Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- N2PK-VNA
- Messages
Search
Re: N2PK Website
Many thanks, Dave, but the N2PK VNA would have suffered an early demise had
it not been your and Ivan's efforts with respect to adding the USB interface! The same goes for your, Tom's, Greg's, Ian's, and Roger's SW efforts. Re ZIPs, I now have four ZIP files of my website. But the largest is c. 28 MB and presumably too big for emailing. They are present now in the website files but I do not know how to point anyone to them. Can you do so? HNY, Paul N2PK On Wed, Jan 1, 2020 at 5:57 PM Dave Roberts <dave.roberts@...> wrote: Hi Paul |
Re: N2PK Website
Many thanks, Paul, for you contribution to the community.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I'll be "pumping" your website for my personal archives and will try to find a host during the following weeks. If I succeed, I'll send a notice to the community. After the disappearance of Sam Wetterlin's web site, the temporary troubles of Scotty Sprowl's MSA pages (now solved), it would be a shame if your work could disappear. The first time I register on this mailing list, many years from now, I was a complete nOOb and definitely unable to make the difference between a VNA and a SA. Your analyzer and your many patient explanations on this mailing list gave me the opportunity to learn a lot Tnks again Marc f6itu -----Message d'origine-----
De?: [email protected] <[email protected]> De la part de Paul Kiciak via Groups.Io Envoy¨¦?: mercredi 1 janvier 2020 18:06 ??: [email protected]; N2PK-VNA <N2PK-VNA@...> Cc?: Makarov, Ivan <miv@...>; Roberts, Dave <dave.roberts@...>; bill@...; Tom, DG8SAQ <baier@...>; Ordy, Greg <ordy@...> Objet?: [N2PK-VNA] N2PK Website Hi All, With the start of the new year, I am seriously considering discontinuing the N2PK.COM website. Assuming I proceed with this, it will likely happen shortly after Feb. 1, 2020. The website will be gone and this will be my only email address. As I believe I have mentioned before, anyone wanting to save all of the N2PK.COM content and then re-display it somewhere else can do so with my agreement as long as that content is credited with me being its author. I would appreciate anyone doing this to notify us all on one and preferably both of these groups. Many thanks to the MANY people who have supported and improved the N2PK VNA over the years, in particular: Ivan (VE3IVM), Dave (G8KBB), Bill (W7AAZ), Harold (W4ZCB - now SK), Tom (DG8SAQ), Greg (W8WWV), Ian (GM3SEK), and Roger (GM4PMK). I suspect there are others that I am not recalling and to those I apologize. It's been a WONDERFUL experience for me! Happy New Year, Paul N2PK |
N2PK Website
Hi All,
With the start of the new year, I am seriously considering discontinuing the N2PK.COM website. Assuming I proceed with this, it will likely happen shortly after Feb. 1, 2020. The website will be gone and this will be my only email address. As I believe I have mentioned before, anyone wanting to save all of the N2PK.COM content and then re-display it somewhere else can do so with my agreement as long as that content is credited with me being its author. I would appreciate anyone doing this to notify us all on one and preferably both of these groups. Many thanks to the MANY people who have supported and improved the N2PK VNA over the years, in particular: Ivan (VE3IVM), Dave (G8KBB), Bill (W7AAZ), Harold (W4ZCB - now SK), Tom (DG8SAQ), Greg (W8WWV), Ian (GM3SEK), and Roger (GM4PMK). I suspect there are others that I am not recalling and to those I apologize. It's been a WONDERFUL experience for me! Happy New Year, Paul N2PK |
N2PK project items
Greetings I have been a keen user virtually from the beginning. Recently a very good friend passed away and prior to leaving us he donated the VNA Items which he built or purchased, He was an expert builder and his superior workmanship is clear. Unfortunately he died before final assembly and testing. Here are the items that I am offering for sale as a complete set.
The case is typically used in N2PK VNA projects .The front panel has the 3 SMA connectors with a USB rear connector Main board rev 5.1 came from Ivan VE3IVM Semiflex cables with SMA connectors are used throughout HF reflection bridge has SMA sockets to match those on the front panel with male-male couplers VE3IVM RF-IV rev 2 board (not built) Two low noise power supplies with over-voltage and crow-bar protection were designed specifically for the N2PK VNA and made by OM3LZ, One is dual 12 and 5V version 4 is the other supplies 12, 9 and 5 v for use with transverters.I recommend studying the OM3LZ project description on his web site I will be pleased to respond to email questions and will provide pictures of all items to those interested As a sanity check I am expecting offers over $300 |
Re: How to see the old messages
I recommend download "messages.zip" from files section folder.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Then uncompress. Then open messages-8-20-2014-thru-10-22-2019.txt (with "notepad.exe" or other simple text editor. One line per message. Example: 26|25|2004-09-07 22:10:24|Paul Kiciak|Re: Reflection bridge|Hi Davide, > A question, did anybody measure the directivity of the reflection > bridge described at page 21. > Thanks > 73's > iw3hev, Davide The measured directivity on my T1-6T bridge exceeds 53 dB for 0.05 - 10 MHz. Above 10 MHz, it drops at about 12 dB/octave and is 20 dB at 60 MHz. Also for reference, the measured (Short-Open) ratio in dB on my T1-6T bridge is about +0.7 dB / -0.0 dB for 0.05 - 60 MHz and about +0.3 dB / -0.0 dB for 0.1 - 30 MHz. Here is an easy way to measure bridge directivity: --- 1. Pick the desired freq sweep in TRANS. 2. Use the bridge with an OPEN on the DUT port for the cal THRU. 3. Open the Detector as usual for that cal step. 4. Put the bridge back on with 50 Ohms on the DUT port and measure it as the DUT. 5. Directivity will be essentially the negative of the measured gain, so just plot/view that. --- This test doesn't measure purely bridge directivity since it also includes the effects of source and load match in the VNA RF DDS and Detector RF Input. If desired, these effects can be reduced by inserting some attenuation (pads), say 10 dB, at the RF DDS Output and Detector RF Input. Generally, the addition of these pads would change the measured results by less than 1 dB, I expect. Obviously directivity will also depend on the quality of the 50 ohm load standard used in Step #4. The (Short-Open) ratio can be measured using the same procedure, but use the Short calibration standard in Step #4 in place of the 50 Ohm load standard. My tests were performed with the two 8 pF capacitors called for on Fig. 11 of Part 2. Other measured results with the same nominal capacitors will likely be different depending on component tolerances. Most of this is of little consequence when the bridge is used with the VNA software since the OSL calibration accounts for these and other (linear) errors The main utility of good bridge directivity is if the bridge is used in other non-VNA apllications. -- 73, Paul N2PK Now, you can convert each symbol | to new-line, like this: 26 25 2004-09-07 22:10:24 Paul Kiciak Re: Reflection bridge Hi Davide, > A question, did anybody measure the directivity of the reflection > bridge described at page 21. > Thanks > 73's > iw3hev, Davide The measured directivity on my T1-6T bridge exceeds 53 dB for 0.05 - 10 MHz. Above 10 MHz, it drops at about 12 dB/octave and is 20 dB at 60 MHz. Also for reference, the measured (Short-Open) ratio in dB on my T1-6T bridge is about +0.7 dB / -0.0 dB for 0.05 - 60 MHz and about +0.3 dB / -0.0 dB for 0.1 - 30 MHz. Here is an easy way to measure bridge directivity: --- 1. Pick the desired freq sweep in TRANS. 2. Use the bridge with an OPEN on the DUT port for the cal THRU. 3. Open the Detector as usual for that cal step. 4. Put the bridge back on with 50 Ohms on the DUT port and measure it as the DUT. 5. Directivity will be essentially the negative of the measured gain, so just plot/view that. --- This test doesn't measure purely bridge directivity since it also includes the effects of source and load match in the VNA RF DDS and Detector RF Input. If desired, these effects can be reduced by inserting some attenuation (pads), say 10 dB, at the RF DDS Output and Detector RF Input. Generally, the addition of these pads would change the measured results by less than 1 dB, I expect. Obviously directivity will also depend on the quality of the 50 ohm load standard used in Step #4. The (Short-Open) ratio can be measured using the same procedure, but use the Short calibration standard in Step #4 in place of the 50 Ohm load standard. My tests were performed with the two 8 pF capacitors called for on Fig. 11 of Part 2. Other measured results with the same nominal capacitors will likely be different depending on component tolerances. Most of this is of little consequence when the bridge is used with the VNA software since the OSL calibration accounts for these and other (linear) errors The main utility of good bridge directivity is if the bridge is used in other non-VNA apllications. -- 73, Paul N2PK On Wednesday, October 30, 2019, 12:52:05 AM MDT, canale via Groups.Io <gf.canale@...> wrote:
Hi I have seen in the files of the new group the messages. I have tried to see the content but i see only a lot of figures, words non sense. Can anybody explain to me how to visualize correctly the messages of the old group ? Thanks Gianfranco |
181 - 187 of 187
to navigate to use esc to dismiss