Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- YIMidwood
- Messages
Search
Please forward this letter to membership
From: "Yedidye Hirtenfeld" <YedidyeH@...>
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Subject: Fw: Please forward this letter to membership Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2001 09:27:07 -0500 Please forward this letter Thanks Yedidye ----- Original Message -----
From: <Vroom45@...> To: <yedidyeh@...> Sent: Monday, January 01, 2001 9:19 PM Subject: letter to membership Dear Member, A few weeks ago the Young Israel of Midwood lost a founding member of our Kehillah. Mr. Lou Rosenman was beloved by all who knew him. His devotion to our shul in all its capacities should serve as an ideal for all of us to emulate. Each one of us remember the many years he served as a Shliach Tzibbur on the Yomim Noraim. His tefillah's were an inspiration to those who were lucky enough to have davened with him. Over twenty years ago Mr. Rosenman instituted the learning of Mishnayos culminating in a yearly Siyum Mishnayos. The countless learning of Mishnayos by our Kehillah is a tremendous for his. We feel that an appropiate way to honor his memory is to dedicate a plaque listing each year"s Mishnayos learning which will hang in our Bais Hamedrash. We are sure you would like to join in this proper memorial to Mr. Lou Rosenman by contributing in his memory. Sincerely, Yedidye Hirtenfeld David Stern _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at |
Fw: Weekly Halacha - Parshas Vayigash - Kiddush
Eli Shulman
You may find this useful. - EBS
Kiddush cup.(3) For this reason, many people make certain to drink some wine whenKiddush from another person do not recite a shehakol on other beverages. This rulejuice. those who listen to someone else's Kiddush and partake of the wine and then wantmust be recited over a cup which holds at least a revi'is and at least acheekful must be drunk, still there are poskim(9) who defend this minhagYisrael.(10) They reason that schnapps is different from wine since it is normallydifferent set of measurements.(11)also recite a Borei nefashos over the schnapps, even though only a small amountRecite Kiddush on a revi'is of schnapps and drink a cheekful or a revi'is, butoz.) of mezonos must be eaten within a span of 3-4 minutes. One who failed todo so must repeat Kiddush at home before his meal. A mezonos kugel isIf that is difficult, one should drink an additional revi'is (3.3 fl. oz.) ofon the revi'is of wine he consumed for Kiddush.(19)fruit or shehakol items after Kiddush is recited if there are no mezonos itemsOther poskim(21) allow this practice only under special circumstances, such asthe case of a person who is weak and needs to eat and has no mezonosavailable. entity mixture" since the entire mixture is eaten together in one spoonful.Because the ha-adamah ingredients constitute the rov (majority) of the cholentif the cholent has a soupy consistency, no shehakol blessing is required. Thein the same spoonful as the cholent, its blessing does not exempt the rest ofthere is less barley than beans and potatoes.(25) The mezonos said over thebarley exempts all the other ingredients in the cholent. In order for the barleyto be considered the ikar, the following two conditions must be met:added to the cholent just as a binding or thickening agent,(26) or to give itcholent]; The taste of the barley must actually be noticeable in the mixture.(28)conditions are met. The proper blessing, then, is mezonos. No other blessing shouldbe made over the other ingredients.(29) If, after reciting a mezonos on thehe may be reciting an unnecessary blessing(31) (berachah she-einahtzerichah). after the mezonos has been recited over the cholent.recite a mezonos over the cake at the beginning of the kiddush while having inmind the cholent as well(34); this obviates the need for a blessing over theand the time span within which it was consumed.by eating a k'zayis of barley from the cholent.(35)Moshe O.C. 3:39; Minchas Yitzchak 10:23) while others are not particular aboutTzitz Eliezer 12:23).than half a revi'is.the kiddush cup in order to fulfill the mitzvah. The poskim, however do notnot exempt other beverages.Y.S. Elyashiv, quoted in Vezos ha-Berachah, pg. 100.]the latter poskim; see Mishnah Berurah 190:14.this to be the preferred method. The general custom, however, follows the viewof most poskim.ha-Chochmah 4:2; 5:115.Halachah, vol. 2, pg. 204).ha-Shulchan, however, do not agree, and Harav S.Z. Auerbach (Vezos ha-Berachah, pg. 94)daily Mishna Berurah class at Congregation Shomre Shabbos. or write to dedications@... or donations@... . Thank you! Shop Safely Online Without a Credit Card |
Fw:
Eli Shulman
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
----- Original Message -----
From: Pesach Lerner <plerner@...> To: Am Echad <AmEchad@...>; Full National Board <FullNationalBoard@...>; Metro NY Presidents <MetroNYPresidents@...>; Metro NY Rabbis <MetroNYRabbis@...> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 11:33 AM DO JOIN US WE WANT A LARGE REPRESENTATION PL --- PLEASE JOIN US and DISTRIBUTE THIS MESSAGE Did you see the rally in Jerusalem yesterday? Did you wish you where there? Join us at a Press conference/rally hosted by Mayor Rudolph Giuliani with the Mayor of Jerusalem Ehud Olmert, Health Minister Roni Milo and MK Nathan Sharansky Send a clear message in support of Jerusalem remaining the UNDIVIDED united capital of the Jewish people FOREVER! This Thursday, Jan. 11 at 1:30PM at City Hall Organized in assistance with MWI - Media Watch International a newly formed organization whose mission is to ensure fair, accountable, unbiased reporting of the global media on Israel, the Middle East and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. For more information contact Sharon tzur at: 212-713-0300 _____________________________ Rabbi Irwin Katsof The Jerusalem Fund of Aish HaTorah 156 West 56th Street, Suite 1201 New York, NY 10019 USA PH: (212) 713-0300 FX: (212) 713-0430 Pager: (800) 317-3350 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: <Jerusalemfund@...> From: Jerusalemfund@... Full-name: Jerusalemfund Message-ID: <17.1008a63b.278d38e6@...> Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 23:02:46 EST Subject: Fwd: Oath to Jerusalem in NYC To: Jerusalemfund@... MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: 6.0 sub 148 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=part2_c6.fbe0000.278d38e6_boundary In a message dated 1/9/2001 10:48:01 PM Eastern Standard Time, stzur@... writes: PLEASE JOIN US and DISTRIBUTE THIS MESSAGE Did you see the rally in Jerusalem yesterday? Did you wish you where there? Join us at a Press conference/rally hosted by Mayor Rudolph Giuliani with the Mayor of Jerusalem Ehud Olmert, Health Minister Roni Milo and MK Nathan Sharansky Send a clear message in support of Jerusalem remaining the UNDIVIDED united capital of the Jewish people FOREVER! This Thursday, Jan. 11 at 1:30PM at City Hall Organized in assistance with MWI - Media Watch International a newly formed organization whose mission is to ensure fair, accountable, unbiased reporting of the global media on Israel, the Middle East and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. For more information contact Sharon tzur at: 212-713-0300 _____________________________ Rabbi Irwin Katsof The Jerusalem Fund of Aish HaTorah 156 West 56th Street, Suite 1201 New York, NY 10019 USA PH: (212) 713-0300 FX: (212) 713-0430 Pager: (800) 317-3350 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-Path: <stzur@...> Received: from rly-xb04.mx.aol.com (rly-xb04.mail.aol.com [172.20.105.105]) by air-xb03.mail.aol.com (v77.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Jan 2001 22:48:01 -0500 Received: from mail5.registeredsite.com (mail5.registeredsite.com [64.224.9.14]) by rly-xb04.mx.aol.com (v77.27) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Jan 2001 22:47:54 -0500 Received: from mail.jerusalemfund.com (mail.jerusalemfund.net [209.35.137.192]) by mail5.registeredsite.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f0A3lcn12032; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 22:47:38 -0500 Received: from Elise.Flashcom.net [216.32.203.25] by mail.jerusalemfund.com (SMTPD32-5.05) id AB34797E00F6; Tue, 09 Jan 2001 22:47:00 -0500 Received: by localhost with Microsoft MAPI; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 22:47:16 -0500 Message-ID: <01C07A8E.1D83DE60.stzur@...> From: "Sharon Tzur" <stzur@...> To: "'philip.rosen@...'" <philip.rosen@...> Subject: Re: Oath to Jerusalem in NYC Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 22:47:15 -0500 Importance: high X-Priority: 1 (Highest) X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet E-mail/MAPI - 8.0.0.4211 Encoding: 23 TEXT Content-Type: text/plain PLEASE JOIN US and DISTRIBUTE THIS MESSAGE Did you see the rally in Jerusalem yesterday? Did you wish you where there? Join us at a Press conference/rally hosted by Mayor Rudolph Giuliani with the Mayor of Jerusalem Ehud Olmert, Health Minister Roni Milo and MK Nathan Sharansky Send a clear message in support of Jerusalem remaining the UNDIVIDED united capital of the Jewish people FOREVER! This Thursday, Jan. 11 at 1:30PM at City Hall Organized in assistance with MWI - Media Watch International a newly formed organization which mission is to ensure fair, accountable, unbiased reporting of the global media on Israel, the Middle East and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. For more information contact Sharon tzur at: 212-713-0300 NOTE The information contained in this email message is intended only for use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by telephone (212-310-8000), and destroy the original message. Thank you. Shop online without a credit card RocketCash, a NetZero subsidiary |
Fw: 'Peace Psychosis' In The Mideast
Eli Shulman
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
----- Original Message -----
From: Shulman, Charles <shulmc@...> To: 'Rabbi Dr. Nisson E. Shulman' <neshulman@...>; 'Rabbi Dr. Zalman Kossowsky' <rabbi@...>; 'Rabbi Eli Shulman (Yahoo)' <elishulman@...>; 'Rabbi Moshe Shulman' <shulman@...>; 'Rabbi Yaakov Neuburger' <bneub4800@...>; 'Rabbi Shlomo Hochberg' <Shlomoje@...>; 'Dr. Daniel Klapper' <daklapper@...> Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 6:07 PM Subject: 'Peace Psychosis' In The Mideast saved its worst for last.as his crowning legacy something that only the cynical or delusional couldcall a "final" Middle East "peace agreement." In three weeks Clinton will belong term is five weeks. Yet by then he hopes to have achieved a "permanent"ministries and nine U.S. presidencies, Arafat has remained so committed.Second Temple, destroyed in A.D. 70.forsaking the "right of return." That is the claimed right of up to 4 millionpeople, who left Israel during its violent birth pangs in 1948, to return to theirkill the state of Israel in its infancy, are there still camps populated by thesuicide. That right is integral to Arafat's aim, the destruction of the Jewishstate. Insistence on the right is tantamount to root-and-branch rejection of theon whatever territories he, with American help, can extort from Israel. Thisand our martyrs we will redeem Palestine." Last Wednesday, taking time outfrom deliberations about the Clinton-Barak offer, Arafat expressed optimismabout one day seeing "a Palestinian boy or a Palestinian girl raising the flagof Palestine over the walls and churches and minarets of Holy Jerusalem."Which is to say, over all of Jerusalem.rhetorical exaggeration to speak of a peace psychosis, for that is what psychoticsdo: they impose their own imaginings on others, persuading themselves... inthis instance, that after a lifetime of struggle, Arafat wanted to end his daysthat Arafat still sees himself as a conqueror, Luttwak reports that in 1998 akidnapped by Arafat henchmen, held for a week and beaten. His offense? He printed onthe worst governance in its history, as he has emboldened Arafat by makinga concession he would not consider and soon offer, and evidently heseriously considered Clinton's latest and most reckless proposals for appeasingin Tel Aviv, and in the context of his plunge in the polls, he said Israelit. And the future of the Palestinian people is prefigured in the corrupt andannihilation of the "Zionist entity." The diplomat serenely-and surreally-says optimismwho worry that, for the portion of world Jewry gathered in Israel, history mayconfidential information and is intended only for the use of the individual and/or entity identified in the alias address of this message. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby requested not to distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone or return e-mail and delete the original message from your system.
Shop online without a credit card RocketCash, a NetZero subsidiary |
Fw: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE PRESIDENT-ELECT FROM AN ORTHODOX JEWISH LEADER
Eli Shulman
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
----- Original Message -----
From: NEWS - Agudath Israel of America <news@...> To: NEWS - Agudath Israel of America <news@...> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 11:40 AM Subject: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE PRESIDENT-ELECT FROM AN ORTHODOX JEWISH LEADER Dear NEWS@... Members,is sponsoring a Yarchei Kallah Group Mission to Israel. A largeis not quite the monolith we are often portrayed as being. To be sure, thereneed to promote a domestic climate of tolerance and equal opportunity. Beyondis in a state of ferment and flux, and it is important that our nextpresident be sensitive to that reality.lies at the heart of the contemporary American Jewish experience. Our parentsearly and mid-1900's, escaping the ghettos and pogroms and concentration campsof a genocidally hostile Europe. They came, yearning to breathe free andresistance, rebuffed in their efforts to live in certain neighborhoods, join certainAmerican mainstream. Slowly but surely, those efforts succeeded. Anti-Semitism inthe murky shadows. Jews have become accepted in virtually every nook andcranny of American society - even in the once unimaginable position of runningfor Vice President of the United States. History's proverbial outsiders havethat they are in danger of fading into demographic oblivion. Intermarriagerates have skyrocketed; Jewish ignorance is rampant; Jewish identity has nohas come to acknowledge and develop strategies to achieve a new PriorityNumber One: ensuring Jewish continuity.and daughters would mingle with other children, be accepted by other childrenJewish schools, to ensure that their sons and daughters will mingle with otherpride in their religious identity. Where liberal houses of Jewish worship oncereclaim Torah and mitzvot as the central defining characteristic of Jewishreligious identity. Where the Orthodox community was once expected to vanish fromthe American scene as a historical relic confined to the dustbin of old-worldJewish denominational movements.of Jewish schools, they are starting to become more receptive to governmentalincreasingly to explore their religious roots, they are starting to modify theirembrace of social liberalism. As Jews come increasingly to recognize thepotential dark side of the American melting pot and the corrosive effect of apopular culture that unites Americans around our nation's lowest common denominator, they are starting to wonder whether free speech is in fact incompatiblewith responsible regulation.of the violence and smut that dominate so much of the entertainment industry,request and the State you reside in. (RE: request email. State: NY) Shop online without a credit card RocketCash, a NetZero subsidiary |
Fw: Is this how it will end?!?!?!
Subject: FW: Is this how it will end?!?!?!
WASHINGTON, DC, Dec. 28 (news services). Marking the end of Zionism's "territorial phase," the Barak government today announced the launching of a new virtual Israel to replace the physical Israel. In a gala ceremony at the White House to celebrate the launching of a new bid for Israeli-Palestinian peace, Prime Minister Barak explained that all Jews living in Israel would be expelled to make way for a new Arab state of Palestine, but expelled Jews would be compensated with web sites in Israeli cyberspace. The new state of Israel can be found at www.postzionism.com. Palestinian Chairman Yassir Arafat welcomed the belated recognition of Palestinians' legitimate national rights, but asserted that he could not accept the proposal, as a true peace could be realized only after the end of the Zionist occupation of other areas of the world such as the United States. Outgoing President Bill Clinton expressed his regret at the Palestinian decision, but asserted that the new proposal could provide the basis for continued negotiations. "This will involve some sacrifice by Israelis," acknowledged Barak, "but it's worth it for peace." As a good faith measure, Barak handed the Knesset building over to the Palestinians, who celebrated by torching the building and then turning it into a mosque. Barak also announced that if the Palestinians do not accept the deal, Israel will begin unilateral implementation. President Clinton, hosting the ceremony on his final day in office, beamed as he explained how he launched the peace bid. "At first, we proposed that Israel and the Palestinians split sovereignty in the Holy Land, with Israel getting sovereignty underground and the Palestinians getting sovereignty from the ground up," he said. "But the Palestinians objected on the grounds that that would imply a Jewish connection to the land. I suggested that Israeli sovereignty be restricted to six feet below surface level and under, but the Palestinians wouldn't budge; they said that Zionist occupied graves would poison Palestinian water. Finally, [Israeli Foreign Minister] Shlomo Ben Ami came up with the cyberspace idea, which I think will lead to a breakthrough." The head of Israeli military intelligence, Amos Malka, heartily endorsed the deal. "As a non-political body, we've always told the government that there is no military solution, and the only way to ensure that Palestinians stop attacking us is not to be physically present in the region." He added a caution that extremist Israeli terrorists could seek to derail the peace deal by engaging in violent name-calling against Barak. Israeli Justice Minister Yossi Beilin sharply rebuked Israeli opposition leader Ariel Sharon for his war-mongering comments that the deal involved the destruction of the state of Israel. "Sharon is an ugly hook-nosed money-grubbing Jew who prevents peace by supporting the racist belief that Jews should continue to exist," Beilin said. "If we don't want to fight forever, we have to face the fact that our continued existence, especially in the Middle East, is an unbearable provocation." Despite the peace talks, tensions continued elsewhere in the world. French police arrested several Jewish residents of Paris who verbally attacked Palestinian demonstrators. A French police spokesman explained that the Jews aggressively shouted "Stop!" at Palestinians who had peacefully demonstrated by firebombing a synagogue and stoning its worshippers. Barak expressed hope that peaceful relations could be restored after French Jews were transferred to cyberspace. Activists of Peace Now announced that they would soon begin daily protests against Parisian Jews for continuing to block peace by occupying synagogues. Meeting in an emergency session following the attack, the United Nations Security Council voted to condemn Israel and to dispatch observers to determine why Israel was responsible. Shortly before the White House ceremony, a Palestinian hacker broke into www.postzionism.com and tried to crash the site. In response, Yassir Arafat proclaimed that "we condemn all kinds of violence," and he expressed his hope that Israel would soon end its oppressive occupation of cyberspace. Arafat denied any connection to the hacker, who had mysteriously logged in on Arafat's personal account from a terminal in Arafat's private office in Gaza. |
Middle East Madness (washingtonpost.com)
Eli Shulman
Middle East Madness (washingtonpost.com)
Home | Register Web Search: News Home Page Nation World Metro Business Washtech Sports Style Education Travel Health Home & Garden Opinion Columnists - Donna Britt - David S. Broder - Richard Cohen - E. J. Dionne Jr. - For the Record - Fred Hiatt - Jim Hoagland - David Ignatius - Robert Kagan - Michael Kelly - Colbert I. King - Michael Kinsley Charles Krauthammer - Mary McGrory - Courtland Milloy - Ombudsman - Geneva Overholser - William Raspberry - Stephen S. Rosenfeld - Robert J. Samuelson - George F. Will - Marjorie Williams Editorials Letters to the Editor Outlook Weather Weekly Sections News Digest Classifieds Print Edition Archives Site Index Middle East Madness E-Mail This Article Printer-Friendly Version By Charles Krauthammer Friday, January 12, 2001; Page A25 A lame-duck American president and a dead-duck Israeli prime minister (opposed by three-quarters of his parliament and running 28 points behind in preelection polls) are racing to try to change the Middle East landscape before they are both consigned to political oblivion. There has not been an exercise of diplomacy this irresponsible -- a breathtaking mix of narcissism and self-delusion -- since Munich 1938. President Clinton and Prime Minister Ehud Barak are leaving the Middle East closer to a violent explosion than at any point in 30 years. Iraq has moved an armored division westward to be ready to join a general Arab war against Israel. Iran has threatened Israel with an "astonishing and unexpected" response (implying a chemical or biological missile attack) should Israel retaliate against Lebanese guerrillas who have been launching raids into Israel (this after Israel's withdrawal from Lebanon). On Jan. 1, Barak himself advised the Israeli army to begin making preparations for a major war. Clinton and Barak call this progress, and are now desperate to codify the state of ruin they have brought the region so that their successors cannot escape from it. Except that both Clinton and Barak see not ruin but progress. The new objective, says a State Department official, "is to get a new buoy or anchor" -- some official American statement summarizing the Israeli-Palestinian negotiations -- "that states what we have achieved." Achieved? These two men have taken a situation that was tense but nonetheless stable and torched it. Last July, in a desperate search for some legacy, Clinton tried to force a peace agreement at Camp David. Clinton was driven by narcissism. Barak was driven by delusion: the belief that if only he could make enough concessions, Yasser Arafat would sign on the dotted line and lie down with lambs. The problem is that Arafat is no fool. He saw weakness, haste and desperation -- and refused. Barak made astonishing concessions, giving up the Temple Mount, dividing Jerusalem, relinquishing the Jordan Valley, which protects Israel from attack from the east. Arafat not only said no, he never made a counter-offer. Instead, he started a little war to put even greater pressure on Israel. Barak's response to subsequent bus bombings and shooting into Israeli neighborhoods was to make even more concessions. Clinton, hoping for that Nobel Prize-winning photo-op, traveled from one futile meeting with Arafat to another begging for a cease-fire. Arafat, leader of a tiny, corrupt ministate, repeatedly -- and with impunity -- spurned the pleas of the leader of the supposedly hegemonic power in the Middle East. The result? Clinton has recklessly devalued the power and prestige of his office. There was a time when the visit -- and the word -- of an American president meant something in the Arab world. Today it means nothing. But while Clinton damaged only American prestige, Barak has irrevocably damaged Israel's security. And in return for what? Arafat's position is unchanged from where it was seven years ago when the Oslo accords were signed: 100 percent of the West Bank, all of East Jerusalem for his capital and, fatally, the resettlement of 4 million to 5 million Palestinians in Israel, thus in a single stroke demographically destroying the Jewish state. No matter. The Clinton-Barak folie {grv}a deux grasps at "private statements" Arafat made at Camp David and in a White House meeting. This is madness. For whatever concessions Arafat may have whispered in private, he not only denies them in public, he has gotten the entire Arab League to support his unchanging, unyielding maximalist demands. Barak's concessions did not change the Palestinian position. But they did change the American position. His legacy is to have single-handedly undermined three decades of American support for bedrock Israeli principles. For three decades, the United States supported a united Jerusalem. The Clinton plan now divides Jerusalem. For three decades, the United States held that Israel should withdraw to secure, defensible borders. The Clinton plan has Israel giving up its critical Jordan Valley buffer zone. What is astonishing is that these concessions are entirely unreciprocated, and without any assent from the Palestinians that they would bring peace. Indeed, the Palestinians are adamant that they will not. Thus, the first order of business for the Bush administration should be to declare itself not bound by these desperate eleventh-hour measures and to fire the entire "peace team" -- Dennis Ross, Aaron Miller and Martin Indyk -- that has brought American standing in the Middle East so low. Clinton has indeed left a legacy: the president who has done more to undermine both American credibility and Israeli security -- albeit with the collusion of a delusional Israeli prime minister -- than any in American history. For peace, perhaps the price might have been worth it. But look at the region. The blood flows and the cannons are being readied. ? 2001 The Washington Post Company Previous Article Back to the top Next Article Search News Post Archives Advanced Search Related Links Other Articles Re Bipartisanship (The Washington Post, 01/10/01) Faux Commotion (The Washington Post, 01/03/01) The Next Martha Stewart (The Washington Post, 12/20/00) Democracy Rescued (The Washington Post, 12/14/00) Gore's Next Task: Face Reality (The Washington Post, 12/06/00) Home | Register Web Search: |
Fw: Weekly Halacha - Parshas Shemos - Kerias HaTorah(Part 2)
Eli Shulman
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
----- Original Message -----
From: Jeffrey Gross <jgross@...> To: <weekly-halacha@...> Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 12:08 PM Subject: Weekly Halacha - Parshas Shemos - Kerias HaTorah(Part 2) even if the gabbai mistakenly did call the relative for a consecutive aliyah,the one who was called should remain in his seat and not accept the aliyah(3).then he is not instructed to descend.(4)grandfather and his grandson, should not be called for consecutive aliyos. If,however, there is a need to do so, or if - b'diavad - the call to ascend to thebimah was already made, it is permitted for them to accept the aliyah.(5) Allaliyah. While most Ashkanezic shuls today do use names when calling the olim, ineveryone stood.(11)stand as he wishes.(12)stand. The practice in most congregations is that everyone stands while theAseres ha-dibros and Shiras ha-yam are read.(15) As with all customs, one shouldlenient about this; see Yechaveh Da'as 3:50.this view has an early source, see Sefer ha-Machkim, pg. 15 and Teshuvos Ramadaily Mishna Berurah class at Congregation Shomre Shabbos. or write to dedications@... or donations@... . Thank you! Shop online without a credit card RocketCash, a NetZero subsidiary |
article
Eli Shulman
开云体育The Jerusalem Post 1/18/01
?
????? THINK AGAIN: The
Orthodox connection
????? By Jonathan Rosenblum ?
????? (January 18) A
rather unusual solidarity mission arrived in Jerusalem this
????? week. The 160-member mission, sponsored by Agudath Israel of America, ????? arrived without fanfare or advance publicity. Even the hotel in which the ????? visitors were staying did not note their presence. They did not show the ????? flag around the country or even visit nearby Gilo. ?
????? The only thing that
the group did was study Talmud in the Renaissance
????? Hotel for three days. ?
????? Each day began at
6:30 a.m. with the study of the daily folio of Talmud
????? and ended at 10 p.m. ?
????? Though a number of
the participants have rabbinic ordination, none of them
????? earn their livings as rabbis. They are businessmen and professionals and ????? their participation in the three-day yarchei kalla (religious retreat) ????? entailed taking a full week off from business. ?
????? What did they come
for if not to be updated on the security situation? Why
????? did they have to travel 9,600 km to sit and learn Torah? ?
????? The mission was
above all a deep expression of the participants' faith
????? that the world ultimately runs, not according to inviolable laws of nature ????? and ineluctablec laws of history, but according to the will of God. ????? Nowhere is that so true as in the Land of Israel, which the Torah ????? describes as that land "upon which God's eyes rest from the beginning of ????? year until the end of the year." ?
????? The Torah contrasts
the Land of Israel to Egypt. The latter draws its
????? water from the Nile, while the inhabitants of the Land are completely ????? dependent on rainfall. That dependence reminds us constantly of our ????? reliance on God. ?
????? Torah learning, says
the Talmud, "protects and saves." And there is no
????? Torah learning like that of Eretz Yisrael. Its very air is said to make ????? wise those who pursue knowledge. By coming now, the participants in the ????? mission affirmed their belief that nothing they could do would have such a ????? profound effect on the situation of their fellow Jews as learning Torah in ????? the Land of Israel. ?
????? THE PARTICIPANTS in
the yarchei kalla were able to forgo the usual
????? solidarity mission itinerary precisely because their bonds to Israel are ????? so strong. They had no need to publicly manifest their identification with ????? the plight of Israel's Jews by coming now; they and their children never ????? stop coming. ?
????? Nearly everyone on
the mission is a frequent visitor. Almost without
????? exception, they have children currently studying or who have studied in ????? Israel, and many have children and grandchildren living here. ?
????? A few years of study
in the great yeshivot of Israel is today de rigeuer
????? for American yeshiva students. The Mirrer Yeshiva alone has 1,000 ????? unmarried foreign students and at least an equal number of married ones. ?
????? Well over 5,000
unmarried young Orthodox men and women are presently
????? studying in Israel. And there are at least an equal number of young ????? marrieds living here. Many of them will settle here permanently. ?
????? During the worst
days of the current intifada fewer than 10% percent of
????? those students returned home, and all but a few come back immediately ????? after Succot. At a time when El Al was canceling flights to Israel right ????? and left, it had to add flights on October 28 and 29 to accommodate all ????? the returning yeshiva students. ?
????? Even Tuvia Grossman,
the yeshiva student pictured on the front page of The
????? New York Times bleeding profusely after having been stabbed and having his ????? head cracked open with a rock by a group of Palestinian teenagers who ????? dragged him and his two friends from a cab on the way to the Kotel, ????? returned as soon as he completed physical therapy. ?
????? The thousands of
Orthodox parents who left their children in Israel,
????? despite the horrifying pictures and State Department advisories, did so ????? not because they are unconcerned about their children's safety, but ????? because they are convinced that the benefits of study and living in Israel ????? far outweigh any dangers. ?
????? THE INTENSE Orthodox
connection to Israel begins in early childhood. Every
????? Orthodox child, from a very early age spends much of his emotional, ????? imaginative life in Eretz Yisrael. At six or seven, he or she first ????? encounters the Land in God's injunction to Abraham to leave his father's ????? house and travel to "a Land that I will show you." From that moment on, ????? the Land of Israel is an ideal. It is always before us, slightly beyond ????? our grasp - "the Land I will show you." ?
????? Only 270 of the 613
mitzvot the Orthodox child studies can be performed
????? without the Land and our Temple. ?
????? When the Orthodox
child studies the Binding of Isaac, he first encounters
????? Jerusalem and the Temple Mount: "And Avraham called the name of that site, ????? Hashem yireh, as it is said this day, on the mountain Hashem [God] will be ????? seen." On that mountain, Jews gathered three times a year to see and be ????? seen. There they perceived (yeru) the Divine Presence in its wholeness ????? (shalem). Jerusalem, or its synonym, Zion, is mentioned 738 times in the ????? Tanach. ?
????? Nor is the
connection limited to the ideal Land described in the Torah. I
????? am frequently embarrassed to receive calls from friends in the States and ????? in England asking about events about which I have not yet heard. They seem ????? to keep a radio tuned to Israeli stations by their desk or to be updated ????? from the Internet every half hour. ?
????? Whatever Orthodox
shul one prays in abroad, the prayers inevitably
????? conclude with the recitation of Psalms on Israel's behalf, and then ????? conversation turns immediately to the "situation." ?
????? American Orthodox
Jews constitute the strongest supporters of Israel. The
????? late political scientist Daniel Elazar noted several years ago that the ????? affiliated American Jewish community is approximately equally divided ????? between Reform, Conservative and Orthodox Jews. Of those affiliated Jews, ????? the Orthodox are by far the most likely to visit Israel, to make aliya or ????? to speak Hebrew. And as historian Lucy Dawidowicz lamented more than a ????? decade ago, the Orthodox are virtually the only Jews who vote primarily ????? based upon their perception of Jewish interests, chief among them the ????? security of Israel's Jews. ?
????? This week's Agudath
Israel mission did not come to make any political
????? statement, but its presence nevertheless makes a point that Israeli ????? policymakers would do well to heed. |
Schedule Changes
Beginning on Shabbos Parshat Bo, both the Main Minyan (Shul) and the Young
Adults Minyan (Front Bais Medrash) will synchronize their starting times for
Shacharis and start at 8:45 A.M.
This time will continue until we change the clock for daylight savings time. During the daylight savings months both minyanim will start Shacharis at 9:00 AM.
Note that Parshat Tzav, Erev Pesach will be on a special schedule.
Rabbi Shulman will be giving a shiur in Sefer Nefesh HaChaim, fifteen
minutes before Shacharis each Shabbos morning in the main shul.
The Gabbaim
|
Fw: Virus
Eli Shulman
开云体育?
----- Original Message -----
From: Hcfertig@...
To: Rabbi36@...
Cc: fertig@... ; afertig@... ; ChaniFertig@... ; mFertig@... ; Tovmike@... ; Shepsy@... ; PENMIR@... ; YedidyeH@... ; ileiderman@... ; Mathemt@... ; hbmandel@... ; DiamndMn1@... ;
erosenfeld@... ; Daysgh@... ; MANTIS1012@...
; Elishulman@...
Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2001 6:48 PM
Subject: Virus > > > > "CALIFORNIA". IBM and AOL have announced that it is very > > > > powerful, more so than Melissa, there is no remedy. It will eat all > your > > > > information on the hard drive and also destroys Netscape Navigator > > > > and Microsoft Internet Explorer. Do not open anything with this > > > > title and please pass this message on to all your contacts and > > > > anyone who uses your e-mail facility. Not many people seem to > > > > know about this yet so propagate it as fast as possible. > > > > > > > > 2. If you receive an e-mail titled? "Win A. Holiday" DO NOT open > > > > it. It will erase everything on your hard drive. Forward this > > > > letter to as many people as you can. This is a new, very > > > > malicious virus. > > > |
Fw: scary
Eli Shulman
Arutz Sheva News Service
<> Tuesday, Feb. 6, 2001 / Sh'vat 13, 5761 .... 8. AMERICAN-JEWISH OBJECTIONS TO POSSIBLE BUSH CANDIDATE FOR U.N. American-Jewish leaders are urging President Bush not to name Rita Hauser American Ambassador to the United Nations, in view of Hauser's pro-Arab positions. A letter from the Zionist Organization of America to the President details some aspects of the Hauser record, including the following: * In June 1994, she attacked Congress for insisting that Arafat comply with his Oslo obligations. In 1992, after then-Prime Minister Yitzchak Rabin deported 400 Hamas terrorist leaders, Hauser publicly declared that "the U.S. must push for return of all deportees." * In 1988 she attacked the Republican Party platform - which was widely considered pro-Israel - for being "negative" and "hostile to accommodation and compromise." That same year, five years before Oslo, Hauser and others met with Arafat in Sweden and reported that he was a "moderate." * She lavished praise on the intifada of the late 1980's, noting the Palestinian "willingness to sacrifice," their restraint in using lethal weapons, and more. She similarly had praise for the late Syrian dictator Hafez Assad. In 1989, she said that the fact that "Arab-Americans are learning to use both clout and money" is "basically for the good, because it creates a better balance." The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged and confidential information and is intended only for the use of the individual and/or entity identified in the alias address of this message. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby requested not to distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone or return e-mail and delete the original message from your system. Thank you. |
article
Eli Shulman
开云体育?????? ?
?
?
????????????
????? Meet Barak's Legacy . . . ?
??????????????????????
?
?
?
????? By Charles Krauthammer ????? Friday, February 9, 2001; Page A29 ?
????? Landslides are rare
in Israel. The political landscape, while hopelessly
????? fractured, is as stable as the local geology. Israel has so long been ????? frozen in an insoluble existential dilemma -- how to deal with enemy ????? neighbors whose most fervent hope is Israel's destruction -- that for ????? almost two decades the country has remained quite evenly split between ????? right and left. ????? When former prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu was defeated 56 percent to ????? 44 percent in the last election 21 months ago, this was deemed so severe a ????? rebuke that he immediately gave up not only his leadership of the Likud ????? Party but his membership in parliament, and indeed politics altogether. ????? (He recently came back.) ????? This week's political burial of Prime Minister Ehud Barak, however, makes ????? Netanyahu's defeat look like a Bush-Gore squeaker. Barak was slaughtered. ????? To lose by 25 points (62.5 percent to 37.4 percent) in such a finely ????? balanced political system as Israel's is to suffer a repudiation that can ????? only be termed epic. ????? Barak had come into office with a reputation as a brainy, supremely ????? self-confident thinker with secret plans to bring peace within 15 months. ????? He turned out to be a grandiose fool. He offered to give away critical ????? strategic assets (such as the Jordan Valley) and profound national symbols ????? (such as the Temple Mount) without popular or parliamentary support, in ????? complete contradiction to his own campaign promises, and, fatally and most ????? foolishly, in return for nothing from the Palestinians. ????? Well, not nothing. He got an ongoing four-month-old guerrilla war in the ????? heartland of Israel. His is a record of bad faith and incompetence with ????? little parallel in the history of modern democratic states. For all of his ????? bravery as a soldier, Barak turned out to have no resolve, no bottom line ????? as a national leader. Barak offers peace. Arafat gives him war. Barak ????? responds with bluster, threats and ultimatums -- all hastily recanted -- ????? followed by yet more concessions offered under fire. ????? Israelis are tired, and desperate for peace. But they are a brave people ????? and they don't like to be played for fools. Barak's cowering response to ????? Palestinian violence, rebuffs and insults (such as denying the Jews' ????? connection to the Temple Mount, their holy of holies) was more than ????? Israelis could take. ????? What is important to understand about the election, however, is that this ????? was a rejection not just of Barak, but of his chimerical "peace process." ????? Remember: Barak was going to bring his peace treaty to a referendum. Well, ????? he never got a treaty. But everyone knows the positions he offered and the ????? concessions he made. That was the issue in this election. ????? That is why he lost by an astounding 25 points. Yet even that ????? underestimates the depth of revulsion for the phony peace he kept claiming ????? was just around the corner. Barak was so afraid of an up or down vote on ????? his peace policies that he contrived a quasi-referendum that would pit him ????? against Ariel Sharon, a man who is anathema to enormous numbers of ????? Israelis. ????? Through the cynical maneuver of suddenly resigning the prime ministership ????? in December, he forced an election in which the voter could not say "No" ????? to Barak without saying "Yes" to Sharon. Yet so calamitous has Barak's ????? tenure been that even Sharon -- of all people, Sharon -- won the greatest ????? landslide in Israeli history. ????? Sharon is the most improbable Israeli prime minister ever elected. He is ????? old (72), widely feared and twice disgraced. There is not one Israeli in ????? 10 who would have written in his name if given a free choice for prime ????? minister. Barak's final legacy is to have made Sharon prime minister. ????? Barak's accomplice in this, of course, was Arafat. Arafat will soon begin ????? complaining -- loudly, bitterly and surely violently -- about the man he ????? just helped elect. Indeed, the very morning after the election, Sharon ????? visited the Western Wall and declared that Jerusalem is indivisible. ????? Arafat is undoubtedly discomfited. Too bad. He had almost two years with ????? the most dovish Israeli leader in history, who had offered to share ????? Jerusalem, and Arafat destroyed him by responding with disdain, impossible ????? demands and finally violence. ????? The last straw came just days before the election. Barak had made yet more ????? concessions in last-ditch talks at Taba, Egypt. He'd coaxed a conciliatory ????? communique out of Palestinian negotiators. Then the very next day, Arafat ????? was at the Davos economic conference delivering an anti-Israel diatribe so ????? hostile and vitriolic -- calling Barak's Israel "fascist" -- that it left ????? the international attendees stunned. ????? It left Israelis disgusted. In just 21 months, they had lost practically ????? all of their bargaining chips, their own personal security and now their ????? dignity too. Hence Sharon. His mandate is to restore the security, ????? relative stability and national sanity that prevailed before Barak's ????? willful utopianism plunged Israel into its current state of despondent ????? isolation and guerrilla war. He has a lot to repair. ????? ? 2001 The Washington Post Company ?
? |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss