开云体育

A three Phase question please


 

The question is is the lopsided waveform between ~A and ground an accurate representation of a winding connected across a?

across any two of the phases?

?

I was under the impression that the output was supposed to be symmetrical. That said it just an assumption, As I have not?dared put an oscilloscope on to the three phase to check. Or for that matter had access to the three phase either.


The file is in Files > TEMP >?3 Phase question > 3 phase query.asc


Any enlightenment and or help will be gratefully received. Thank you


Suusi M-B


 

开云体育

What do you mean "lopsided waveform"?
The traces I see are perfectly correct.
Indeed you can't take what happens at time-zero for granted, it could never happen in real life. Nature hates discontinuity.

Le 19/12/2013 19:05, smalcolmbrown@... a écrit?:

?

The question is is the lopsided waveform between ~A and ground an accurate representation of a winding connected across a?

across any two of the phases?

?

I was under the impression that the output was supposed to be symmetrical. That said it just an assumption, As I have not?dared put an oscilloscope on to the three phase to check. Or for that matter had access to the three phase either.


The file is in Files > TEMP >?3 Phase question > 3 phase query.asc


Any enlightenment and or help will be gratefully received. Thank you


Suusi M-B



 

Suusi,


What is happening is the voltage across the primary is not 0 at time=0, so you have a huge primary current at time=0.? Due to the long time constant it takes a long time for the primary imbalance to settle out.? You can avoid this problem by specifying UIC is the transient command.? Check Skip Initial operating point solution in the .tran window.


Rick


John Woodgate
 

In message <l8vch8+10ue8vj@...>, dated Thu, 19 Dec 2013,
smalcolmbrown@... writes:

The question is is the lopsided waveform between ~A and ground an
accurate representation of a winding connected across a?

across any two of the phases?
There should not be a 'lop-sided' waveform anywhere. Whatever you do
with adding and subtracting sine-waves of the same frequency but
whatever phase, the result is another sine wave or zero.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
Nondum ex silvis sumus
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK


 

Thank you sawreyrw


That really solved that one. I am glad that it is a simple fix :)



Thank you John?


For confirming what I thought was correct. :)


Thank you?Jerry Lee Marcel


For also confirming another rule of life :)

Suusi M-B


John Woodgate
 

In message <l8vjeg+tmtpa2@...>, dated Thu, 19 Dec 2013,
smalcolmbrown@... writes:


Thank you John?
I didn't realise that by 'lopsided' you meant that the waveform appeared
to have a large DC component.

There is still something not too good; your transformer inductance is
very low. Look at the primary current; 500 mA with no load. An
inductance of 10 H would be reasonable. Also note that the current is
'lop-sided' even with UIC. You actually have only a 2-phase system (V3
does nothing), with a non-optimum angle between the phases.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
Nondum ex silvis sumus
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK


 

John,


That current is correct.? It is due to the start up transient and the DC component will eventually go to 0.? Whether the magnetizing inductance is too low depends on the VA rating of the transformer.


Rick


John Woodgate
 

In message <l8vmqj+1p9b1hj@...>, dated Thu, 19 Dec 2013,
sawreyrw@... writes:

That current is correct.? It is due to the start up transient and the
DC component will eventually go to 0.?
I mean the 500 mA, not the 400 A in the original simulation. And the 'DC
component' doesn't go away entirely. The main transient is over by 1.4
s, but the positive peaks are 280 mA and the negative peaks are 240 mA
even up to 10 s.

Whether the magnetizing inductance is too low depends on the VA rating
of the transformer.
500 mA with no load is too much anyway, I think, even if the full load
current is 50 A. Also, the primary r.m.s. voltage is 56.6 V, not 62.3 V.

Still, never mind, eh?
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
Nondum ex silvis sumus
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK


 

Thank you John

The three phase is 36Vac 500Hz which really chucks a spanner in the transformer design. Doubly so as I have no component values to go on from the schematics and the descriptive text is in German. I'm just having some fun guestimating values and seeing what happens. with the values i used and a SCR instead of a thyratron.

The example circuit was the minimum needed to demonstrate the problem.


 

开云体育


Le 19/12/2013 23:02, John Woodgate a écrit?:
?

In message , dated Thu, 19 Dec 2013,
sawreyrw@... writes:


>Whether the magnetizing inductance is too low depends on the VA rating
>of the transformer.

500 mA with no load is too much anyway, I think,

In the absence of VA rating, it is presomptuous to venture a judgement whether the magnetizing current is too high or too small.

even if the full load current is 50 A.

Making the magnetizing current only 1/100th of the load current is a respectable performance

Also, the primary r.m.s. voltage is 56.6 V, not 62.3 V.

48.(1.732)/1.414=58.8


Still, never mind, eh?

With so many errors and uncertainties in the proposed circuit, it is difficult to have a sound judgement.

--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See
Nondum ex silvis sumus
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK



 

开云体育


Le 20/12/2013 00:02, smalcolmbrown@... a écrit?:
?

Thank you John

The three phase is 36Vac 500Hz

Then you have got the voltage wrong. 36V ac translates as 50.9V amplitude.

which really chucks a spanner in the transformer design.

Does it?

Doubly so as I have no component values to go on from the schematics and the descriptive text is in German. I'm just having some fun guestimating values and seeing what happens. with the values i used and a SCR instead of a thyratron.

The example circuit was the minimum needed to demonstrate the problem.

Modify the simulate statement for .tran 0 100 99.98
You will see that all the problems you see in the first seconds, due to the initial current surge have disappeared.


John Woodgate
 

In message <l8vtuh+10srk7j@...>, dated Thu, 19 Dec 2013, smalcolmbrown@... writes:

The three phase is 36Vac 500Hz which really chucks a spanner in the transformer design.
The main issue is to get the thin laminations you need for 500 Hz. I suppose they are available, as used in aircraft transformers, but maybe really difficult to get in small quantities.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
Nondum ex silvis sumus
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK


 

开云体育

Hi Guys

Actually, you can use a 50/60 Hz xfmr up there at 500Hz just fine
with no extra core dissipation.
The flux density is reduced due to the mag current being proportionately less.
the losses are roughly the same.

Its just that they dont do that for aircraft supplies due to weight.

These days with SMPS, who uses big iron any more?

Al D.


On 12/19/2013 06:46 PM, John Woodgate wrote:
smalcolmbrown@... writes:

>The three phase is 36Vac 500Hz which really chucks a spanner in the
>transformer design.

The main issue is to get the thin laminations you need for 500 Hz. I
suppose they are available, as used in aircraft transformers, but maybe
really difficult to get in small quantities.

-- 

AC2CL 

I do not think there is any thrill that 
can go through the human heart like that felt by the inventor as 
he sees some creation of the brain unfolding to success... 
Such emotions make a man forget food, sleep, friends, love, everything. 

- Nikola Tesla 

 


 

Thanks interesting

I know that you can use a considerably smaller core at 500 Hz and less windings per volt. This is where the weight savings occur for avionics use.

I I have thought about the use of a switched mode, mainly for valve amplifiers, but wonder about the extremes of generating 800V DC at high frequency. I have not seen high speed rectifiers with greater than a 100 V rating. I guess that they exist, but the price tag is prolly horrendous and or the supply limited to defence contractors only.

The circuit I'm playing with, dates from WW2. It discharges 0.7 Joules in 2uS every 20mS (350Kw) into a 24:1 step up transformer… Yes 10kV pulses… Everything about this circuit is extreme.

Best regards


Suusi M-B


 

开云体育

Hi Suusi


On 12/21/2013 04:05 AM, smalcolmbrown@... wrote:
I I have thought about the use of a switched mode, mainly for valve amplifiers, but wonder about the extremes of generating 800V DC at high frequency. I have not seen high speed rectifiers with greater than a 100 V rating. I guess that they exist, but the price tag is prolly horrendous and or the supply limited to defence contractors only.


Not too long ago,
i played with switch mode HeNe laser power supplies.
The voltages and currents there are similar.
The rectifiers are stacks of low voltage fast recovery types.
I remember that they werent expensive.
(You could stack your own 4148s, theyre cheap.)

This might help:



The circuit I'm playing with, dates from WW2. It discharges 0.7 Joules in 2uS every 20mS (350Kw) into a 24:1 step up transformer… Yes 10kV pulses… Everything about this circuit is extreme.


Sounds like an old radar?
Fun!


-- 

AC2CL 

I do not think there is any thrill that 
can go through the human heart like that felt by the inventor as 
he sees some creation of the brain unfolding to success... 
Such emotions make a man forget food, sleep, friends, love, everything. 

- Nikola Tesla 

 


 

Yes it is a FuG 200 Radar set. I like reverse engineering things to see how they work. I understand PPI its the other approaches that I find interesting.

a stack of 1N4148's shudder a large stack then. Ta for the Idea. I think I got as far as 5?Schottky

?power devices and gave up.

Damn Yahoo still is not letting me have POP3 access to my email and the interface still doesn't like html emails :( It has been a week and a half since this happened and they still have not replied to my complaint :(


Merry Yule to all

Suusi M-B


 

Use UF4007(SF4007), they are 1A, 1000V, 75nS Trr and cheap. 1n4148 have only 75volt reveres voltage.

10pcs. in series gives 10KV. I would use 11 to have som margen.

The biggest problem with this kinds of circuits are corona, and do you have any expiriences about corona? or else dont mess around with this kind of curcuit. It is highly dangerus.
?
Med venlig hilsen, Kinds regards
Kim Borg Nielsen


On Saturday, December 21, 2013 9:40 PM, "smalcolmbrown@..." wrote:
?
Yes it is a FuG 200 Radar set. I like reverse engineering things to see how they work. I understand PPI its the other approaches that I find interesting.

a stack of 1N4148's shudder a large stack then. Ta for the Idea. I think I got as far as 5?Schottky
?power devices and gave up.

Damn Yahoo still is not letting me have POP3 access to my email and the interface still doesn't like html emails :( It has been a week and a half since this happened and they still have not replied to my complaint :(

Merry Yule to all

Suusi M-B



John Woodgate
 

In message <1387726122.76180.YahooMailNeo@...>, dated Sun, 22 Dec 2013, kim nielsen <dkkiboni@...> writes:

Use UF4007(SF4007), they are 1A, 1000V, 75nS Trr and cheap. 1n4148 have only 75volt reveres voltage.

10pcs. in series gives 10KV. I would use 11 to have som margen.
Even so, I would put 1 meg resistors **rated for 1000 V at least** across each diode. Vishay VR37 type, for example.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
Nondum ex silvis sumus
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK


 

开云体育

While following this thread, it just dawned on me that I do not know how to measure 3 phase power.? Any suggestions how to do this in real life and ofcourse in LTspice as well.
?
Michael
?

To: LTspice@...
From: jmw@...
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2013 15:41:16 +0000
Subject: Re: [LTspice] RE: A three Phase question please

?
In message <1387726122.76180.YahooMailNeo@...>,
dated Sun, 22 Dec 2013, kim nielsen writes:

>Use UF4007(SF4007), they are 1A, 1000V, 75nS Trr and cheap. 1n4148 have
>only 75volt reveres voltage.
>
>10pcs. in series gives 10KV. I would use 11 to have som margen.

Even so, I would put 1 meg resistors **rated for 1000 V at least**
across each diode. Vishay VR37 type, for example.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
Nondum ex silvis sumus
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK


 

开云体育

Measuring 3-Phase power is exactly the same as measuring single-phase power, except you have to do it 3 times.
In practice you need a measurement set-up that monitors the vectorial product of voltage and current.
It could be an electrodynamic dual-coil meter, or a digital wattmeter.
In LTspice, use the standard method thrice.


Le 23/12/2013 18:36, Michael Peter a crit:

While following this thread, it just dawned on me that I do not know how to measure 3 phase power. Any suggestions how to do this in real life and ofcourse in LTspice as well.

Michael


To: LTspice@...
From: jmw@...
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2013 15:41:16 +0000
Subject: Re: [LTspice] RE: A three Phase question please

In message <1387726122.76180.YahooMailNeo@...>,
dated Sun, 22 Dec 2013, kim nielsen writes:

>Use UF4007(SF4007), they are 1A, 1000V, 75nS Trr and cheap. 1n4148 have
>only 75volt reveres voltage.
>
>10pcs. in series gives 10KV. I would use 11 to have som margen.

Even so, I would put 1 meg resistors **rated for 1000 V at least**
across each diode. Vishay VR37 type, for example.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See
Nondum ex silvis sumus
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK