开云体育

Charles - I think the Martyns I have on my spreadsheet are different than the two Martins you're referring to (Dan and Wyatt), because these Martyns are fairly distantly related to Chuck Martin - the

Here's another quick update... I've updated the STR and GD spreadsheets. I changed the STR spreadsheet to utilize DYS389b for slightly better accuracy - details at

HI Jared, Did you add Griffin #121779? Only 25 markers listed but 22/25 or 21/25 with me depending on interpretation of 464. Yes, I would be glad to write the Lewises and Ferneyhough and Dean. I will

Charles - I was only peripherally aware of the SMGF database. It's a bad deal what happened to it. It wasn't an LDS-only project, though they did focus aspects of it to LDS church members because of

Looks great, Jared. The Griffin #121779, however, has 19 at DYS458 but that's still a very close match with the ones you included. It would be great if #121779 could be contacted and persuaded to

Results are in -- I'm not sure I've learned anything new though. Well, the TMRCA is new to me. Y-Haplogroup: R-Z16351 <https://www.yfull.com/tree/R-DF1/> Terminal SNPs: FGC33419 ? Z16343 ? Z16344

Hello all, Appreciate all the work. ?I travel quite a bit and haven't really kept up with all the dialog. Is there anything I can do? ?I looked up my matches, should I reach out to Wesley Martin and

Thomas - Thanks for checking in. I've been e-mailing Don Gilroy. Maybe hold off on reaching out to Wesley Martin until we get the SNP pack results in from Chuck Martin (he's subscribed to this list).

James - Thanks for letting us know. I don't see your results yet being considered in the age calculations though. I was really hoping they'd break up this block - they have everything from Z16357 down

Hi James, I was thinking your results might be compared with Joel's and mine and a new branch and new TMRCA estimates be presented at YFull but I don't see it yet. Maybe more is on the way, or maybe

Jared, Would you mind trying to contact Ben E. Evans (VU8W9) via ysearch if you haven't done so already? I found noted that I wrote him last month on Dec. 3 and I've not gotten a response. Maybe you

Hi all, Here is my version at YFull: I show a slightly closer match to Bennett than Thomas. The YTree was last updated January 4th. I'm not sure how often they update it. I'm not sure how it would be

Does anyone know why I have a 0 SNP difference to Thomas and Bennett and a 2 SNP difference to Merrick on the Big Y?

There are really four levels of reporting for each SNP: positive, negative, maybe, and no coverage. The 'maybe' results (this is my terminology, not FTDNA's) are markers where you show the SNP in your

To add a some additional thoughts on this... - You can see the four SNP test result states in Alex's mutations matrix at the Big Tree. - How do we know Thomas and Bennett are BY11573 if their results

This is a fundamental limitation of YFull - they use such a limited set of available data to determine their tree - only results of those who have purchased their analysis. They won't know about other

Here are the two SNPs that the Big Y shows as being different between me and Merrick: CTS3563 CTS11841 According to the Big Tree website: CTS3563 is 15022900-G-A That shows up as a unique mutation for

Then scratch what I posted before - though this is the logic used for positioning on the tree. I recall now that I had written earlier about these 2 SNPs. These are both known SNPs, but for totally

Thanks Jared, I guess that the FTDNA algorithms work most of the time - not so well in this case. It seems like they should have some exceptions for SNPs that are in other Haplogroups. Joel

Hi Jared, I haven't heard from anyone whom I emailed and cc'ed to you a week ago. I just wanted to check in to see whether any of them may have replied to you.. Thanks, Charles