¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Re: Feedback into T41
try 1:1 between your tuner and the T41. Best regards, Jack Mann W1QZ [email protected]> wrote:
By john mann · #33003 ·
Re: Feedback into T41
I used to have issues with my FT901 like that, CW would stick in transmit- RF in the shack. A ferrite slug with 6 wraps of the shielded CW key lead after it left the external keyer fixed it. My EFHW
By Larry Acklin · #33002 ·
Re: T41 V66.4 with Code Revisions
OK, just had not heard it used that way.
By jjpurdum · #33001 ·
Re: T41 V66.4 with Code Revisions
Hi Al, Ver 066_4 is a "Winner,Winner, Chicken Dinner" as a couple of T41 experts I know would say. I was able to calibrate Xmit IQ all bands without a problem using the receiver of my FT991A. Had a
By Rick Price · #33000 ·
Feedback into T41
Hello all, I was trying out my station with a second antenna - an 65-foot End Fed Half Wave. I had built it to the kilowatt level, with a big toroid core on the matching transformer. Instead of a
By jerry-KF6VB · #32999 ·
Re: T41 V66.4 with Code Revisions
Come now Jack.... I'm sure you have heard the term "cracked the case" before... same deal.... :)) [email protected]> wrote:
By Peter McCracken EI3JCB · #32998 ·
Re: T41 V66.4 with Code Revisions
Well you would want this to read out in WATTS¡­ not db reduction¡­ Dr. William J. Schmidt - K9HZ J68HZ 8P6HK ZF2HZ PJ4/K9HZ VP5/K9HZ PJ2/K9HZ VP2EHZ Owner - Operator Big Signal Ranch ¨C K9ZC
By K9HZ · #32997 ·
Re: T41 V66.4 with Code Revisions
Roger, It is working correctly, but the readout is confusing. Next round I will fix it to read in dB, from 0 to -31dB. Thanks, Al AC8GY
By Albert Peter · #32996 ·
Re: [AmateurRadioBuilders] Alternative to Pico?
No. Standard IDE.Jack, W8TEE
By jjpurdum · #32995 ·
Re: [AmateurRadioBuilders] Alternative to Pico?
*** Hardware debug? - Jerry, KF6VB
By jerry-KF6VB · #32994 ·
Re: [AmateurRadioBuilders] RP Pico 2
You didn't read what I said. Each "page" (your term, not mine) is a segment of the display and only that gets updated. Jack, W8TEE
By jjpurdum · #32993 ·
Re: [AmateurRadioBuilders] RP Pico 2
*** It should be more granular than that. If a new S-meter reading comes in, the Pico shouldn't have to update the entire display. - Jerry,KF6VB
By jerry-KF6VB · #32992 ·
Re: [AmateurRadioBuilders] RP Pico 2
I think the Teensy could work with only 3 function calls to the Pico (or whatever??) processor for each page: ??? 1. Show -- present the default page being called. Essentially, one page for each
By jjpurdum · #32991 ·
Re: T41 V66.4 with Code Revisions
You've solved the problem with TX calibrate! One thing I have just noticed is that RF Out Atten seems to work in reverse. The higher the number the greater the output. Roger G8JWT
By bty84827531 · #32990 ·
Re: RP Pico 2
Its the original pico not the pico 2 that got the speed bump. Gary W9TD
By Gary W9TD · #32989 ·
Re: [AmateurRadioBuilders] RP Pico 2
I actually have a couple pico 2's. No wifi, though. It does do SPI, so it could control our current display - assuming that there's an RA8875 library available. The first step would be to isolate all
By jerry-KF6VB · #32988 ·
Re: T41 V66.4 with Code Revisions
For us Colonials who aren't too bright, what does "cracked it" mean? Jack, W8TEE
By jjpurdum · #32987 ·
Re: T41 V66.4 with Code Revisions
For us Colonials who aren't too bright, what does "cracked it" mean? Jack, W8TEE
By jjpurdum · #32986 ·
Re: T41 V66.4 with Code Revisions
First impression is that 66.4 has cracked it. Thanks Roger G8JWT
By bty84827531 · #32985 ·
Re: slow starting on T41 kit
The Main, RF, BPF, encoder boards, offset, etc are all public and part of the T41. MY K9HZ 20W PA, 100W PA, LPF, Antenna Tuner, etc are all my design that I sell for multiple radios in addition to the
By K9HZ · #32984 ·