Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
Search
Problem with measuring Q's of Caps & Inductors
Hello All,
I haven't posted in years but I need your help now. The hardware is a single detector board with Pauls original coupler board unmodified. The software I'm using is MyVNA version 1.0.0.54 on an XP machine. Problem. I think I'm having problem measuring the correct Q of good Caps and Inductors, I never seem to measure a Q greater than 200. Vacuum Cap or inductors wound on PVC forms. Why is that? Is this to be expected with the original coupler board? Should I be using the wider bandwidth RF-IV sensor PCB for measuring higher impedance parts? Thanks for your time, Dave - wb9own |
Dave,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
It might seem like heresy but I would recommend that you download the software that runs the DG8SAQ VNWA. /g/VNWA/files/A1%20DG8SAQ//VNWA36.7.9.8.zip It will also control the N2PK VNA and is extremely powerful.? Then investigate the amazing documents written by Kurt, OZ7OU.? One in particular: How to Measure the Resonant Frequency and Q of an Air Coil might be helpful.?? I don't know whether this will make it through but it's attached. Wes? N7WS On Wednesday, July 22, 2020, 9:44:10 AM MST, David Garnier <dsgarnier@...> wrote:
Hello All, I haven't posted in years but I need your help now. The hardware is a single detector board with Pauls original coupler board unmodified.? The software I'm using is MyVNA version 1.0.0.54 on an XP machine. Problem.? I think I'm having problem measuring the correct Q of good Caps and Inductors, I never seem to measure a Q greater than 200.? Vacuum Cap or inductors wound on PVC forms. Why is that?? Is this to be expected with the original coupler board?? Should I be using the wider bandwidth RF-IV sensor PCB for measuring higher impedance parts? Thanks for your time, Dave - wb9own |
Hi Gary,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Thank you for the reply jogging my memory! I vaguely remember long a thread and the construction of the RFIV head, I wish I would have paid more attention and built one. I will contact Ivan for PCB. I've gotten active on 630 meters and I'm trying to evaluate C's & L's hence the problem. This N2PK VNA keeps giving and giving, every project is a journey. I also need to thank Paul N2PK for this fine instrument and giving his time support over the years. This was done in the finest amateur radio traditions, what a great Elmer gift project this has been. 73's Dave - wb9own On Thursday, July 23, 2020, 02:45:57 PM CDT, kb4j_2000 via groups.io <kb4j_2000@...> wrote:
Some years back I was having trouble measuring Q.? The values from my HP 4342 and N2PK were no where near the same.? Contacted Paul and he suggested getting a rfiv bridge.? Things changed dramatically.? Now my readings are very realistic with both units. Hope this helps. Gary |
Ron Skelton
Greetings to all, In response, the Agilent Impedance Measurement Handbook illustrates where RF-IV is superior to the reflection method.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Measuring capacitor ESR is especially challenging and a study conducted by D. Stepins, at the university of Riga Latvia focused on capacitor parameter measurement accuracy using a VNA. It concluded transmission measurements were the most accurate and reflection methods should not be used. www.researchgate.net/publication/269166796... My N2PK VNA has been used to make many reflection and transmission measurements of capacitor ESR . The reflection method sometimes produced absurd results. Agilent illustrates this to explain why some ESR values were negative. It seems to me that measuring very low values in the presence of much larger values comes down to the dynamic range of the instrument ESR is a case in point Good health,wealth and happiness to all in the N2PK community Ron W6WO On 2020-07-23 21:50, David Garnier wrote:
Hi Gary, |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss