开云体育

Steve: Yes, this is an issue that I'd like to put to rest, unfortunately, its much more difficult than most would think, unless I do a redraw all the time. For example, you load a job, so the G-Code

A *VERY* useful feature in a sheet of nested parts This can be a CAM function... Olivier.

Robin, sorry for my bad english, you didn't understood all what i mean. 3D mapping is not a CAM feature. It is for compensating geometric distorsion of the physical axis (bending, perpendicularity,

Steve: I can easily change belt ratios and get smooth spindle speeds at 100rpm with the motor doing 1000rpm. I don't think you will. All the tests youve been running for us over the last several

Hi Olivier: I'll look into this, it puills upo the debugger on mine, but it mnay be a different config of my system or soemthing... Art www.artofcnc.ca

HI Brian: Very strange. No, I did nothing to the A only moves, the change I did should have applied only to mixed moves including an angular component....I have removed these changes and will

Hi Bengt: No, that kind of computer looks like it should track any future changes well. Thanks, Art www.artofcnc.ca

thats neat, I like that. I'll settle for 'the display not being all wrong while cutting if you do a G92 after loading the part' though ;) probably not so useful. In reallity, all positioning will be

this IMHO is a CAM feature not a controller feature yep, they are going to be handy not sure what you mean ... it works with geckos just fine ? almost certainly CAM features. writing machining

no you don;t :) you can just put a 3.0mm dia tool in the tool table, select that tool and then put G41 or whatever in your GCODE file and it will offset and apply cutter radius compensation on the

I'm right with you Steve. The toolpath display don't need a high priority on "the list". Just a bug correction for the moment. According to me there are others things to do before, like 3D mapping,

Which versions of your software, have the capacity to figuring tooling offset, or... bit diameter? I already have Mach2, but I've been using Vector Engineering's .free quick tools, and I have to

Save your dollars. Why not download Dolphin (http://www.dolphin.gb.com/) and use their CAD package, as its free. They have a CAM module as an add-on that you pay for when you are ready. There is a

Steve, Pardon me for jumping into this discussion between you and Art. I don't know anything about Art's code but my experience with large mills is that about 10 PPR for a spindle speed sensor will

point is Hello Art, get brown a little, get drunk a little and get rid off flu and have a splended break in the sun. For intelligent toolpath how about seeing the millpad from the tool along the

minimum and XP Hi Art, Looking at future, is there any *real* issues using a 2G Celeron CPU, 256Mb and std graphics. Will it be *outdated* in near future as regards speed? I hope you will get a good

Scout You can download Dolphin CAD for Free, at the moment this is available from our Website, www.dolphin.gb.com <http://www.dolphin.gb.com/> . This will provide you with a 1st rate drawing module

I am fairly happy with the performance of the motors I have the only major change I want to make is to my Z axis which tends to miss steps due to the poor performance of the quasi linear bearing

Chis and Mike, The problem is that the Mastercam post that I uploaded was actually written back in the V5 era. The MPFAN.PST will output the clearance plane but there will be some recoding required in

I have the exact same problem. I end up importing into mach 2 and editing to add a g0 z move at the start of the code. I hate having to rework code that is otherwise perfect. Mike Hammel