开云体育

iamrogerholden wrote: "will the XT compatible IV continue to be available" If you read what Linear Tech has to say about it (on the webpage where you can download both programs), you should have

Hello to All, This topic has a rather lengthy response indeed. I don't have a specific response, just a suggestion. I have a copy of a book that I have found very helpful in some of the designs I have

Howdy I am tying myself in knots trying to examine the buildup of phase in a relatively simple regulator circuit. I have uploaded Phase Analysis.zip to the files section. File darlington.asc contains

Hello iamrogerholden You wrote : "....and do I have to prevent LTspice updates to avoid an automatic XVII installation ?" I have tried to install LTspice XVII under Vista (I have not XP) : Nothing

I am seriously concerned about the implications of this thread, I only use XP as it is compatible with all my other tools, does not randomly crash/freeze up and is no longer patched/botched by

Hello Gunoiar You wrote : "No XP?..........and so on to go out on a whim of some marketing guy that prompts me to upgrade to his last contraption. Been there, done that! And now comes LTC (or shell I

The timestamps, as they appear in my mail, are positively amazing. I hope this gets corrected, eventually. Vlad ______________________ ltspicegoodies.ltwiki.org -- holding, among others: a universal

Hello Andy, He used by accident XVII86.exe instead of XVII64.exe. PWL is now working after he has used XVII64.exe. I wrote him a private email for this solution, because of the big delays of messages

Thanks alan.revera That is really helpful

"But when I try to install the 64 bit version, it installs the 32 bit. Don't know why?" You must have a 64-bit O.S. to run the 64-bit version. Chances are your Windows is 32-bit. You could install

alainstas141 wrote: "I think I 'm going to continue to use LT spice IV " I think that is the best approach for now. That's what I would do. Unless you have an absolute need to use LTspiceXVII's newer

Craig wrote: " ? Maybe someone who's locked into XP could try dual-booting with Linux to run LTspice and let us know how it goes." I'm pretty sure at least two people here have already reported that

Many Linux users dual-boot with Windows for the few Windows programs without Linux equivalents (Intuit, I'm talking to you). Maybe someone who's locked into XP could try dual-booting with Linux to run

While I can't speak for Mike, I can say that often such restrictions are based on the tools used to build the program. Since XP is (past) EOL, many tools don't support generating new programs for it.

Surely LTspice IV runs on XP and will continue to do so. As I understand it, the new graphics engine in XVII doesn't work on those legacy versions of Windows, which is hardly a surprise. With best

It would seem reasonable for Mike to provide a short explanation of the technical reasons for not providing compatibility with XP (would it have been that costly?). A significant part of the world

Hello Indeed running the 64 bits makes the PWL work. Thanks

Helmut wrote: "I have again problems with delayed or not delivered messages." It's not only your problem. Yahoo is being hammered with problems this last week. Those long delays are showing up all

Thanks to everyone who expertly explained how to accomplish this.? With all your help I was able to get my simulation to work?using the table of test data I collected.?? Thank you for helping

Hello, When you normally install LTspiceXVII on a 64bit system, LTspice will install both versions, XVII64.exe. and XVII86.exe. Use XVII64.exe and the PWL will work. Best regards, Helmut