开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Please forward this letter to membership

 

From: "Yedidye Hirtenfeld" <YedidyeH@...>
Subject: Fw: Please forward this letter to membership
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2001 09:27:07 -0500

Please forward this letter
Thanks
Yedidye

----- Original Message -----
From: <Vroom45@...>
To: <yedidyeh@...>
Sent: Monday, January 01, 2001 9:19 PM
Subject: letter to membership


Dear Member,

A few weeks ago the Young Israel of Midwood lost a founding
member of our Kehillah. Mr. Lou Rosenman was beloved by all who knew
him. His devotion to our shul in all its capacities should serve as an ideal for all of us to emulate.

Each one of us remember the many years he served as a Shliach
Tzibbur on the Yomim Noraim. His tefillah's were an inspiration to those who were lucky enough to have davened with him.

Over twenty years ago Mr. Rosenman instituted the learning of
Mishnayos culminating in a yearly Siyum Mishnayos. The countless learning of Mishnayos by our Kehillah is a tremendous for his.

We feel that an appropiate way to honor his memory is to
dedicate a plaque listing each year"s Mishnayos learning which will hang in our Bais Hamedrash.
We are sure you would like to join in this proper memorial to
Mr. Lou Rosenman by contributing in his memory.

Sincerely,


Yedidye Hirtenfeld
David Stern




_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at


Fw: Weekly Halacha - Parshas Vayigash - Kiddush

Eli Shulman
 

You may find this useful. - EBS


WEEKLY-HALACHA FOR 5761



SELECTED HALACHOS RELATING TO PARSHAS VAYIGASH

By Rabbi Doniel Neustadt
Rav of Young Israel of Cleveland Heights

A discussion of Halachic topics related to the Parsha of the
week. For final rulings, consult your Rav.

KIDDUSH IN SHUL: PROPER CONDUCT

KIDDUSH

Kiddush is recited over a cup(1) of wine or grape juice which holds a
revi'is (3.3. fl. oz.). At least a cheekful (approx. 1.7. fl. oz.) must be
drunk.(2)

There is no requirement for anybody but the person who makes Kiddush to
taste the wine. As long as the listener intended to fulfill the mitzvah of
Kiddush and heard every word of the blessing, he fulfills the mitzvah. It
is, however, desirable (a mitzvah min ha-muvchar) to partake of the
Kiddush
cup.(3) For this reason, many people make certain to drink some wine when
attending a kiddush in shul. Doing so, however, can lead to a problematic
situation regarding the correct blessing for any other beverage which will
be drunk at the kiddush. Let us explain:

The blessing of Borei pri ha-gefen automatically includes any beverage
which is on the table or which will be brought to the table during the
kiddush. No shehakol is recited on soda or juice, etc. that will be drunk
during the kiddush.(4)

Even those who did not actually recite Borei pri ha-gefen but heard
Kiddush
from another person do not recite a shehakol on other beverages. This rule
applies only if one drank a melo lugmav (a cheekful) of wine or grape
juice.

If one drank some wine or grape juice ? but less then a melo lugmav ? and
wishes to drink another beverage, it is questionable(5) if he needs to
recite a shehakol on the other beverages. It follows, therefore, that
those
who listen to someone else's Kiddush and partake of the wine and then want
to drink another beverage, must do one of the following(6):
Drink at least a cheekful;
Recite a shehakol on a food item;
Listen to a shehakol recited by another person.

KIDDUSH ON SCHNAPPS

It is a common practice to recite Kiddush Shabbos morning over a 1 oz. cup
of schnapps [or liqueur.(7)] Although many poskim(8) object, as Kiddush
must
be recited over a cup which holds at least a revi'is and at least a
cheekful
must be drunk, still there are poskim(9) who defend this minhag
Yisrael.(10)
They reason that schnapps is different from wine since it is normally
consumed in much smaller quantities and is therefore subject to a
different
set of measurements.(11)

Those who rely on this leniency and recite Kiddush over schnapps, must
also
recite a Borei nefashos over the schnapps, even though only a small amount
was drunk. Although one does not recite a Borei nefashos unless he drinks
3.3. fl oz. of a beverage,(12) schnapps - according to this view - is an
exception and requires a Borei nefashos even on a much smaller amount.(13)

When no wine or grape juice is available, there is a way of reciting
Kiddush over schnapps which will satisfy the opinions of most poskim:
Recite
Kiddush on a revi'is of schnapps and drink a cheekful or a revi'is, but
instead of swallowing it in one shot, sip it slowly, for a period of up to
3-4 minutes.(14) When even this is not possible, a next best option is to
share the cheekful with others who are listening to the Kiddush.(15)

KIDDUSH B'MAKOM SEUDAH

Kiddush must always be followed by a seudah (meal). Most poskim(16)
maintain that mezonos eaten at a kiddush is considered a "seudah" for this
purpose.(17) After making Kiddush, at least a k'zayis (approx. 1.1 fl.
oz.)
of mezonos must be eaten within a span of 3-4 minutes. One who failed to
do
so must repeat Kiddush at home before his meal. A mezonos kugel is
considered full-fledged mezonos in regard to this halachah.(18)

On Pesach or other times when mezonos items are not available, the
preferred method is to eat the seudah immediately after reciting Kiddush.
If
that is difficult, one should drink an additional revi'is (3.3 fl. oz.) of
wine or grape juice. If one has no other wine or grape juice, he can rely
on
the revi'is of wine he consumed for Kiddush.(19)

There are poskim(20) who maintain that even l'chatchilah, one may eat
fruit
or shehakol items after Kiddush is recited if there are no mezonos items
available. But then, Kiddush must be repeated at home before the meal.
Other
poskim(21) allow this practice only under special circumstances, such as
the
case of a person who is weak and needs to eat and has no mezonos
available.

There is no need to repeat Kiddush at home if the requirements for Kiddush
were met earlier in shul or at the simchah hall, unless there are other
people at home who did not yet hear Kiddush. One who made Kiddush on
schnapps should preferably repeat Kiddush at home over wine or grape
juice.(22)

CHOLENT

The proper blessing over cholent depends on the ingredients:

A cholent which contains beans, potatoes and small pieces of meat or
chicken requires only Borei pri ha-adamah. It is considered a "single
entity
mixture" since the entire mixture is eaten together in one spoonful.
Because
the ha-adamah ingredients constitute the rov (majority) of the cholent
mixture, they determine the blessing for the cholent ha-adamah.(23) Even
if
the cholent has a soupy consistency, no shehakol blessing is required. The
berachah acharonah is Borei nefashos.

When kishke is served along with the cholent, the kishke requires a
blessing of Borei minei mezonos. Since the kishke is generally not eaten
in
the same spoonful as the cholent, its blessing does not exempt the rest of
the cholent from the blessing of ha-adamah,(24) and so two blessings are
required.

The other type of cholent is the kind which contains barley in addition to
potatoes, beans and small pieces of meat or chicken. This kind of cholent
requires only a mezonos blessing. Since it is a "single entity mixture"
which contains a member of the five species of grain (barley), the barley
assumes the halachic status of ikar (a preeminent ingredient), even if
there
is less barley than beans and potatoes.(25) The mezonos said over the
barley
exempts all the other ingredients in the cholent. In order for the barley
to
be considered the ikar, the following two conditions must be met:
The barley must be added to the cholent to enhance its taste. If it is
added
to the cholent just as a binding or thickening agent,(26) or to give it
color or aroma,(27) a mezonos is not said over the barley [or the
cholent];
The taste of the barley must actually be noticeable in the mixture.(28)
In most cases when barley is added to the cholent, the above two
conditions
are met. The proper blessing, then, is mezonos. No other blessing should
be
made over the other ingredients.(29) If, after reciting a mezonos on the
barley, one recites another blessing, such as ha-adamah on the potatoes or
shehakol on the meat, he may be reciting a blessing in vain (berachah
l'vatalah).(30) If one recites ha-adamah or shehakol before the mezonos,
he
may be reciting an unnecessary blessing(31) (berachah she-einah
tzerichah).

An exception to the above rules is when the cholent contains large pieces
of meat and chicken which are not eaten together with the rest of the
cholent.(32) In that case, a shehakol is said over the meat or chicken
after
the mezonos has been recited over the cholent.

The berachah acharonah on barley cholent depends on the amount of barley
consumed. If one eats a k'zayis of barley (approx. 1.1 fl. oz.) in 3-4
minutes or less, Al ha-michyah is said. No Borei nefashos is required.(33)
If less than that amount of barley is eaten, a Borei nefashos is said over
the rest of the cholent.

The preferred method when eating a barley cholent at a kiddush is to
recite
a mezonos over the cake at the beginning of the kiddush while having in
mind
the cholent as well(34); this obviates the need for a blessing over the
cholent. The Al ha-michyah recited over the cake will include the cholent
also, thus making it unnecessary to estimate the amount of barley eaten
and
the time span within which it was consumed.

Note, however, that when barley cholent is served there is no need at all
to eat cake, as one may fulfill his obligation of Kiddush b'makom seudah
by
eating a k'zayis of barley from the cholent.(35)

Rabbi Neustadt can be reached at 216-321-4635 or by fax 216-321-5687

FOOTNOTES:

1 Some poskim advise against using a disposable cup for Kiddush (Igros
Moshe
O.C. 3:39; Minchas Yitzchak 10:23) while others are not particular about
that (Harav Y.S. Elyashiv, quoted in Shevus Yitzchak, Muktzeh, pg. 48;
Tzitz
Eliezer 12:23).

2 Based on the shiur of Harav M. Feinstein. A cheekful is a little more
than
half a revi'is.

3 O.C. 274:14. There is a minority view (Brisker Rav quoted in Mo'adim
u'Zemanim 3:243) that holds that on Shabbos morning one must partake of
the
kiddush cup in order to fulfill the mitzvah. The poskim, however do not
agree with this stringency; see Yechaveh Da'as 5:20.

4 O.C. 174:2. Note, though, that Harav Y.S. Elyashiv is quoted (Vezos
ha-Berachah, pg. 267) as ruling that only a Borei pri ha-gefen over wine
exempts all other beverages; when it is recited over grape juice it does
not
exempt other beverages.

5 Derech ha-Chayim rules that it is sufficient, but Beiur Halachah 174:2
questions that. See Yechaveh Da'as 5:20 and Minchas Yitzchak 8:19.

6 Beiur Halachah 174:2. [It is not sufficient to have specific intention
that the blessing over the wine should not cover other beverages; Harav
Y.S.
Elyashiv, quoted in Vezos ha-Berachah, pg. 100.]

7 Minchas Yitzchak 10:22.

8 Mishnah Berurah 272:30; Aruch ha-Shulchan 272:13; Minchas Shabbos 79:29;
Ketzos ha-Shulchan 89:5.

9 Ktzei ha-Mateh (Mateh Efraim 625:99); Eishel Avraham 272:6; Maharsham
1:175;
Chelkas Yaakov 1:94.

10 Because the practice was defended (in part) due to the scarcity and
expense of wine, some poskim suggest that nowadays, Kiddush should be made
over wine or grape juice only, see Nimukei Orchos Chayim 273.

11 This is based on the view of the Taz O.C. 210:1, which is rejected by
the
latter poskim; see Mishnah Berurah 190:14.

12 O.C. 190:3.

13 Har Tzvi O.C. 159. It follows therefore, that those who follow the
majority view and do not recite kiddush on schnapps, do not recite a Borei
nefashos when drinking an amount of schnapps less than a revi'is.

14 Mishnah Berurah 271:68. No talking should take place until the minimum
amount is drunk.

15 Mishnah Berurah 272:30.

16 Mishnah Berurah 273:25.

17 A notable exception is the view of the G"ra, who maintains that kiddush
can be made only when a seudah of bread follows. His view is quoted by the
Beiur Halachah 273:5 without comment. Aruch ha-Shulchan 273:8 considers
this
to be the preferred method. The general custom, however, follows the view
of
most poskim.

18 Shemiras Shabbos K'hilchasah 54:22; Az Nidberu 8:31. See Me'or
ha-Shabbos, vol. 2, pg. 576.

19 Mishnah Berurah 273:25, 27.

20 Igros Moshe O.C. 4:63. See also Ein Yitzchak O.C. 12; B'tzeil
ha-Chochmah
4:2; 5:115.

21 Mishnah Berurah 273:26.

22 To satisfy the view of the majority of the poskim.

23 O.C. 208:7. Mishnah Berurah 204:57; 207:7; 212:1.

24 Aruch ha-Shulchan 212:2.

25 Mishnah Berurah and Aruch ha-Shulchan 212:1. This is true even if the
taste of the barley is not the preferred one.

26 O.C. 208:2.

27 O.C. 204:12.

28 Mishnah Berurah 208:49; Beiur Halachah 208:9; Sha'ar ha-Tziyun 212:6;
oral ruling from Harav M. Feinstein (quoted in Guide to Practical
Halachah,
vol. 2, pg. 204).

29 Note that a dissenting opinion (Chayei Adam 51:13; 54:9 and Kitzur
Shulchan Aruch 54:5) maintains that when each item is recognizable, a
separate berachah is made over each. Mishnah Berurah and Aruch
ha-Shulchan,
however, do not agree, and Harav S.Z. Auerbach (Vezos ha-Berachah, pg. 94)
and Harav Y.S. Elyashiv (V'sein Berachah, pg. 63) rule that one need not
concern himself with the dissenting view.

30 Mishnah Berurah 168:43.

31 This depends on a disagreement among the Poskim ??see Sha'arei Teshuvah
212:1; Shulchan Aruch Harav 249:4; Sha'ar ha-Tziyon 212:15.

32 Aruch ha-Shulchan 212:2; Harav Y.S. Elyashiv (quoted in Vezos
ha-Berachah, pg. 109).

33 O.C. 212:1; Mishnah Berurah 208:48; Igros Moshe O.C. 1:68.

34 The blessing is valid even though the cholent has not yet been served.

35 See O.C. 639:2, Mishnah Berurah 15 and Sha'ar ha-Tziyun 35.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weekly-Halacha, Copyright 2001 by Rabbi Neustadt, Dr. Jeffrey Gross and
Torah.org. The author, Rabbi Neustadt, is the principal of Yavne
Teachers' College in Cleveland, Ohio. He is also the Magid Shiur of a
daily
Mishna Berurah class at Congregation Shomre Shabbos.

The Weekly-Halacha Series is distributed L'zchus Doniel Meir ben Hinda.
Weekly sponsorships are available - please mail to jgross@... .

The series is distributed by the Harbotzas Torah Division of Congregation
Shomre Shabbos, 1801 South Taylor Road, Cleveland Heights, Ohio 44118
HaRav Yisroel Grumer, Marah D'Asra.

This list is part of Torah.org: The Judaism Site (Project Genesis, Inc.).
Permission is granted to redistribute, but please give proper attribution
and copyright to the author and Torah.org. Both the author and Torah.org
reserve certain rights. For full information on copyrights, send email to
copyrights@... .

To begin or cancel your subscription to this class, please write to
weekly-halacha-subscribe@... or weekly-halacha-unsubscribe@...
as appropriate.

For further help, and for information on archives and subscriptions to
other classes, please ask the Torah.org Robot Gabbai, gabbai@... .

Torah.org depends upon your support. Please visit

or write to dedications@... or donations@... . Thank you!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Torah.org: The Judaism Site
17 Warren Road, Suite 2B learn@...
Baltimore, MD 21208 (410) 602-1350 FAX: 510-1053
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


Shop Safely Online Without a Credit Card


website

Eli Shulman
 

开云体育

Check out the shul's website at
?


10 Teves

Eli Shulman
 

开云体育

Please be informed that we will have iy"h a special mincha?this Friday, Assarah b'Teves, at 3:00 PM.


Mazal Tov

 

You'll be the first to know that Esther Hirtenfeld Friedman & Yitzy Friedman
daughter of Chaya & Yedidye Hirtenfeld had a baby GIRL
MAZAL TOV


Fw:

Eli Shulman
 

----- Original Message -----
From: Pesach Lerner <plerner@...>
To: Am Echad <AmEchad@...>; Full National Board
<FullNationalBoard@...>; Metro NY Presidents
<MetroNYPresidents@...>; Metro NY Rabbis
<MetroNYRabbis@...>
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 11:33 AM



DO JOIN US
WE WANT A LARGE REPRESENTATION
PL
---



PLEASE JOIN US and DISTRIBUTE THIS MESSAGE

Did you see the rally in Jerusalem yesterday?

Did you wish you where there?


Join us at a Press conference/rally hosted by Mayor Rudolph Giuliani
with
the Mayor of Jerusalem Ehud Olmert, Health Minister Roni Milo and MK
Nathan
Sharansky

Send a clear message in support of Jerusalem remaining the UNDIVIDED
united
capital of the Jewish people FOREVER!

This Thursday, Jan. 11 at 1:30PM at City Hall

Organized in assistance with MWI - Media Watch International a newly
formed organization whose mission is to ensure fair, accountable,
unbiased
reporting of the global media on Israel, the Middle East and the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

For more information contact Sharon tzur at: 212-713-0300














_____________________________
Rabbi Irwin Katsof
The Jerusalem Fund of Aish HaTorah
156 West 56th Street, Suite 1201
New York, NY 10019 USA
PH: (212) 713-0300
FX: (212) 713-0430
Pager: (800) 317-3350


Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <Jerusalemfund@...>
From: Jerusalemfund@...
Full-name: Jerusalemfund
Message-ID: <17.1008a63b.278d38e6@...>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 23:02:46 EST
Subject: Fwd: Oath to Jerusalem in NYC
To: Jerusalemfund@...
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: 6.0 sub 148
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary=part2_c6.fbe0000.278d38e6_boundary

In a message dated 1/9/2001 10:48:01 PM Eastern Standard Time,
stzur@... writes:







PLEASE JOIN US and DISTRIBUTE THIS MESSAGE

Did you see the rally in Jerusalem yesterday?

Did you wish you where there?


Join us at a Press conference/rally hosted by Mayor Rudolph Giuliani
with
the Mayor of Jerusalem Ehud Olmert, Health Minister Roni Milo and MK
Nathan
Sharansky

Send a clear message in support of Jerusalem remaining the UNDIVIDED
united
capital of the Jewish people FOREVER!

This Thursday, Jan. 11 at 1:30PM at City Hall

Organized in assistance with MWI - Media Watch International a newly
formed organization whose mission is to ensure fair, accountable,
unbiased
reporting of the global media on Israel, the Middle East and the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

For more information contact Sharon tzur at: 212-713-0300







_____________________________
Rabbi Irwin Katsof
The Jerusalem Fund of Aish HaTorah
156 West 56th Street, Suite 1201
New York, NY 10019 USA
PH: (212) 713-0300
FX: (212) 713-0430
Pager: (800) 317-3350


Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-Path: <stzur@...>
Received: from rly-xb04.mx.aol.com (rly-xb04.mail.aol.com
[172.20.105.105])
by air-xb03.mail.aol.com (v77.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Jan 2001 22:48:01
-0500
Received: from mail5.registeredsite.com (mail5.registeredsite.com
[64.224.9.14]) by rly-xb04.mx.aol.com (v77.27) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Jan
2001
22:47:54 -0500
Received: from mail.jerusalemfund.com (mail.jerusalemfund.net
[209.35.137.192]) by mail5.registeredsite.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP
id
f0A3lcn12032; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 22:47:38 -0500
Received: from Elise.Flashcom.net [216.32.203.25] by
mail.jerusalemfund.com
(SMTPD32-5.05) id AB34797E00F6; Tue, 09 Jan 2001 22:47:00 -0500
Received: by localhost with Microsoft MAPI; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 22:47:16
-0500
Message-ID: <01C07A8E.1D83DE60.stzur@...>
From: "Sharon Tzur" <stzur@...>
To: "'philip.rosen@...'" <philip.rosen@...>
Subject: Re: Oath to Jerusalem in NYC
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 22:47:15 -0500
Importance: high
X-Priority: 1 (Highest)
X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet E-mail/MAPI - 8.0.0.4211
Encoding: 23 TEXT
Content-Type: text/plain

PLEASE JOIN US and DISTRIBUTE THIS MESSAGE

Did you see the rally in Jerusalem yesterday?

Did you wish you where there?


Join us at a Press conference/rally hosted by Mayor Rudolph Giuliani
with
the Mayor of Jerusalem Ehud Olmert, Health Minister Roni Milo and MK
Nathan
Sharansky

Send a clear message in support of Jerusalem remaining the UNDIVIDED
united
capital of the Jewish people FOREVER!

This Thursday, Jan. 11 at 1:30PM at City Hall

Organized in assistance with MWI - Media Watch International a newly
formed organization which mission is to ensure fair, accountable,
unbiased
reporting of the global media on Israel, the Middle East and the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

For more information contact Sharon tzur at: 212-713-0300










NOTE
The information contained in this email message is intended only
for use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or
agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this communication in error, please immediately
notify us by telephone (212-310-8000), and destroy the original
message. Thank you.





Shop online without a credit card

RocketCash, a NetZero subsidiary


Fw: 'Peace Psychosis' In The Mideast

Eli Shulman
 

----- Original Message -----
From: Shulman, Charles <shulmc@...>
To: 'Rabbi Dr. Nisson E. Shulman' <neshulman@...>; 'Rabbi Dr. Zalman
Kossowsky' <rabbi@...>; 'Rabbi Eli Shulman (Yahoo)'
<elishulman@...>; 'Rabbi Moshe Shulman' <shulman@...>; 'Rabbi
Yaakov Neuburger' <bneub4800@...>; 'Rabbi Shlomo Hochberg'
<Shlomoje@...>; 'Dr. Daniel Klapper' <daklapper@...>
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 6:07 PM
Subject: 'Peace Psychosis' In The Mideast




The Last Word

George F. Will

NEWSWEEK

Jan. 8 issue

'Peace Psychosis' In The Mideast



Many realists worry that for Jews gathered in Israel, history may have
saved
its worst for last.



Bill Clinton may have saved his very worst for last. With remarkable-even
for him-self-absorption, as he tap-dances toward the exit he is pursuing
as
his crowning legacy something that only the cynical or delusional could
call
a "final" Middle East "peace agreement." In three weeks Clinton will be
gone, leaving intensified Middle East chaos for others to cope with.


Israel's Ehud Barak has resigned as prime minister, triggering Feb. 6
elections that polls indicate he will lose in a landslide. For him, the
long
term is five weeks. Yet by then he hopes to have achieved a "permanent"
solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict that is now in its sixth
decade. Yasir Arafat founded the Palestine National Liberation Movement,
committed to Israel's destruction, when Eisenhower was president and
Ben-Gurion was Israel's prime minister. Through 14 Israeli prime
ministries
and nine U.S. presidencies, Arafat has remained so committed.

It has come to this: Clinton has asked Barak-who has a negligible
constituency, and who has never asked Israeli voters for a mandate for
anything remotely resembling the dangerous menu of territorial and other
concessions he already has offered Arafat-to dismantle Israel's capital by
ceding to Arafat sovereignty over Arab neighborhoods in East Jerusalem.
Clinton also has asked Barak to surrender to Arafat sovereignty over the
holiest place in Israel's capital, the Temple Mount, location of the
Second
Temple, destroyed in A.D. 70.

RIGHT OF RETURN

Arafat is affronted by the offer because it is conditioned on his
forsaking
the "right of return." That is the claimed right of up to 4 million
people,
who left Israel during its violent birth pangs in 1948, to return to their
homes. Imagine identifying the possessors of this right, and the possible
permutations of it.

Today about a million Palestinians remain in what are propagandistically
called "refugee camps." In 1945 there were many millions of refugees and
other displaced persons in Europe, many in camps. By 1950 this problem was
essentially solved. Why, 52 years after the failure of the Arab war to
kill
the state of Israel in its infancy, are there still camps populated by the
children, grandchildren, even great-grandchildren of people displaced in
1948? Because Arafat and other Arab leaders use these festering sores to
foment irredentist extremism.

Acknowledging a "right of return" would be, for Israel, demographic
suicide.
That right is integral to Arafat's aim, the destruction of the Jewish
state.
Insistence on the right is tantamount to root-and-branch rejection of the
supposed goal of the post-Oslo peace process-"two states for two peoples."
That process has been a fiasco because it has assumed that Arafat simply
wants to govern a Middle Eastern Belgium-a small bourgeois nation located
on
whatever territories he, with American help, can extort from Israel. This
assumption requires those who hold it to constantly deny that Arafat means
what he constantly tells Arabic-speaking audiences-that "with our blood
and
our martyrs we will redeem Palestine." Last Wednesday, taking time out
from
deliberations about the Clinton-Barak offer, Arafat expressed optimism
about
one day seeing "a Palestinian boy or a Palestinian girl raising the flag
of
Palestine over the walls and churches and minarets of Holy Jerusalem."
Which
is to say, over all of Jerusalem.

Writing in the London Times Literary Supplement, Edward Luttwak of the
Center for Strategic and International Studies says, "It is not a
rhetorical
exaggeration to speak of a peace psychosis, for that is what psychotics
do:
they impose their own imaginings on others, persuading themselves... in
this
instance, that after a lifetime of struggle, Arafat wanted to end his days
as a compromising negotiator, rather than as a conqueror." As evidence
that
Arafat still sees himself as a conqueror, Luttwak reports that in 1998 a
Palestinian editor of a newspaper published in East Jerusalem was
kidnapped
by Arafat henchmen, held for a week and beaten. His offense? He printed on
page three rather than page one an article, written by an Arafat flack,
comparing Arafat to the conqueror Saladin, who wrested Jerusalem from the
Crusaders.

IGNORED EVIDENCE

Barak's surreal 18 months of ignoring all such evidence has given Israel
the
worst governance in its history, as he has emboldened Arafat by making
concession after concession in the hope that the recidivist liar would
recognize Israel's right to exist. Until now Barak seems never to have met
a
concession he would not consider and soon offer, and evidently he
seriously
considered Clinton's latest and most reckless proposals for appeasing
Arafat. But on Friday, in the aftermath of another terrorist bomb attack
in
Tel Aviv, and in the context of his plunge in the polls, he said Israel
"never" would "transfer sovereignty of the Temple Mount-the anchor of our
identity." At last, a sticking point.

The United States has cast itself as "honest broker" between the only
democracy in the region and those avowing their determination to destroy
it.
And the future of the Palestinian people is prefigured in the corrupt and
violent thugocracy-the Palestinian Authority-that currently misgoverns the
West Bank (per capita GNP, $2,300) and Gaza (per capita GNP, $1,000).

In Washington an Israeli diplomat who shares Barak's thinking stoutly
insists he does not "trust" Arafat. But Arafat is utterly reliable. He can
be trusted never to keep an agreement and always to be candid about his
ultimate objective, possession of all of Palestine-meaning the
annihilation
of the "Zionist entity." The diplomat serenely-and surreally-says optimism
is integral to Zionism. Actually, Zionism was born of profound pessimism
about the ability of European Jews to achieve fulfillment or even safety
without a national homeland, and the Zionist state was born of history's
severest instruction in pessimism-the Holocaust. Pessimists are realists
who
worry that, for the portion of world Jewry gathered in Israel, history may
have saved its worst for last.

2001 Newsweek, Inc.





The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged and
confidential information and is intended only for the use of the individual
and/or entity identified in the alias address of this message. If the
reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or
agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby
requested not to distribute or copy this communication. If you have received
this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone or
return e-mail and delete the original message from your system.

Thank you.

Shop online without a credit card

RocketCash, a NetZero subsidiary


Fw: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE PRESIDENT-ELECT FROM AN ORTHODOX JEWISH LEADER

Eli Shulman
 

----- Original Message -----
From: NEWS - Agudath Israel of America <news@...>
To: NEWS - Agudath Israel of America <news@...>
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 11:40 AM
Subject: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE PRESIDENT-ELECT FROM AN ORTHODOX JEWISH
LEADER


Dear NEWS@... Members,
We are pleased to inform you that Agudath Israel
headquarters is moving to new and larger quarters.
At present the Agudath Israel of America
offices are moving, within the next two weeks, from 84 William Street to
42 Broadway, 14th Floor, New York, NY 10006.
Plans are underway to update our email systems. We will notify you of
these changes in the near future.

As was emailed, this coming Monday evening, January 15-16 Agudath Israel
is
sponsoring a Yarchei Kallah Group Mission to Israel. A large
attendance is expected with participants from the US, Canada, England,
Belgium and Israel joining in the three-day event.

Below is a copy of a letter that was sent to the President-Elect from Mr.
Chaim Dovid Zweibel. We are sure you will find this to be of interest.

Sincerely,
Rabbi Labish Becker - Associate Executive Director
Rabbi Mordechi Ort - NEWS Email Coordinator
____________________________________________________________
January 3, 2000

Dear President-Elect Bush:

As close as the election was, it wasn't much of a contest in the Jewish
community; polls suggest that an overwhelming majority of American Jews
supported the Gore-Lieberman ticket. This would appear to confirm some
long- and widely-held perceptions about the political proclivities and
policy preferences of Jews in the United States.

Election results and conventional wisdom notwithstanding, American Jewry
is
not quite the monolith we are often portrayed as being. To be sure, there
is an essential unity that binds all Jews together. And there is a clear
consensus among American Jews on several issues of across-the-board
political concern - most notably the importance of America reaffirming and
strengthening its longstanding special relationship with Israel and the
need
to promote a domestic climate of tolerance and equal opportunity. Beyond
those essential points, though, the Jewish community in the United States
is
in a state of ferment and flux, and it is important that our next
president
be sensitive to that reality.

Much of that ferment and flux emerges from a historical conundrum that
lies
at the heart of the contemporary American Jewish experience. Our parents
and grandparents, for the most part, emigrated to this country in the
early
and mid-1900's, escaping the ghettos and pogroms and concentration camps
of
a genocidally hostile Europe. They came, yearning to breathe free and
partake of the American dream. Yet they frequently encountered
resistance,
rebuffed in their efforts to live in certain neighborhoods, join certain
country clubs, attend certain universities, gain employment with certain
firms.

Thus was established American Jewish Priority Number One: to find ways and
means, through the operation of law and the influence of culture, to break
down all barriers that prevented Jewish assimilation into the great
American
mainstream. Slowly but surely, those efforts succeeded. Anti-Semitism in
this country has not disappeared entirely, but it has surely faded into
the
murky shadows. Jews have become accepted in virtually every nook and
cranny
of American society - even in the once unimaginable position of running
for
Vice President of the United States. History's proverbial outsiders have
become America's successful insiders.

The strategy worked. But it worked a bit too well. Jews in this country
have done such a marvelous job of assimilating into the broader culture
that
they are in danger of fading into demographic oblivion. Intermarriage
rates
have skyrocketed; Jewish ignorance is rampant; Jewish identity has no
relevance to millions of our children.

Many American Jews are beginning to recognize, therefore, that the time
has
come to acknowledge and develop strategies to achieve a new Priority
Number
One: ensuring Jewish continuity.

Thus, where parents once rushed to enroll their children in
non-denominational public and private schools to ensure that their sons
and
daughters would mingle with other children, be accepted by other children
and ultimately become largely indistinguishable from other children, now
there is a growing groundswell of parents enrolling their children in
Jewish
schools, to ensure that their sons and daughters will mingle with other
Jews, learn about their unique culture and history and ultimately take
pride
in their religious identity. Where liberal houses of Jewish worship once
all but abandoned traditional Jewish ritual in favor of an emphasis on
universalistic themes of social justice, now there is a movement to
reclaim
Torah and mitzvot as the central defining characteristic of Jewish
religious
identity. Where the Orthodox community was once expected to vanish from
the
American scene as a historical relic confined to the dustbin of old-world
nostalgia, now Orthodoxy is widely seen as the most vital of all the
Jewish
denominational movements.

The shifting sociological pendulum in the American Jewish community may
prove to have profound implications in the areas of politics and public
policy as well. As Jews come increasingly to acknowledge the importance
of
Jewish schools, they are starting to become more receptive to governmental
policies designed to promote educational choice. As Jews come
increasingly
to explore their religious roots, they are starting to modify their
embrace
of social liberalism. As Jews come increasingly to recognize the
potential
dark side of the American melting pot and the corrosive effect of a
popular
culture that unites Americans around our nation's lowest common denominato
r,
they are starting to wonder whether free speech is in fact incompatible
with
responsible regulation.

Senator Lieberman - or at least the pre-campaign edition of Senator
Lieberman - is a good example of the transitional thinking that is taking
place in certain parts of the Jewish community. His support for school
vouchers, his strong stance on issues of personal morality, his criticism
of
the violence and smut that dominate so much of the entertainment industry,
his open embrace of and appeal for religious values in public life - these
all attest to an emerging trend within American Jewry that is beginning to
make its mark on the national scene.

Tap into that trend, Mr. President-Elect. Seek out Jewish partners as you
invite religious communities to help meet the needs of the needy through
programs of "charitable choice". Enlist Jewish support for policies that
expand parental options in education. Solicit Jewish assistance in your
efforts to elevate the level of American culture and public life.

In short, Mr. President-Elect, look beyond some of the old stereotypes of
who we are and what we think. You may be in for a surprise.

Respectfully,

David Zwiebel
Executive Vice President for Government and Public Affairs
Agudath Israel of America
--------------------------------------------------------------
Please forward this E-mail to your friends and associates.
To add yourself to our list* send your email request
to NEWS@... . In the subject field simply enter your
request
and the State you reside in. (RE: request email. State: NY)
Please advise us of any change in your E-mail address or if you no longer
desire to receive these notifications.

[* Note: this email list will not be distributed or used for solicitation
purposes]

Thank you,
Rabbi Mordechi Ort
NEWS email coordinator
212.797.9000 EXT. 79
NEWS@...













Shop online without a credit card

RocketCash, a NetZero subsidiary


Fw: Is this how it will end?!?!?!

 

Subject: FW: Is this how it will end?!?!?!

WASHINGTON, DC, Dec. 28 (news services). Marking the end of Zionism's
"territorial phase," the Barak government today announced the launching of a new virtual Israel to replace the physical Israel. In a gala ceremony at the White House to celebrate the launching of a new bid for Israeli-Palestinian peace, Prime Minister Barak explained that all Jews living in Israel would be expelled to make way for a new Arab state of Palestine, but expelled Jews would be compensated with web sites in Israeli cyberspace. The new state of Israel can be found at www.postzionism.com.

Palestinian Chairman Yassir Arafat welcomed the belated recognition of
Palestinians' legitimate national rights, but asserted that he could
not accept the proposal, as a true peace could be realized only after the
end of the Zionist occupation of other areas of the world such as the
United States. Outgoing President Bill Clinton expressed his regret
at the Palestinian decision, but asserted that the new proposal could
provide the basis for continued negotiations.

"This will involve some sacrifice by Israelis," acknowledged Barak,
"but it's worth it for peace." As a good faith measure, Barak handed the
Knesset building over to the Palestinians, who celebrated by torching
the building and then turning it into a mosque. Barak also announced
that if the Palestinians do not accept the deal, Israel will begin
unilateral implementation.

President Clinton, hosting the ceremony on his final day in office,
beamed as he explained how he launched the peace bid. "At first, we
proposed that Israel and the Palestinians split sovereignty in the
Holy Land, with Israel getting sovereignty underground and the Palestinians
getting sovereignty from the ground up," he said. "But the
Palestinians objected on the grounds that that would imply a Jewish connection to the land. I suggested that Israeli sovereignty be restricted to six feet
below surface level and under, but the Palestinians wouldn't budge;
they said that Zionist occupied graves would poison Palestinian water.
Finally, [Israeli Foreign Minister] Shlomo Ben Ami came up with the
cyberspace idea, which I think will lead to a breakthrough."

The head of Israeli military intelligence, Amos Malka, heartily
endorsed the deal. "As a non-political body, we've always told the government
that there is no military solution, and the only way to ensure that
Palestinians stop attacking us is not to be physically present in the
region." He added a caution that extremist Israeli terrorists could
seek to derail the peace deal by engaging in violent name-calling
against Barak. Israeli Justice Minister Yossi Beilin sharply rebuked
Israeli opposition leader Ariel Sharon for his war-mongering comments
that the deal involved the destruction of the state of Israel. "Sharon
is an ugly hook-nosed money-grubbing Jew who prevents peace by
supporting the racist belief that Jews should continue to exist,"
Beilin said. "If we don't want to fight forever, we have to face the fact
that our continued existence, especially in the Middle East, is an
unbearable provocation."
Despite the peace talks, tensions continued elsewhere in the world.
French police arrested several Jewish residents of Paris who verbally
attacked Palestinian demonstrators. A French police spokesman
explained that the Jews aggressively shouted "Stop!" at Palestinians who had
peacefully demonstrated by firebombing a synagogue and stoning its
worshippers. Barak expressed hope that peaceful relations could be
restored after French Jews were transferred to cyberspace. Activists
of Peace Now announced that they would soon begin daily protests against
Parisian Jews for continuing to block peace by occupying synagogues.
Meeting in an emergency session following the attack, the United
Nations Security Council voted to condemn Israel and to dispatch observers to
determine why Israel was responsible.

Shortly before the White House ceremony, a Palestinian hacker broke
into www.postzionism.com and tried to crash the site. In response, Yassir
Arafat proclaimed that "we condemn all kinds of violence," and he
expressed his hope that Israel would soon end its oppressive
occupation of cyberspace. Arafat denied any connection to the hacker, who had
mysteriously logged in on Arafat's personal account from a terminal in
Arafat's private office in Gaza.


Middle East Madness (washingtonpost.com)

Eli Shulman
 

Middle East Madness (washingtonpost.com)

Home | Register Web Search:










News Home Page
Nation
World
Metro
Business
Washtech
Sports
Style
Education
Travel
Health
Home & Garden
Opinion
Columnists
- Donna Britt
- David S. Broder
- Richard Cohen
- E. J. Dionne Jr.
- For the Record
- Fred Hiatt
- Jim Hoagland
- David Ignatius
- Robert Kagan
- Michael Kelly
- Colbert I. King
- Michael Kinsley
Charles Krauthammer
- Mary McGrory
- Courtland Milloy
- Ombudsman
- Geneva Overholser
- William Raspberry
- Stephen S. Rosenfeld
- Robert J. Samuelson
- George F. Will
- Marjorie Williams
Editorials
Letters to the Editor
Outlook
Weather
Weekly Sections
News Digest
Classifieds
Print Edition
Archives
Site Index






Middle East Madness

E-Mail This Article

Printer-Friendly Version





By Charles Krauthammer
Friday, January 12, 2001; Page A25



A lame-duck American president and a dead-duck Israeli prime minister (opposed by three-quarters of his parliament and running 28 points behind in preelection polls) are racing to try to change the Middle East landscape before they are both consigned to political oblivion. There has not been an exercise of diplomacy this irresponsible -- a breathtaking mix of narcissism and self-delusion -- since Munich 1938.


President Clinton and Prime Minister Ehud Barak are leaving the Middle East closer to a violent explosion than at any point in 30 years. Iraq has moved an armored division westward to be ready to join a general Arab war against Israel. Iran has threatened Israel with an "astonishing and unexpected" response (implying a chemical or biological missile attack) should Israel retaliate against Lebanese guerrillas who have been launching raids into Israel (this after Israel's withdrawal from Lebanon). On Jan. 1, Barak himself advised the Israeli army to begin making preparations for a major war.


Clinton and Barak call this progress, and are now desperate to codify the state of ruin they have brought the region so that their successors cannot escape from it. Except that both Clinton and Barak see not ruin but progress. The new objective, says a State Department official, "is to get a new buoy or anchor" -- some official American statement summarizing the Israeli-Palestinian negotiations -- "that states what we have achieved."


Achieved? These two men have taken a situation that was tense but nonetheless stable and torched it. Last July, in a desperate search for some legacy, Clinton tried to force a peace agreement at Camp David. Clinton was driven by narcissism. Barak was driven by delusion: the belief that if only he could make enough concessions, Yasser Arafat would sign on the dotted line and lie down with lambs.


The problem is that Arafat is no fool. He saw weakness, haste and desperation -- and refused. Barak made astonishing concessions, giving up the Temple Mount, dividing Jerusalem, relinquishing the Jordan Valley, which protects Israel from attack from the east. Arafat not only said no, he never made a counter-offer. Instead, he started a little war to put even greater pressure on Israel.


Barak's response to subsequent bus bombings and shooting into Israeli neighborhoods was to make even more concessions. Clinton, hoping for that Nobel Prize-winning photo-op, traveled from one futile meeting with Arafat to another begging for a cease-fire. Arafat, leader of a tiny, corrupt ministate, repeatedly -- and with impunity -- spurned the pleas of the leader of the supposedly hegemonic power in the Middle East.


The result? Clinton has recklessly devalued the power and prestige of his office. There was a time when the visit -- and the word -- of an American president meant something in the Arab world. Today it means nothing.


But while Clinton damaged only American prestige, Barak has irrevocably damaged Israel's security. And in return for what? Arafat's position is unchanged from where it was seven years ago when the Oslo accords were signed: 100 percent of the West Bank, all of East Jerusalem for his capital and, fatally, the resettlement of 4 million to 5 million Palestinians in Israel, thus in a single stroke demographically destroying the Jewish state.


No matter. The Clinton-Barak folie {grv}a deux grasps at "private statements" Arafat made at Camp David and in a White House meeting. This is madness. For whatever concessions Arafat may have whispered in private, he not only denies them in public, he has gotten the entire Arab League to support his unchanging, unyielding maximalist demands.


Barak's concessions did not change the Palestinian position. But they did change the American position. His legacy is to have single-handedly undermined three decades of American support for bedrock Israeli principles. For three decades, the United States supported a united Jerusalem. The Clinton plan now divides Jerusalem.


For three decades, the United States held that Israel should withdraw to secure, defensible borders. The Clinton plan has Israel giving up its critical Jordan Valley buffer zone.


What is astonishing is that these concessions are entirely unreciprocated, and without any assent from the Palestinians that they would bring peace. Indeed, the Palestinians are adamant that they will not. Thus, the first order of business for the Bush administration should be to declare itself not bound by these desperate eleventh-hour measures and to fire the entire "peace team" -- Dennis Ross, Aaron Miller and Martin Indyk -- that has brought American standing in the Middle East so low.


Clinton has indeed left a legacy: the president who has done more to undermine both American credibility and Israeli security -- albeit with the collusion of a delusional Israeli prime minister -- than any in American history.


For peace, perhaps the price might have been worth it. But look at the region. The blood flows and the cannons are being readied.




? 2001 The Washington Post Company


Previous Article Back to the top Next Article







Search


News
Post Archives


Advanced Search



Related Links

Other Articles
Re Bipartisanship (The Washington Post, 01/10/01)

Faux Commotion (The Washington Post, 01/03/01)

The Next Martha Stewart (The Washington Post, 12/20/00)

Democracy Rescued (The Washington Post, 12/14/00)

Gore's Next Task: Face Reality (The Washington Post, 12/06/00)









Home | Register Web Search:


Fw: Weekly Halacha - Parshas Shemos - Kerias HaTorah(Part 2)

Eli Shulman
 

----- Original Message -----
From: Jeffrey Gross <jgross@...>
To: <weekly-halacha@...>
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 12:08 PM
Subject: Weekly Halacha - Parshas Shemos - Kerias HaTorah(Part 2)




WEEKLY-HALACHA FOR 5761



SELECTED HALACHOS RELATING TO PARSHAS SHEMOS

By Rabbi Doniel Neustadt
Rav of Young Israel of Cleveland Heights

A discussion of Halachic topics related to the Parsha of the
week. For final rulings, consult your Rav.

HILCHOS KERIAS HaTORAH

CONSECUTIVE ALIYOS FOR RELATIVES

In order to avoid ayin harah, a "bad omen", the gabbai does not call a
father and a son or two brothers [who share a father] for consecutive
aliyos.(1) Even if the parties involved are not concerned with ayin harah
and wish to be called consecutively, it is not permitted.(2) Moreover,
even
if the gabbai mistakenly did call the relative for a consecutive aliyah,
the
one who was called should remain in his seat and not accept the aliyah(3).
If, however, the mistake was realized only after he ascended the bimah,
then
he is not instructed to descend.(4)

L'chatchillah, even brothers who share only a mother, or even a
grandfather
and his grandson, should not be called for consecutive aliyos. If,
however,
there is a need to do so, or if - b'diavad - the call to ascend to the
bimah
was already made, it is permitted for them to accept the aliyah.(5) All
other relatives may be called consecutively even l'chatchillah.

The consecutive aliyos restriction does not apply:
If the consecutive aliyah is the maftir on a day when a second sefer Torah
is read for maftir. e.g., on Yom Tov or Rosh Chodesh or when the Four
Parshios are read.(6)
If the maftir is read by a minor (one who is not yet bar mitzvah).(7)
When the names of the olim are not used when they are called for an
aliyah.
While most Ashkanezic shuls today do use names when calling the olim, in
some congregations no names are used for the shevii or acharon aliyos.(8)
To hagbahah and gelilah, provided that they are not called by name.(9)
If another person was called for his aliyah between them and that person
happened not to be in shul or was unavailable to receive his aliyah.(10)

DURING KERIAS HaTORAH: SITTING or STANDING?

Although the ba'al koreh and the person receiving the aliyah must stand
while reading from the Torah, the congregation is not required to stand.
Indeed, there are three views in the poskim as to what is preferred:
Some hold that it is preferable to stand while the Torah is being read,
since Kerias ha-Torah is compared to Matan Torah at Har Sinai where
everyone
stood.(11)
Others maintain that there is no preference and one is free to sit or
stand
as he wishes.(12)
A third view holds that it is preferable to sit while the Torah is being
read.(13)

The basic halachah follows the middle view that there is no preference and
one can choose his position. There are, however, some people who are
stringent and insist on standing while the Torah is being read.

Most poskim agree with the following:
A weak person who will find it difficult to concentrate should sit.
Between aliyos there is no reason to stand.
For Borchu and its response, everyone should stand,(14) but during the
recital of the birchos ha-Torah themselves there is no obligation to
stand.
The practice in most congregations is that everyone stands while the
Aseres
ha-dibros and Shiras ha-yam are read.(15) As with all customs, one should
not deviate from the custom of the shul where he is davening.

FOOTNOTES:

1 O.C. 141:6.

2 Mishnah Berurah 141:19. Aruch ha-Shulchan 141:8 maintains, however, that
one who is unconcerned with ayin harah may do as he wishes.

3 Be'er Heitev 141:5; Sha'arei Efrayim 1:33.

4 Mishnah Berurah 141:18.

5 Sha'arei Efrayim 1:33.

6 Mishnah Berurah 141:20. Some poskim do not recommend relying on this
leniency when no kaddish is recited between the aliyos, e.g., Chol ha-Moed
Pesach (Sha'arei Efrayim 1:32), while others are not particular about that
(Aruch ha-Shulchan 141:8). On Simchas Torah, however, all poskim are
lenient
about this; see Yechaveh Da'as 3:50.

7 Mishnah Berurah 141:20.

8 Mishnah Berurah 141:21.

9 Teshuvos Avnei Chefetz 16.

10 Sha'arei Efrayim 1:30.

11 Rama O.C. 146:4 as explained by Bach and Mishnah Berurah 19.

12 O.C. 146:6.

13 This is the view of the Arizal as understood by many of the latter
authorities, see Chesed le-Alafim 135:14; S'dei Chemed (Beis, 29); Kaf
ha-Chayim 146:20; Da'as Torah 146:4; Shulchan ha-Tahor 146:4. Note that
this
view has an early source, see Sefer ha-Machkim, pg. 15 and Teshuvos Rama
mi-Pano 91.

14 See, however, Kaf ha-Chayim 146:20-21 and Halichos Shelomo 12, note 30,
that the accepted practice is to remain seated even during Borchu.

15 Igros Moshe O.C. 4:22; Halichos Shelomo 12, note 30. See Yechaveh Da'as
6:8 for a dissenting opinion.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weekly-Halacha, Copyright 2001 by Rabbi Neustadt, Dr. Jeffrey Gross and
Torah.org. The author, Rabbi Neustadt, is the principal of Yavne
Teachers' College in Cleveland, Ohio. He is also the Magid Shiur of a
daily
Mishna Berurah class at Congregation Shomre Shabbos.

The Weekly-Halacha Series is distributed L'zchus Doniel Meir ben Hinda.
Weekly sponsorships are available - please mail to jgross@... .

The series is distributed by the Harbotzas Torah Division of Congregation
Shomre Shabbos, 1801 South Taylor Road, Cleveland Heights, Ohio 44118
HaRav Yisroel Grumer, Marah D'Asra.

This list is part of Torah.org: The Judaism Site (Project Genesis, Inc.).
Permission is granted to redistribute, but please give proper attribution
and copyright to the author and Torah.org. Both the author and Torah.org
reserve certain rights. For full information on copyrights, send email to
copyrights@... .

To begin or cancel your subscription to this class, please write to
weekly-halacha-subscribe@... or weekly-halacha-unsubscribe@...
as appropriate.

For further help, and for information on archives and subscriptions to
other classes, please ask the Torah.org Robot Gabbai, gabbai@... .

Torah.org depends upon your support. Please visit

or write to dedications@... or donations@... . Thank you!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Torah.org: The Judaism Site
17 Warren Road, Suite 2B learn@...
Baltimore, MD 21208 (410) 602-1350 FAX: 510-1053
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


Shop online without a credit card

RocketCash, a NetZero subsidiary


article

Eli Shulman
 

开云体育

The Jerusalem Post 1/18/01
?
????? THINK AGAIN: The Orthodox connection
????? By Jonathan Rosenblum
?
????? (January 18) A rather unusual solidarity mission arrived in Jerusalem this
????? week. The 160-member mission, sponsored by Agudath Israel of America,
????? arrived without fanfare or advance publicity. Even the hotel in which the
????? visitors were staying did not note their presence. They did not show the
????? flag around the country or even visit nearby Gilo.
?
????? The only thing that the group did was study Talmud in the Renaissance
????? Hotel for three days.
?
????? Each day began at 6:30 a.m. with the study of the daily folio of Talmud
????? and ended at 10 p.m.
?
????? Though a number of the participants have rabbinic ordination, none of them
????? earn their livings as rabbis. They are businessmen and professionals and
????? their participation in the three-day yarchei kalla (religious retreat)
????? entailed taking a full week off from business.
?
????? What did they come for if not to be updated on the security situation? Why
????? did they have to travel 9,600 km to sit and learn Torah?
?
????? The mission was above all a deep expression of the participants' faith
????? that the world ultimately runs, not according to inviolable laws of nature
????? and ineluctablec laws of history, but according to the will of God.
????? Nowhere is that so true as in the Land of Israel, which the Torah
????? describes as that land "upon which God's eyes rest from the beginning of
????? year until the end of the year."
?
????? The Torah contrasts the Land of Israel to Egypt. The latter draws its
????? water from the Nile, while the inhabitants of the Land are completely
????? dependent on rainfall. That dependence reminds us constantly of our
????? reliance on God.
?
????? Torah learning, says the Talmud, "protects and saves." And there is no
????? Torah learning like that of Eretz Yisrael. Its very air is said to make
????? wise those who pursue knowledge. By coming now, the participants in the
????? mission affirmed their belief that nothing they could do would have such a
????? profound effect on the situation of their fellow Jews as learning Torah in
????? the Land of Israel.
?
????? THE PARTICIPANTS in the yarchei kalla were able to forgo the usual
????? solidarity mission itinerary precisely because their bonds to Israel are
????? so strong. They had no need to publicly manifest their identification with
????? the plight of Israel's Jews by coming now; they and their children never
????? stop coming.
?
????? Nearly everyone on the mission is a frequent visitor. Almost without
????? exception, they have children currently studying or who have studied in
????? Israel, and many have children and grandchildren living here.
?
????? A few years of study in the great yeshivot of Israel is today de rigeuer
????? for American yeshiva students. The Mirrer Yeshiva alone has 1,000
????? unmarried foreign students and at least an equal number of married ones.
?
????? Well over 5,000 unmarried young Orthodox men and women are presently
????? studying in Israel. And there are at least an equal number of young
????? marrieds living here. Many of them will settle here permanently.
?
????? During the worst days of the current intifada fewer than 10% percent of
????? those students returned home, and all but a few come back immediately
????? after Succot. At a time when El Al was canceling flights to Israel right
????? and left, it had to add flights on October 28 and 29 to accommodate all
????? the returning yeshiva students.
?
????? Even Tuvia Grossman, the yeshiva student pictured on the front page of The
????? New York Times bleeding profusely after having been stabbed and having his
????? head cracked open with a rock by a group of Palestinian teenagers who
????? dragged him and his two friends from a cab on the way to the Kotel,
????? returned as soon as he completed physical therapy.
?
????? The thousands of Orthodox parents who left their children in Israel,
????? despite the horrifying pictures and State Department advisories, did so
????? not because they are unconcerned about their children's safety, but
????? because they are convinced that the benefits of study and living in Israel
????? far outweigh any dangers.
?
????? THE INTENSE Orthodox connection to Israel begins in early childhood. Every
????? Orthodox child, from a very early age spends much of his emotional,
????? imaginative life in Eretz Yisrael. At six or seven, he or she first
????? encounters the Land in God's injunction to Abraham to leave his father's
????? house and travel to "a Land that I will show you." From that moment on,
????? the Land of Israel is an ideal. It is always before us, slightly beyond
????? our grasp - "the Land I will show you."
?
????? Only 270 of the 613 mitzvot the Orthodox child studies can be performed
????? without the Land and our Temple.
?
????? When the Orthodox child studies the Binding of Isaac, he first encounters
????? Jerusalem and the Temple Mount: "And Avraham called the name of that site,
????? Hashem yireh, as it is said this day, on the mountain Hashem [God] will be
????? seen." On that mountain, Jews gathered three times a year to see and be
????? seen. There they perceived (yeru) the Divine Presence in its wholeness
????? (shalem). Jerusalem, or its synonym, Zion, is mentioned 738 times in the
????? Tanach.
?
????? Nor is the connection limited to the ideal Land described in the Torah. I
????? am frequently embarrassed to receive calls from friends in the States and
????? in England asking about events about which I have not yet heard. They seem
????? to keep a radio tuned to Israeli stations by their desk or to be updated
????? from the Internet every half hour.
?
????? Whatever Orthodox shul one prays in abroad, the prayers inevitably
????? conclude with the recitation of Psalms on Israel's behalf, and then
????? conversation turns immediately to the "situation."
?
????? American Orthodox Jews constitute the strongest supporters of Israel. The
????? late political scientist Daniel Elazar noted several years ago that the
????? affiliated American Jewish community is approximately equally divided
????? between Reform, Conservative and Orthodox Jews. Of those affiliated Jews,
????? the Orthodox are by far the most likely to visit Israel, to make aliya or
????? to speak Hebrew. And as historian Lucy Dawidowicz lamented more than a
????? decade ago, the Orthodox are virtually the only Jews who vote primarily
????? based upon their perception of Jewish interests, chief among them the
????? security of Israel's Jews.
?
????? This week's Agudath Israel mission did not come to make any political
????? statement, but its presence nevertheless makes a point that Israeli
????? policymakers would do well to heed.


Schedule Changes

 

Beginning on Shabbos Parshat Bo, both the Main Minyan (Shul) and the Young Adults Minyan (Front Bais Medrash) will synchronize their starting times for Shacharis and start at 8:45 A.M. This time will continue until we change the clock for daylight savings time. During the daylight savings months both minyanim will start Shacharis at 9:00 AM. Note that Parshat Tzav, Erev Pesach will be on a special schedule. Rabbi Shulman will be giving a shiur in Sefer Nefesh HaChaim, fifteen minutes before Shacharis each Shabbos morning in the main shul. The Gabbaim


Article

Eli Shulman
 

开云体育

You might find this interesting.
??? ??? EBS
?


Fw: Virus

Eli Shulman
 

开云体育

?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2001 6:48 PM
Subject: Virus

1. There is a new virus - WOBBLER. It will arrive on e-mail titled
> > > > "CALIFORNIA". IBM and AOL have announced that it is very
> > > > powerful, more so than Melissa, there is no remedy. It will eat all
> your
> > > > information on the hard drive and also destroys Netscape Navigator
> > > > and Microsoft Internet Explorer. Do not open anything with this
> > > > title and please pass this message on to all your contacts and
> > > > anyone who uses your e-mail facility. Not many people seem to
> > > > know about this yet so propagate it as fast as possible.
> > > >
> > > > 2. If you receive an e-mail titled? "Win A. Holiday" DO NOT open
> > > > it. It will erase everything on your hard drive. Forward this
> > > > letter to as many people as you can. This is a new, very
> > > > malicious virus.
> > >


E-mail from Hashem

Eli Shulman
 

See for yourself.



Israel Pictures

Eli Shulman
 

开云体育

Check out our website for pictures of the YI of Midwood's recent mission to Israel.
?
Continued thanks to our webmaster, Mr. Jeffrey Grunstein, for his outstanding work.
?


Fw: scary

Eli Shulman
 

Arutz Sheva News Service
<>
Tuesday, Feb. 6, 2001 / Sh'vat 13, 5761

....

8. AMERICAN-JEWISH OBJECTIONS TO POSSIBLE BUSH CANDIDATE FOR U.N.
American-Jewish leaders are urging President Bush not to name Rita Hauser
American Ambassador to the United Nations, in view of Hauser's pro-Arab
positions. A letter from the Zionist Organization of America to the
President details some aspects of the Hauser record, including the
following:
* In June 1994, she attacked Congress for insisting that Arafat
comply
with his Oslo obligations. In 1992, after then-Prime Minister Yitzchak
Rabin deported 400 Hamas terrorist leaders, Hauser publicly declared that
"the U.S. must push for return of all deportees."
* In 1988 she attacked the Republican Party platform - which was
widely
considered pro-Israel - for being "negative" and "hostile to accommodation
and compromise." That same year, five years before Oslo, Hauser and
others
met with Arafat in Sweden and reported that he was a "moderate."
* She lavished praise on the intifada of the late 1980's, noting the

Palestinian "willingness to sacrifice," their restraint in using lethal
weapons, and more. She similarly had praise for the late Syrian dictator
Hafez Assad. In 1989, she said that the fact that "Arab-Americans are
learning to use both clout and money" is "basically for the good, because
it creates a better balance."


The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged and
confidential information and is intended only for the use of the individual
and/or entity identified in the alias address of this message. If the
reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or
agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby
requested not to distribute or copy this communication. If you have received
this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone or
return e-mail and delete the original message from your system.

Thank you.


Solidarity Trip Experience

 

The attached Adobe Acrobat file is Jerry Schreck's account of the Young Israel of Midwood's Solidarity Trip to Israel.

Pictures of the trip are posted on our web site: www.yimidwood.org

If you do not have Adobe Acrobat on you computer it can be downloaded from www.adobe.com


article

Eli Shulman
 

开云体育


??????
?
?
?
????????????
????? Meet Barak's Legacy . . .
?
??????????????????????
?
?
?

????? By Charles Krauthammer
????? Friday, February 9, 2001; Page A29
?
????? Landslides are rare in Israel. The political landscape, while hopelessly
????? fractured, is as stable as the local geology. Israel has so long been
????? frozen in an insoluble existential dilemma -- how to deal with enemy
????? neighbors whose most fervent hope is Israel's destruction -- that for
????? almost two decades the country has remained quite evenly split between
????? right and left.
????? When former prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu was defeated 56 percent to
????? 44 percent in the last election 21 months ago, this was deemed so severe a
????? rebuke that he immediately gave up not only his leadership of the Likud
????? Party but his membership in parliament, and indeed politics altogether.
????? (He recently came back.)
????? This week's political burial of Prime Minister Ehud Barak, however, makes
????? Netanyahu's defeat look like a Bush-Gore squeaker. Barak was slaughtered.
????? To lose by 25 points (62.5 percent to 37.4 percent) in such a finely
????? balanced political system as Israel's is to suffer a repudiation that can
????? only be termed epic.
????? Barak had come into office with a reputation as a brainy, supremely
????? self-confident thinker with secret plans to bring peace within 15 months.
????? He turned out to be a grandiose fool. He offered to give away critical
????? strategic assets (such as the Jordan Valley) and profound national symbols
????? (such as the Temple Mount) without popular or parliamentary support, in
????? complete contradiction to his own campaign promises, and, fatally and most
????? foolishly, in return for nothing from the Palestinians.
????? Well, not nothing. He got an ongoing four-month-old guerrilla war in the
????? heartland of Israel. His is a record of bad faith and incompetence with
????? little parallel in the history of modern democratic states. For all of his
????? bravery as a soldier, Barak turned out to have no resolve, no bottom line
????? as a national leader. Barak offers peace. Arafat gives him war. Barak
????? responds with bluster, threats and ultimatums -- all hastily recanted --
????? followed by yet more concessions offered under fire.
????? Israelis are tired, and desperate for peace. But they are a brave people
????? and they don't like to be played for fools. Barak's cowering response to
????? Palestinian violence, rebuffs and insults (such as denying the Jews'
????? connection to the Temple Mount, their holy of holies) was more than
????? Israelis could take.
????? What is important to understand about the election, however, is that this
????? was a rejection not just of Barak, but of his chimerical "peace process."
????? Remember: Barak was going to bring his peace treaty to a referendum. Well,
????? he never got a treaty. But everyone knows the positions he offered and the
????? concessions he made. That was the issue in this election.
????? That is why he lost by an astounding 25 points. Yet even that
????? underestimates the depth of revulsion for the phony peace he kept claiming
????? was just around the corner. Barak was so afraid of an up or down vote on
????? his peace policies that he contrived a quasi-referendum that would pit him
????? against Ariel Sharon, a man who is anathema to enormous numbers of
????? Israelis.
????? Through the cynical maneuver of suddenly resigning the prime ministership
????? in December, he forced an election in which the voter could not say "No"
????? to Barak without saying "Yes" to Sharon. Yet so calamitous has Barak's
????? tenure been that even Sharon -- of all people, Sharon -- won the greatest
????? landslide in Israeli history.
????? Sharon is the most improbable Israeli prime minister ever elected. He is
????? old (72), widely feared and twice disgraced. There is not one Israeli in
????? 10 who would have written in his name if given a free choice for prime
????? minister. Barak's final legacy is to have made Sharon prime minister.
????? Barak's accomplice in this, of course, was Arafat. Arafat will soon begin
????? complaining -- loudly, bitterly and surely violently -- about the man he
????? just helped elect. Indeed, the very morning after the election, Sharon
????? visited the Western Wall and declared that Jerusalem is indivisible.
????? Arafat is undoubtedly discomfited. Too bad. He had almost two years with
????? the most dovish Israeli leader in history, who had offered to share
????? Jerusalem, and Arafat destroyed him by responding with disdain, impossible
????? demands and finally violence.
????? The last straw came just days before the election. Barak had made yet more
????? concessions in last-ditch talks at Taba, Egypt. He'd coaxed a conciliatory
????? communique out of Palestinian negotiators. Then the very next day, Arafat
????? was at the Davos economic conference delivering an anti-Israel diatribe so
????? hostile and vitriolic -- calling Barak's Israel "fascist" -- that it left
????? the international attendees stunned.
????? It left Israelis disgusted. In just 21 months, they had lost practically
????? all of their bargaining chips, their own personal security and now their
????? dignity too. Hence Sharon. His mandate is to restore the security,
????? relative stability and national sanity that prevailed before Barak's
????? willful utopianism plunged Israel into its current state of despondent
????? isolation and guerrilla war. He has a lot to repair.
????? ? 2001 The Washington Post Company
?
?