap (AKA FREE) ones that use the computer's sound card. I made up a little "Gizmo" type

Analog/Digital Storage Oscilloscopes http://www.bkprecision.com/www/np_searchmodel7.asp?lf=Digital%2FAnalog+Oscilloscopes Norm

At work, we don't trim email--we have "unlimited" bandwidth, and so nothing needs to be trimmed. Presumably so we can properly assign blame or take CYA action, without having to search for old emails.

Seconded. That's where I forwarded that post from, and there are a lot of very knowledgable people in there... -- Member of the toughest, meanest, deadliest, most unrelenting -- and ablest -- form of

Who would want a scope that only does 200 milliHertz? <grin> Shawn --- "Roy J. Tellason" <rtellason@...> wrote: <snip> Shawn Upton, KB1CKT __________________________________________________ Do

Lately, I've taken to soldering 50 ohm coax to low voltage signal stuff, then I can actually see mV stuff instead of real fuzzy "I think it's a 5mV swing but with 30mVpp of noise". That's assuming

Agreed. I am no novice, and sampling artifacts get me regularly. I often use the analog scope to see what is "really going on". But I also agree the ease of making measurements with a digital scope is

This is not necessarily a good assumption... <...> We can talk about fixing that offlist, if you like. -- Member of the toughest, meanest, deadliest, most unrelenting -- and ablest -- form of life in

Ahyup, DSO's can be problematic with aliasing and outright "hiding" of stuff. On the other hand, they are great with non-repetitive signals. And serious headscratching stuff, where you run something

I agree with that! Especially with very fast irregular signals which i can't quite figure out i'll go to the analog scope to see "what's really there". You'll also sometimes get sampling artefacts

Yes, it is going to be very practical to look at measurements 5 meters away, a lot of running around, it's supposed to be good for your health ;-). Been there, done that, because the scope was too

First thing to do is look at some known signals with your HP scope. It may have an internal square wave generator for self-checking. You can also always depend on the 60 cycle sine wave from the power

<jgeidl@...> wrote: units, you don't I stand my Tek 485 vertically on the floor. I slide it under the table when I don't need it and slide it out (and over to one side) when I do. My workspace has 3

I have a recent model Tek digital color scope. It is an amazing instrument, especially when it comes to making quantitative measurements. Nevertheless, I have a love-hate relationship with the lil

<leon.heller@...> wrote: scope would scopes. doesn't

Discounting consideration for some future researcher trying to use the nearly worthless Yahoo archives, I am still at a loss to understand why anybody prefers bottom posting on a reflector mailing

for real time sampling, yes. ST

Darn it, I really have to think this all through very carefully. For my imediate needs, I am 98.322544321% sure that PC based scope would work for me - short term. BUT, at $300.00, I am nearing the