开云体育

I have now added switches so I can HOME and SQUARE the X axis. I have a question about how this should work. Here is what I get when I hit "REF ALL HOME" The X axis moves in the - direction (AS

Yeah. T5 is the same / functionally similar stuff. Woah..Namibia used to live (grew up in) africa. -- -hanermo (cnc designs)

Been looking at the HTD pulleys – is the same I have My drive system is using 60T T5 Timing pulley for driving and the 15T T5 Timing pulley connected to my 15T pinion gear. The belt is T5 420 Timing

Who supply the HTD pulleys? Will for sure source them – the better my system works the better I am. I noted another issue- when doing a test in the air with this code, I noticed the spindle does not

Great ! So, with the lower acceleration, the error does not appear, yes ? Now, to confirm, put it back up to 100 again, and see if it now appears. If it does, with high confidence, you have

I did the tests a few times and the z-axis comes back to the correct zero position. This is after I have reduced the acceleration. Sent: 17 February 2015 02:41 PM To: mach1mach2cnc@...

Well let me explain what I do. Remember my machine is using a manual tool change, so every time I execute M6, it will go to the tool change position, I insert the new tool. Then I press OK. The cnc

I assume you mean Parallel Port? _ Yes I am. Sent: 17 February 2015 09:15 PM To: mach1mach2cnc@... Subject: Re: [mach1mach2cnc] Support This is, by far, the best method. The most important

Adam wrote: """ What is the steps per inch in Mach3? If your less then 10k you could be at the limit of one step. """ yep, that's probably it... belt drive only requires 2224 steps per inch... I'm

I can buy (and live with) a rounding error. I'm not about to start diddling the screen at this point, I'm still a babe-in-the-woods with most of this stuff, so if it ain't broke bad enough to actually

What is the steps per inch in Mach3? If your less then 10k you could be at the limit of one step. In MachScreen ( http://www.kd-dietz.com/klausphp/pages/eng/machscreen/description/ms_description.html)

Could maybe be roundoff. Its small enough. What the DROs state is not exact .. they are a truncation (? or rounded ) from the internal representation, that was something very accurate. 32 digits maybe

This is, by far, the best method. The most important thing in troubleshooting is to only change one thing at a time. And, if you think you have discovered simething important, go back and verify it

Here's one for you.... the following script is called with the "Auto Zero Tool" button: """ CurrentFeed = GetOemDRO(818) 'Get the current feedrate to return to later CurrentAbsInc = GetOemLED(48) 'Get

I didn't know you could do that. I've learnt something. If you change tool number (length dia etc) wouldn't you have to change the rest of the code or you'll be cutting over or under size. I confess,

I am editing the code in Mach Sent: 17 February 2015 08:31 PM To: mach1mach2cnc@... Subject: Re: [mach1mach2cnc] Support When you say 'manually change the code to use tool 2' What are you

When you say 'manually change the code to use tool 2' What are you actually doing? Are you re-writing the code in your CAM software or changing a Mach DRO? or...?

I will run the few tests tomorrow morning and then give feedback As I mentioned, I use the Calipso MachStdMill screenset and on the tooling page you can zero the axes from a button. What I do is: I

Andre, Your statement that you changed Z heights to above the work and ran the code with no problems and always have problems with the next tool when cutting makes the scenario Art was describing fit.

Hi Yes. This way the zero position is always a fixed position and is just easier for me. I found that sometimes when zeroing on top of the material, the board tends to bend on the corners sometimes,