Well, I¡¯m sure this won¡¯t be appreciated either.
You could request access to see the information you say you¡¯re interested in. Or ask that the link be made public. Or sent?this privately.?
All of which, again,?would have provided you with the information about the game.?
There were options here that didn¡¯t involve you using one game and one?set of people to call out an issue that you claim to have with many different RPG¡¯s over the years.?
This was?rude and uncalled for, and I think the way you opened your response shows you know?that.?
On Sunday, May 21, 2023, 3:53 PM, Cy via groups.io <epyon_wing2002@...> wrote:
Hmm.
So, I'm not sure this will be appreciated, but, I don't really understand why you have a link to the wiki for the game when there is no information available. And it looks like less than an ideal way to sign up to even be able to look at said information. This isn't the first game I have seen do this, either. As someone that might have an interest in a game, and someone that has been active for 20 years, a link to nothing is quite off-putting. I'd like to actually be able to see information other than just the advert spiel. Take a look at character bios and what might be wanted/needed to make one myself. See if anyone I might want to use has already been claimed as the avatar/face/whatever term you like. See if you have specific information about locations that will be used in the game, rules, FAQ etc. Anything to get a feel for the game or the other people I might be joining. Having something available to see without the need to join has also in the past let me see when a game that seemed cool for a shiny advert actually wouldn't work for me because of time commitments or game play style which are also important.
Just some thoughts.
