Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- MachCNC
- Messages
Search
Re: Version 5.0
Art
Steve:
Yes, this is an issue that I'd like to put to rest, unfortunately, itsLets take into account tool offsets! much more difficult than most would think, unless I do a redraw all the time. For example, you load a job, so the G-Code is translated to create a toolpath. It has no choice but to use current offsets and locations as the drawing parameters. This means if you change a tool, zero to a new position, basically change anything, then the drawing is no longer accurate. A regen is required. But you can imagine the problem if I do a redraw everytime some one changes something. A 500,000 line drawing can take 2 seconds to redraw on the slower machines, this means a 2 second redraw occuring possibly in the worst possible moment and affecting the cut. Luckily, this has affected some users more than others. Typically, the more experienced ones with the more complex programs. The reason I'm looking at redoing it all is that exact reason, in order to eliminate the kludges which have created the trouble. (Actually, mill works much better than turn does in terms of drawing, lately I have only fixed the mill drawing , as I know turn will be the biggest challenge...) That why this particular fix has one of the highest priorities... Art www.artofcnc.ca |
Re: Version 5.0
Robin, sorry for my bad english, you didn't understood all what i mean.
3D mapping is not a CAM feature. It is for compensating geometric distorsion of the physical axis (bending, perpendicularity, linear lenght distorsion). It is implemented on most or perhaps all professional controlers, but it could be even more usefull on hobbist machines because their geometry is not always perfect, and sometimes bad, specially for the Z axis perpendicularity. There is no need for lasers and high tech machines to create these 3D compensation tables. just a good precision square and a caliper.For linear compensation we could use a linear glass encoder with a mach2 macro to create the table. Gecko mode is for the gecko 2002. Sometimes there is no need to go through a CAM program for simple parts. G70, 71, 72 if i remeber are simple turn cycles for roughing - finishing. There is too the G96 constant surface speed to implement in mach2. Encoder feedback pointless ? : all professional machines have encoder feedback, sometimes with a double feedback, even if they use steppers. If there is a cutting problem on the machine, for example a breaked insert, or a raimaining error in the program, the load will be so high on the motors you will lost step most of the time. If there is no feedback you can : - destroy the part - destroy the tool - destroy all things sitting on the machine table like fixture - destroy the spindle and / or bend the machine frame - destroy the operator Mach2 give the possibility to use servo feedback with external gecko 302 drivers for example, that's fine. But there is actually no possibility to use a linear encoder feedback system for a better precision / control. Advanced digitizing : for example to digitize non rectangular parts. Did you try to digitize a circular part ? the rectangular moves will wast a lot of time. Best regards, Olivier. |
Re: Spindle sensors
Art
Steve:
I can easily change belt ratios and get smooth spindle speeds atAm I going to get any advantage fitting this multi slot sensor? 100rpm with the motor doing 1000rpm. I don't think you will. All the tests youve been running for us over the last several months gives me a fairly good view of your lathes stability and its actually quite a stable beast. Single slot is probably good enough on your system, but Multi slot might give a slight improvement when taking deep cuts. (Course, you wouldn't do that....) Art www.artofcnc.ca |
Re: Version 5.0
Art
HI Brian:
Very strange. No, I did nothing to the A only moves, the change I did should have applied only to mixed moves including an angular component....I have removed these changes and will investigate furhter when I return.. Something very queer going on here... I'll have to try something else when I get back... Thanks for the testing Brian, we'll get there eventualy... Thanks, Art |
Re: Version 5.0
Robin Szemeti
On Friday 05 March 2004 22:50, Art wrote:
thats neat, I like that. I'll settle for 'the display not being all wrong while cutting if you do a G92 after loading the part' though ;) I intend toprobably not so useful. In reallity, all positioning will be done with reference to the real materials, which are likely not the same size as the bed ... positioning the cutter/torch is usually to the effective 0,0 of the sheet .. I can see being able to position it top bottom, left, right on a sheet being useful, but arbitary positioning is likely to be to use part-sheets, and that will need reference to the actual material. The X,Y, Z gantry will move during the cut showing thehmmm ... not so certain thats actually useful. It sounds fun to do from a programming point of view ( a 3d modle of the machine etc), but Im not sure its useful. A few buttons will be included to select overall view (as just described), zoom to part view, zoom to tool view (Showing a small This would allow for capabilities at some pointnow That WOULD be useful .. one thing I continually get asked for is 'how can I continue this cut from where the plasma went off' .. like it did the other day as a customers compressor was not up to the job ,, you're stuffed at the moment. no way to do a run from here as that system seems pretty much Mill specific and the 'start spindle' functionality is not ideal. What really needs to be doen is either some 'click on the toolpath' and then hit go, and Mach2 figures out whether the plasma should be on or off at that point. better yet would be a back-up, to reverse along the toolpath, but thats not so easy I suspect. A *VERY* useful feature in a sheet of nested parts (and htis would apply to routers as well as plasma) would be to be able to click on a part on the table and have mach 2 run the code from the start of that part. perhaps specifying somewhere a regex that matches the comment line that appears at the beginning of each part block. Waht some BIG machines do is use a subroutine for each part, the main program jsut calling subs, thats a lot easier to sort out then. -- RapidCut CNC Technology CNC Plasma Cutter |
Re: Version 5.0
Robin Szemeti
On Saturday 06 March 2004 10:25, Digital audio Pro wrote:
I'm right with you Steve. The toolpath display don't need a high priority 3D mapping,this IMHO is a CAM feature not a controller feature conversational screens,yep, they are going to be handy gecko mode,not sure what you mean ... it works with geckos just fine turn roughing - finishing cycles,? almost certainly CAM features. writing machining strategies into your controller is a very Bad Plan (tm) usually, as one persons idea of the correct strategy is rarely what someone else wants. encoder feedback on geckoumm tricky. and probably pointless. If you have missed a step then htere are two reasons: mechanical (too much torque required) .. well there is nothing you can do, the motor failed to move because forces where too high, then throwing more pulses at it is not going to help is it? electrical (noise, bad signal) ... well if the motor failed to step because the signal was messed up, how do you know it wasn't the *encoder* signal that was messed up? .. sort the wiring out and hte problem goes away. mode, advanced digitizing...advanced? in what way? ... -- RapidCut CNC Technology CNC Plasma Cutter |
Re: (First drawing software (was cnc plasma)
Robin Szemeti
On Saturday 06 March 2004 10:13, Jeremy Taylor wrote:
Which versions of your software, have the capacity to figuring toolingno you don;t :) you can just put a 3.0mm dia tool in the tool table, select that tool and then put G41 or whatever in your GCODE file and it will offset and apply cutter radius compensation on the fly. I'm looking for something that can automatically do thisFor automtaically doing it, Dolphin CAM is probably the most cost effective option. For 3 axis stuff it simple to use compared to some of the more bells&whistles packages likr VisualMill, but .. its all there. Hunt around for the Mach2 special offer on Dolphin which brings it down to a very good price. -- RapidCut CNC Technology CNC Plasma Cutter |
Re: Version 5.0
I'm right with you Steve. The toolpath display don't need a high priority on
"the list". Just a bug correction for the moment. According to me there are others things to do before, like 3D mapping, conversational screens, gecko mode, turn roughing - finishing cycles, encoder feedback on gecko mode, advanced digitizing... Olivier. |
Re: (First drawing software (was cnc plasma)
Jeremy Taylor
Which versions of your software, have the capacity to figuring tooling
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
offset, or... bit diameter? I already have Mach2, but I've been using Vector Engineering's .free quick tools, and I have to "hand" offset my drawings by 3mm (diameter of bit) to keep them true. I'm looking for something that can automatically do this for as little $$ as possible. Jeremy Taylor ----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Milligan" <zen11777@...> To: <mach1mach2cnc@...> Sent: Saturday, March 06, 2004 2:30 AM Subject: RE: [mach1mach2cnc] (First drawing software (was cnc plasma) Scout |
Re: (First drawing software (was cnc plasma)
Robin Szemeti
On Friday 05 March 2004 22:24, dk32544 wrote:
Well, thanks for all the great info. Looks like what I need to do is justSave your dollars. Why not download Dolphin () and use their CAD package, as its free. They have a CAM module as an add-on that you pay for when you are ready. There is a special price for Dolphin when used with Mach2 to keep it in the right ball-park and its a pretty good deal for 3 axis machining. I have some 'issues' with the CAM module for plasma though, so I'm waiting to see if the next release with its scripting and customisation features addresses those. Whatever, the CAD software makes a pretty good drawing package and the DXF exports are fine, you can use the DXF import facility of Mach2 to generate toopaths striaght from the DXF exports of Dolphin, OK, so you dont get kerf compensation or choice of lead-in, but if you are just hacking out brackets to be welded up into parts, it may well be all you need. -- RapidCut CNC Technology CNC Plasma Cutter |
Re: Spindle sensors
bull2002winkle
Steve,
Pardon me for jumping into this discussion between you and Art. I don't know anything about Art's code but my experience with large mills is that about 10 PPR for a spindle speed sensor will give the controller a much better idea of what the machine is doing. As I understand his algorithm he is not trying to control spindle speed but rather to measure it and it's absolute position so as to make the carriage motion correct for the thread in question. A 10 PPR spindle pulse with an index pulse for each revolution would seem to be ideal for this operation. The software can then make a very accurate determination of actual spindle speed and the index pulse will tell where it is relative to the cartridge. The best of both worlds. If you look at this from 20,000 feet (or meters for Art) it's a classic type 1 open loop servo. Feedback from the spindle sensor controlling the carriage motion to produce a desired result but no way of knowing if it did. I these cases the best one can do is get the most accurate feedback from the rotation sensor and hope the other axis did what is was told to do. This is a very reasonable assumption with modern stepper or servo controls. Regards; Ken |
Re: Version 5.0
--- In mach1mach2cnc@..., Art <fenerty@a...> wrote:
Hi All: 1) How intelligent should the toolpath be. What I intend at thispoint is Anyway, I will be around tommorrow, then I'm burnt...I mean gone...Hello Art, get brown a little, get drunk a little and get rid off flu and have a splended break in the sun. For intelligent toolpath how about seeing the millpad from the tool along the toolpad and let the pad by visual all the time. Thanks and regards Cees |
Re: What is minimum CPU?
bsjoelund
--- In mach1mach2cnc@..., Art <fenerty@a...> wrote:
Hi Bengt:minimum and XP or Win2000Hi Art, Looking at future, is there any *real* issues using a 2G Celeron CPU, 256Mb and std graphics. Will it be *outdated* in near future as regards speed? I hope you will get a good relax in CanCun, *salt* *te***a* *lemon* :) Regards from a cold Stockholm Bengt |
Re: (First drawing software (was cnc plasma)
Michael Milligan
Scout
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
You can download Dolphin CAD for Free, at the moment this is available from our Website, www.dolphin.gb.com <> . This will provide you with a 1st rate drawing module which supports DXF export. Regards Michael Dolphin Cad Cam Systems Ltd -----Original Message-----
From: Hugh Smith [mailto:smithh@...] Sent: 06 March 2004 01:48 To: mach1mach2cnc@... Subject: Re: [mach1mach2cnc] (First drawing software (was cnc plasma) Scout, I just purchased QuickCad 8 from for USD48.00 + the normal S&H&T. I use AutoCAD a lot and for 2D work QuickCad is easier. QuickCad does not do 3D and exports a dxf if wanted. Its been able to do everything I've asked of it, and for $48.00 whats to lose. Hugh ----- Original Message ----- From: dk32544 To: mach1mach2cnc@... Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 2:24 PM Subject: [mach1mach2cnc] (First drawing software (was cnc plasma) Well, thanks for all the great info. Looks like what I need to do is just get some drawing software and start practicing. Which leads me to my next question. For the near term future I'll be doing simple shapes - brackets and such. I guess most 2D shapes are simple, but I won't be doing much metal art until probably next year. So what software should I buy to start out with: Corel Draw, Quickdraw, or something else? I have heard of some problems with Corel Draw for this type of work, but don't remember what the issue was. P.S. I already have the ruler but I'm not sure if it's Windows XP compatible. lol. Scout ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------ Yahoo! Groups Links a.. To visit your group on the web, go to: b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: mach1mach2cnc-unsubscribe@... c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. _____ Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: mach1mach2cnc-unsubscribe@... <mailto:mach1mach2cnc-unsubscribe@...?subject=Unsubscribe> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of <> Service. |
Re: ShopBot conversion.
I am fairly happy with the performance of the motors I have the only
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
major change I want to make is to my Z axis which tends to miss steps due to the poor performance of the quasi linear bearing system employed by Shopbot on this particualar machine. I already have a set of bearing rods & a frame to replace the current axis (screen door roller, pipe, & unistrut). I will be using the ballscrew & related componenst of the stock Z. I have put a lot of miles on the motors that came with the machine, and for what Im' doing I have no complaints. So I guess the main thing is to figure out what point in the controller box gets the step & direction and elimanate the...Uh I donno I guess you would call it the interpereter? Gavin Your theory is correct. Ted Hall explained to me that there is a point on the controller board that can be used to attach to step and direction software. Not being technical myself, I can't remember where that point is. Nor can I remember if he said I can use the original drivers or would have to replace the drivers. The original ShopBot drivers are 1/4 step and induce considerable low speed resonance. In addition to the much more efficient Mach2 interface, you should get better overall performance with 10 microstep drivers like Gecko 201. The cost to replace the control box with Gecko 201s and Mach2 should be not more than USD $850.00. The real time tool path display and the ability to start a program from any line are worth the price of Mach2 on their own. Steve |
OT / Mastercam question
Servo Wizard
Chis and Mike,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
The problem is that the Mastercam post that I uploaded was actually written back in the V5 era. The MPFAN.PST will output the clearance plane but there will be some recoding required in order to use it. Servo Mike Hammel <mycamel@...> wrote: I have the exact same problem. I end up importing into mach 2 and editing to add a g0 z move at the start of the code. I hate having to rework code that is otherwise perfect. Mike Hammel www.fancyfoam.com 1704 Bullard Arkansas City, KS 67005 ----- Original Message -----
From: Ed To: mach1mach2cnc@... Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 10:08 PM Subject: [mach1mach2cnc] Re: Mastercam question > I am creating a toolpath in Mastercam and have the clearance value on my > Contour set at 2". > However, when I post the output (using the Mach2 post processer as well as > others) it starts at Z=0 and goes straight to the XY position of the start > of the contour before going to Z of 2". > > Does anybody have any ideas to what I'm doing wrong? > > Thanks, > -Chris Chris, I have used Master Cam some, but I haven't used the Clearance value at all. I use the Retract value of 0.25, Feed Plane of 0.1 Absolute, Top of stock 0.0 and Depth of cut -0.something. I have a guy at work that is an expert......I'll ask him your question. Ed ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links a.. To visit your group on the web, go to: b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: mach1mach2cnc-unsubscribe@... c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT Click Here --------------------------------- Yahoo! Groups Links To visit your group on the web, go to: To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: mach1mach2cnc-unsubscribe@... Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search - Find what youre looking for faster. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Re: Mastercam question
Mike Hammel
I have the exact same problem. I end up importing into mach 2 and editing to add a g0 z move at the start of the code. I hate having to rework code that is otherwise perfect.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Mike Hammel www.fancyfoam.com 1704 Bullard Arkansas City, KS 67005 ----- Original Message -----
From: Ed To: mach1mach2cnc@... Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 10:08 PM Subject: [mach1mach2cnc] Re: Mastercam question > I am creating a toolpath in Mastercam and have the clearance value on my > Contour set at 2". > However, when I post the output (using the Mach2 post processer as well as > others) it starts at Z=0 and goes straight to the XY position of the start > of the contour before going to Z of 2". > > Does anybody have any ideas to what I'm doing wrong? > > Thanks, > -Chris Chris, I have used Master Cam some, but I haven't used the Clearance value at all. I use the Retract value of 0.25, Feed Plane of 0.1 Absolute, Top of stock 0.0 and Depth of cut -0.something. I have a guy at work that is an expert......I'll ask him your question. Ed ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links a.. To visit your group on the web, go to: b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: mach1mach2cnc-unsubscribe@... c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss