开云体育

MOU0001 on the NEOCP

Maik Meyer All Messages By This Member #33092 Hello all, I want to point out the object MOU0001 on the NEOCP. My parabolic solution looks very interesting - intrinsically faint but very close approach to Earth in January. Of course, this is based on just 18 hours of arc, so more observations are needed, to see how close to the truth it is. Maik -- "One cannot discover comets lying in bed." * Lewis Swift ________________________________________________________________________ *** @skymorph.bsky.social
Alan Hale All Messages By This Member #33093 开云体育 Hi Maik, all, ? I just took some images with LCO-Tenerife, and was unable to detect any moving objects down to magnitude ~19 within a 5x5 arcminute field centered on the predicted ephemeris position. ? ? Sincerely, Alan ? Hello all, ? I want to point out the object MOU0001 on the NEOCP. ? My parabolic solution looks very interesting - intrinsically faint but very close approach to Earth in January. Of course, this is based on just 18 hours of arc, so more observations are needed, to see how close to the truth it is. ? Maik -- "One cannot discover comets lying in bed." * Lewis Swift ________________________________________________________________________ ? *** @skymorph.bsky.social ? ? ? ? ? ?
Maik Meyer All Messages By This Member #33094 开云体育 Alan, many thanks for this information. I really thought that the second tracklet was a good confirmation, and this was the reason for my message, but now it seems it might still be questionable. Maik Sent from my mobile 11.12.2024 21:52:28 Alan Hale <ahale@...>: toggle quoted message Show quoted text Hi Maik, all, ? I just took some images with LCO-Tenerife, and was unable to detect any moving objects down to magnitude ~19 within a 5x5 arcminute field centered on the predicted ephemeris position. ? ? Sincerely, Alan ? Hello all, ? I want to point out the object MOU0001 on the NEOCP. ? My parabolic solution looks very interesting - intrinsically faint but very close approach to Earth in January. Of course, this is based on just 18 hours of arc, so more observations are needed, to see how close to the truth it is. ? Maik -- "One cannot discover comets lying in bed." * Lewis Swift ________________________________________________________________________ ? *** @skymorph.bsky.social ? ? ? ? ? ?
Alan Hale All Messages By This Member #33095 开云体育 Hi Maik, all, ? I’d still encourage anyone else to have a go at this. Theoretically, it could be “there” but faint, or several arcmin away from the ephemeris position and I somehow missed it, but in any event I wouldn’t entirely write it off just yet. ? ? Sincerely, Alan ? Alan, many thanks for this information. I really thought that the second tracklet was a good confirmation, and this was the reason for my message, but now it seems it might still be questionable. Maik Sent from my mobile 11.12.2024 21:52:28 Alan Hale <ahale@...>: toggle quoted message Show quoted text Hi Maik, all, ? I just took some images with LCO-Tenerife, and was unable to detect any moving objects down to magnitude ~19 within a 5x5 arcminute field centered on the predicted ephemeris position. ? ? Sincerely, Alan ? Hello all, ? I want to point out the object MOU0001 on the NEOCP. ? My parabolic solution looks very interesting - intrinsically faint but very close approach to Earth in January. Of course, this is based on just 18 hours of arc, so more observations are needed, to see how close to the truth it is. ? Maik -- "One cannot discover comets lying in bed." * Lewis Swift ________________________________________________________________________ ? *** @skymorph.bsky.social ? ? ? ? ? ?
Luigi Sannino All Messages By This Member #33096 Hi everyone, we also tried to film the MOU0001 field and we did not detect anything in the field. Greetings Monte Viseggi Observatory 126 Associazione Astrofili Spezzini - APS Via delle Fornaci 1/A 19122 La Spezia toggle quoted message Show quoted text Il giorno mer 11 dic 2024 alle 22:14 Alan Hale via <ahale=[email protected]> ha scritto: Hi Maik, all, ? I’d still encourage anyone else to have a go at this. Theoretically, it could be “there” but faint, or several arcmin away from the ephemeris position and I somehow missed it, but in any event I wouldn’t entirely write it off just yet. ? ? Sincerely, Alan ? Alan, many thanks for this information. I really thought that the second tracklet was a good confirmation, and this was the reason for my message, but now it seems it might still be questionable. Maik Sent from my mobile 11.12.2024 21:52:28 Alan Hale <ahale@...>: Hi Maik, all, ? I just took some images with LCO-Tenerife, and was unable to detect any moving objects down to magnitude ~19 within a 5x5 arcminute field centered on the predicted ephemeris position. ? ? Sincerely, Alan ? Hello all, ? I want to point out the object MOU0001 on the NEOCP. ? My parabolic solution looks very interesting - intrinsically faint but very close approach to Earth in January. Of course, this is based on just 18 hours of arc, so more observations are needed, to see how close to the truth it is. ? Maik -- "One cannot discover comets lying in bed." * Lewis Swift ________________________________________________________________________ ? *** @skymorph.bsky.social ? ? ? ? ? ?

Previous Topic Next Topic