开云体育

Hi Justin. Thank you for the information.? I'll move forward with the build. Duane - K5CA

Hi Steve: You're right...and in some cases, those interests change over time. I ran 500W from about 1972 to 1990's and then went to a "standard" 100W transceiver. When I retired in 2009, I discovered

The point missed here is that our hobby survives by bringing new people into the hobby and helping them to flourish in whatever avenue keeps them interested (building, operating, POTA, Digital Modes,

Hey Duane, The 0R resistors are correct. When I sent my boards to fabrication 3.3K resistors were in the schematic but this was changed shortly afterward. There was some discussion in this group that

Will do. Thanks. Duane - K5CA

All One of the great things about this hobby of amateur radio is that is has so many different aspects that interest just about anyone. I became interested in amateur radio twenty years ago. I ended

Like I said, you are a big contester and, while much more modest equipment, I enjoy contesting, too. I'm just not very good at it. I've participated in Field Day, the Sweepstakes, and several QRP

Completed RX and TX IQ cal all working fine. I went into menu to change display options, as soon as menu came up it returned went back to spectrum display which was only partial display. Now it

You are gonna have to ask Justin why he did that… Dr. William J. Schmidt - K9HZ J62K(J68HZ) 8P6HK ZF2HZ PJ4/K9HZ VP5/K9HZ PJ2/K9HZ VP2EHZ Owner - Operator Big Signal Ranch – K9ZC Staunton,

I started out contesting when I was 15… like all my friends and most of the contesters today. The first contest I ever entered was a novice round-up. and I only made about 25 contacts because the

Hi.? I purchased a set of boards from Justin, AI6YM.? I working on putting the RF module/board.? Looking at the schematic, it reads that R35 and R37 are supposed to be 3.3KΩ.? Looking at the

I've submitted scores to contests, too, and I can understand interest in where you placed. However, I think listing the top, say, 25, in each category would be enough. The complete listing could have

Certainly no more than the thousands of people that participate in them and submit their scores… Dr. William J. Schmidt - K9HZ J62K(J68HZ) 8P6HK ZF2HZ PJ4/K9HZ VP5/K9HZ PJ2/K9HZ VP2EHZ Owner -

When it came to contest scores, I think CQ was the worst offender.? I found it hard to believe more than a handful of people would care about all of the scores in all of the contests. Jack, W8TEE

I was never much impressed by QST. It always seemed to be mostly a gossip magazine. Lots of contest scores. I saved all my 73's and Ham Radio magazines from the 70's, but the QSTs got recycled. Really

Another good construction mag was one by Radio Club in Finland, I was member for a number of years, lots of qrp builds (I built all the Juma kits) however most were not in English, made it hard. Nice

Yes, "Sprat on a Stick" is a great bargain and I have that as well. I never got to meet Rev. Dobbs, as I came to QRP radio late in the scheme of things (2009). I bought an ARRL Life Membership in 1972

I have printed and CD's of Sprat publications. Really miss Reverend Dobbs! Met him a FDIM. QST articles are lame and have mistakes or incorrect data, supposed to be reviewed but stuff gets thru. QEX

Jack and Al Given that you're stepping back from the T41 software, can you clarify the last section of the copyright block: Thanks Terrance

Jack, I have subscribed to both the ARRL QST and RADCOM, and I suspect that if one tallied up the construction articles in the course of a year, the RadCOM would be definitely ahead with the shear