开云体育

Charles - Nothing yet. I'll follow up with them soon. Thanks, Jared

Joel noted on the R-L513 list that YFull has updated their tree based on Bennett's results - https://www.yfull.com/tree/R-S5668/ R-Z16351 is our branch (what I call Z16357). They have Joel alone at

I'd like to welcome Michael Hartley to the group. He has kit #617805 and has recently done the Y67 DNA test. He likely shows as a match to some of you (he is GD=7 to me at Y67). I've added him to the

As a quick follow-up, Merrick's BAM file was analyzed by FTDNA and they've confirmed that Merrick is positive for Y29969, so this confirms my suspicion that it is equivalent to BY11573. This also

My Big-Y results (kit #307773) are in. I am firmly (still) at R-Z17911. I had hoped that I would share some private/novel SNPs with Hartley, or maybe a few with Bennett or Thomas, but it appears that

Hi Jared, So I suspect on your Z16357 SNP Tree, you will be branching off on a pink box parallel to me under Z17911. Joel

Jared, You are my top BigY match now: Joel

Yes, I now form a new theoretical branch from Z17911 (well, theoretical until I can get a closer cousin to test). My branch will be a sibling to your Hartley branch, which is a sibling to the BY11573

Hi Jared, It seems like with the people that we had, all the branching that was going to happen already happened. The good news is that Michael Hartley has expressed interest in the Big Y. This could

Hi Jared, It's of no consequence to my Y-DNA lineage or to your research,?but in another line?I'm supposedy a descendant of?Nicholas Smith d.1719 Surry County, VA, and wife Elizabeth Flood. His

Charles - That is interesting. It does appear that your (supposed) ancestor is probably I-M223. Sylvia and Lenita (our Z16357 people) and I are in the Smith R-M269-16 group. Many or most of the other

Jared, You have piqued my interest concerning your exciting news. Joel

The Big-Y results for Brent Phillips are in. He is confirmed R-Y29969 with Bennett and Thomas. This is phylogenetically equivalent to BY11573. You'll notice FTDNA has changed the terminal SNP for

I forgot to mention that I've updated the charts at http://dna.smithplanet.com/snp to reflect these changes, in case you prefer a visual view of what's happening. Jared

Thanks for the update. I checked and yes FTDNA does indeed show me as R-Y29969 now with BY11573 shown in light brown meaning presumed positive beside Y29969 on the tree. I also noticed that Rodney

Thanks Jared, I was wondering what happened to that test. Also I'm wondering why I can't see Phillips on my match list? Hopefully, it should show up soon. Joel

Charles - Oh, that must be Chuck Martin's SNP pack results. I don't see those results at all yet, but that would put him at the same place on the tree as you. We don't know if he's on the same branch

I have uploaded a new spreadsheet to http://dna.smithplanet.com/media/Z16357-Variants.xlsx This likely has limited utility for anyone other than me, but I thought I'd share it. This file is used for

Thanks, Jared, That should be a great resource. I'll send some of my SNPs your way once I sort them out. YFull has them as: Best Quality (5) Acceptable (6) Ambiguous (20) I'm guessing you just want

Addendum, there are actually more categories: I assume that ambiguous is better than Low quality. Perhaps you do want the Ambiguous ones. Joel