Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- SoftwareControlledHamRadio
- Messages
Search
Re: T41 V66.4 with Code Revisions
Hi Al,
Ver 066_4 is a "Winner,Winner, Chicken Dinner" as a couple of T41 experts I know would say. I was able to calibrate Xmit IQ all bands without a problem using the receiver of my FT991A. Had a couple of minor issues, one with display, which you are probably aware of. When adjusting IQ Phase with .001 resolution the last digit appears to not being erased but overwritten with the new numbert and after a couple of twists of the dial you cannot read the number. I have also copied the EEPROM dump and SD card dump (attached PDF) after copying EEPROM to SD and it looks like a formatting issue in the EEPROM Dump first line. The 80M number seems to not being copied into the SD, throwing the number to band correlation off. Not sure how that would affect the order and placement and did not want to try coping the SD back to EEPROM for fear of shifting the placement order. Thanks again for getting this working correctly. Rick, KN4AIE On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 8:26?AM Albert Peter via groups.io <albertfpeter@...> wrote:
|
Feedback into T41
Hello all,
I was trying out my station with a second antenna - an 65-foot End Fed Half Wave. I had built it to the kilowatt level, with a big toroid core on the matching transformer. Instead of a counterpoise, I used an 8-foot ground rod - the kind they sell to ground your house. Probably needs a counterpoise also... The far end of the antenna is supported by a monster oak tree on my property. Got it up there with a slingshot. I hooked up a spare MFJ998RT autotuner to the EFHW and thence to my station through a 40-foot length of Davis Buryflex RG/8. It worked fine on the base T41 - decent SWR on 40, 20 & 15M. And it actually worked on 80 - although the autotuner was clearly struggling. HOWEVER, when I turned on my KW amp, I pushed the PTT, and the power immediately rose to 950W or so out...without me talking. And somebody on the frequency said "what's that noise?". I figure that RF is getting back into the T41. Probably need to stick a counterpoise on the EFHW, and maybe a common mode choke. My main antenna does not give me any such problems; it's a trap vertical up the hill, and it has an excellent ground - an Ufer ground, consisting of 80 feet of thick copper wire embedded in a 10 by 70' concrete slab. I'm trying the EFHW to see if it's any quieter than my vertical. So far, it's about the same. - Jerry, KF6VB |
Re: T41 V66.4 with Code Revisions
Come now Jack.... I'm sure you have heard the term "cracked the case" before... same deal.... :)) On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 at 18:48, K9HZ via <bill=[email protected]> wrote:
|
Re: T41 V66.4 with Code Revisions
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýWell you would want this to read out in WATTS¡ not db reduction¡ ? ? Dr. William J. Schmidt - K9HZ J68HZ 8P6HK ZF2HZ PJ4/K9HZ VP5/K9HZ PJ2/K9HZ VP2EHZ ? Owner - Operator Big Signal Ranch ¨C K9ZC Staunton, Illinois ? Owner ¨C Operator Villa Grand Piton ¨C J68HZ Soufriere, St. Lucia W.I. Rent it: ? Moderator: North American QRO Group at Groups.IO. Moderator: Amateur Radio Builders Group at Groups.IO. ? email:? bill@... ? ? From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Albert Peter via groups.io
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2025 11:44 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [SoftwareControlledHamRadio] T41 V66.4 with Code Revisions ? Roger, It is working correctly, but the readout is confusing. Next round I will fix it to read in dB, from 0 to -31dB. Thanks, Al AC8GY |
Re: [AmateurRadioBuilders] Alternative to Pico?
No. Standard IDE. Jack, W8TEE
On Friday, February 28, 2025 at 12:21:16 PM EST, jerry-KF6VB <jerry@...> wrote:
On 2025-02-28 06:29, Jack, W8TEE via groups.io wrote: > All: > > I've also experimented with the XIAO processor from Seeed Studio. It's > about the size of your thumbnail and costs $5: *** Hardware debug? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? - Jerry, KF6VB -- Jack, W8TEE |
Re: [AmateurRadioBuilders] RP Pico 2
You didn't read what I said. Each "page" (your term, not mine) is a segment of the display and only that gets updated. Jack, W8TEE
On Friday, February 28, 2025 at 12:13:08 PM EST, jerry-KF6VB <jerry@...> wrote:
On 2025-02-28 08:46, jjpurdum via groups.io wrote: > I think the Teensy could work with only 3 function calls to the Pico > (or whatever??) processor for each page: *** It should be more granular than that.? If a new S-meter reading comes in, the Pico shouldn't have to update the entire display. ? ? ? ? ? ? ? - Jerry,KF6VB -- Jack, W8TEE |
Re: [AmateurRadioBuilders] RP Pico 2
On 2025-02-28 08:46, jjpurdum via groups.io wrote:
I think the Teensy could work with only 3 function calls to the Pico*** It should be more granular than that. If a new S-meter reading comes in, the Pico shouldn't have to update the entire display. - Jerry,KF6VB |
Re: [AmateurRadioBuilders] RP Pico 2
I think the Teensy could work with only 3 function calls to the Pico (or whatever??) processor for each page: ??? 1. Show -- present the default page being called. Essentially, one page for each new screen. By new, I mean overlays ??????????? on the display surface (e.g., Info Window, waterfall, spectrum, audio plot, S-meter). Some of these are in a tight ??????????? loop controlled by the Teensy (e.g., spectrum). ??? 2. Update -- if new info comes to the Teensy, it can be forwarded to update that page on the screen. ??? 3. Close -- that page is removed from the display, leaving a black background in its place. If written correctly, the second processor could almost be anything that has a decent clock speed and memory. Keep in mind that the display supports the Block Transfer Engine (BTE) that can speed things up on the display updates. Jack, W8TEE
On Friday, February 28, 2025 at 11:31:42 AM EST, jerry-KF6VB <jerry@...> wrote:
On 2025-02-28 06:06, Jack, W8TEE via groups.io wrote: > All: > > I just read that the RP Pico 2 is now capable of running at 200MHz ? I actually have a couple pico 2's.? No wifi, though.? It does do SPI, so it could control our current display - assuming that there's an RA8875 library available. ? The first step would be to isolate all access to the display.? Make sure it's all in one file.? I would use C++ objects to encapsulate it.? Pages and items. A "page" would be an entire display - say the normal radio display.? Or the BIT test display.? Or the IQ calibrate display.? An "item" would be one of the things that the page displays. ? Once something like that was in place, it would be straightforward to substitute "page" calls with calls to a different file that squirted the info out to the Pico. The object of the exercise is to minimize this info.? Only the Pico would know exactly where on the screen something goes, for example. ? So if the Teensy can just say "display the main screen" to the Pico, that's a lot less work for the Teensy.? There's no way around sending the individual readings for the spectrum.? But the Pico would maintain the waterfall. ? The Pico supports hardware debug, so development could be relatively fast. ? A quick websearch revealed that there IS a working RA8875 library for the Pico. ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? - Jerry, KF6VB -- Jack, W8TEE |
Re: [AmateurRadioBuilders] RP Pico 2
On 2025-02-28 06:06, Jack, W8TEE via groups.io wrote:
All:I actually have a couple pico 2's. No wifi, though. It does do SPI, so it could control our current display - assuming that there's an RA8875 library available. The first step would be to isolate all access to the display. Make sure it's all in one file. I would use C++ objects to encapsulate it. Pages and items. A "page" would be an entire display - say the normal radio display. Or the BIT test display. Or the IQ calibrate display. An "item" would be one of the things that the page displays. Once something like that was in place, it would be straightforward to substitute "page" calls with calls to a different file that squirted the info out to the Pico. The object of the exercise is to minimize this info. Only the Pico would know exactly where on the screen something goes, for example. So if the Teensy can just say "display the main screen" to the Pico, that's a lot less work for the Teensy. There's no way around sending the individual readings for the spectrum. But the Pico would maintain the waterfall. The Pico supports hardware debug, so development could be relatively fast. A quick websearch revealed that there IS a working RA8875 library for the Pico. - Jerry, KF6VB |
Re: slow starting on T41 kit
The Main, RF, BPF, encoder boards, offset, etc are all public and part of
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
the T41. MY K9HZ 20W PA, 100W PA, LPF, Antenna Tuner, etc are all my design that I sell for multiple radios in addition to the T41... so the only thing I don't provide with those are the gerbers. Dr. William J. Schmidt - K9HZ J68HZ 8P6HK ZF2HZ PJ4/K9HZ VP5/K9HZ PJ2/K9HZ VP2EHZ Owner - Operator Big Signal Ranch ¨C K9ZC Staunton, Illinois Owner ¨C Operator Villa Grand Piton ¨C J68HZ Soufriere, St. Lucia W.I. Rent it: www.VillaGrandPiton.com Moderator: North American QRO Group at Groups.IO. Moderator: Amateur Radio Builders Group at Groups.IO. email:? bill@... -----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of jerry-KF6VB Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2025 12:21 PM To: [email protected] Cc: Tim via groups.io <w4yn@...> Subject: Re: [SoftwareControlledHamRadio] slow starting on T41 kit On 2025-02-27 06:03, Tim via groups.io wrote: I can view and down load PDF's fine. I think some of the V12*** That's probably because they belong to Bill K9HZ. There are boards that he designed that have become de facto standards for V12. I think - his PA, his LPF, his LPF control card, his BPF. Those cards are in a different area of his github. - Jerry, KF6VB |
Re: T41 BPF 6m confusion
Yeah that's probably wrong. See the instructions. It follows Olivers report.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Dr. William J. Schmidt - K9HZ J68HZ 8P6HK ZF2HZ PJ4/K9HZ VP5/K9HZ PJ2/K9HZ VP2EHZ Owner - Operator Big Signal Ranch ¨C K9ZC Staunton, Illinois Owner ¨C Operator Villa Grand Piton ¨C J68HZ Soufriere, St. Lucia W.I. Rent it: www.VillaGrandPiton.com Moderator: North American QRO Group at Groups.IO. Moderator: Amateur Radio Builders Group at Groups.IO. email: bill@... -----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Robert Luken W3RDL via groups.io Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2025 8:10 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [SoftwareControlledHamRadio] T41 BPF 6m confusion I started to wind the coils for the 6m band and am confused about L601, L603, and L605. The directions say L601 and L605 are 39nH, 5" 24AWG, 5 turns on a 1/8" drill bit. However, L603 is 24nH, 4" 24AWG, 7 turns on a 1/8" drill bit. How can 7 turns require less wire than 5 turns and how can 7 turns have less inductance than 5 turns? Bob W3RDL -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com |
Re: slow starting on T41 kit
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýNope¡ all are there¡ ? ? Dr. William J. Schmidt - K9HZ J68HZ 8P6HK ZF2HZ PJ4/K9HZ VP5/K9HZ PJ2/K9HZ VP2EHZ ? Owner - Operator Big Signal Ranch ¨C K9ZC Staunton, Illinois ? Owner ¨C Operator Villa Grand Piton ¨C J68HZ Soufriere, St. Lucia W.I. Rent it: ? Moderator: North American QRO Group at Groups.IO. Moderator: Amateur Radio Builders Group at Groups.IO. ? email:? bill@... ? ? From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Tim via groups.io
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2025 8:03 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [SoftwareControlledHamRadio] slow starting on T41 kit ? I can view and down load PDF's fine. I think some of the V12 Schematics in PDF format are missing from Git Hub though. Tim W4YN |
Re: slow starting on T41 kit
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýWhat files do you want?? I can send them to you directly via email. ? ? Dr. William J. Schmidt - K9HZ J68HZ 8P6HK ZF2HZ PJ4/K9HZ VP5/K9HZ PJ2/K9HZ VP2EHZ ? Owner - Operator Big Signal Ranch ¨C K9ZC Staunton, Illinois ? Owner ¨C Operator Villa Grand Piton ¨C J68HZ Soufriere, St. Lucia W.I. Rent it: ? Moderator: North American QRO Group at Groups.IO. Moderator: Amateur Radio Builders Group at Groups.IO. ? email:? bill@... ? ? From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Ron VE8RT
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2025 7:39 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [SoftwareControlledHamRadio] slow starting on T41 kit ? Over the last couple of days I've made attempts to view the .pdf files, both on my Ubuntu desktop and a Win& laptop at work.? The .pdf are not working, instead I have this message: Unable to render code block ? At this point I don't know what I can do to view the files. ? Ron |