开云体育

Hello, Some additionals features : Some options for future releases. Christmas is over, but it will be for next year:) - MultiTabs per plot setting could be very nice, especially when we changed

I have uploaded an example schematic featuring the Quad 303 output stage </g/LTspice/files/Temp/Quad-triple_DC.zip>. -- Regards, Tony

If your amp is in a high gain negative feedback loop, it can be harder to see the crossover distortion because the feedback look "eliminates" most of it.? Getting rid of that feedback would make it

Yes. To "see" it, as a distorted- looking sinewave, you need to make the distortion bad enough so that it stands out.? Visually looking at sinewaves, they generally need to be pretty bad for humans

You can also do this with a .DC analysis. With this it's also very easy to do a "wingspread" plot, which plots the incremental gain, which is very revealing. -- Regards, Tony

...and apply a very low input signal when running the transient test.

1.Use.TRAN analysis, not .AC, because that doesn't show non-linearity. 2. Check that the current through the output devices is very small with no input signal. -- This email has been checked for

If I build a Class B amplifier (all have cross over distortion) What do I have to do, to see cross over in a trace... All I get is a perfect looking sign wave... What would be the analysis and steps

Dave, I just uploaded the file "MF_VCpot.zip". I got tired of trying to allocate floating net names to different pots. I chose the pin name as "PC", because it is the Pot Control pin. Feel free to

Bumping this to the top I had uploaded a couple of circuits yesterday. Can an LTspice subcircuit guru help me with passing a parameter, as below? relay_driver: can use this subcircuit for each of the

“Correcting” V1 to 311V peak / 220 V RMS, after a full minute of settling down, I measure: rb: RMS(v(b))=210.556 FROM 0 TO 0.02 rc: RMS(v(c))=219.988 FROM 0 TO 0.02 rd: RMS(v(d))=229.341 FROM 0 TO

@eT, I really appreciate your contribution here.I will use it in design.

That's usually the value that matters. At lower voltages, the (calculated) inductance is normally higher, because of the nonlinearity of the B-H curve. But the small-signal inductance (as measured by

That's because the circuit is in transient regime. You have to wait several minutes for the system to be in steady-state. Look how the voltages and currentsare asymmetrical vs. 0V/0A in the first

If you're talking about autotransformers with Si-iron laminate cores, then be careful with inductance measurements. John Woodgate kindly reminded me previously about relying on small-signa

:{) As long as the one working with the model understands that it’s not really 220VRMS, it works. In the end, it’s one constant to change, and it all works the same. I doubt even 1 Amp is used at

Just a couple or three observations: 1. Try and get hold of a real 2.2 KVA auto transformer and measure the resistance and inductance of its windings. To compare real and theoretical solutions. I find

I’ll look at that, thanks! Switching primary taps will throw off the 18VAC winding, which adds complexity to analyzing the AC Stabilizer over-all design, but that’s the way Hasan’s (photo)

Hi Your uploaded example appears to be a transformer with a multi-tapped primary that maintains 18v output at the secondary. I've uploaded an example "Multi_Tapped_Transformer_eT.zip" eT

A wee bit, perhaps, but it’s a work in progress, and maybe a collaborative effort. RE: The measurements, I tried 0 compression, and the voltages changed by mV’s. There were markable fewer data