¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date
Re: Analog Devices to buy LT!
ADI has its own in-house simulator, ADICE. It doesn't have the integrated schematic capture and waveform processing tools, but it's a very nice simulator. They're not likely to make it available to
By Craig Lambert · #89795 ·
Re: Analog Devices to buy LT!
acquisition is for synergy hence lower cost the product lines will be affected
By Lilian · #89794 ·
Re: Analog Devices to buy LT!
How will this affect LTspice? These news come very soon after the XVII alpha, it sounds very strange for me. I hope things will not change for Mike's sector. Vlad ______________________
By Vlad · #89793 ·
Re: Pending acquisition of LTC by ADI
Agree. Mike is associated with the power management group and has no ¡°mandate¡± to deal with RF parts, for example (he told me this on his last World Tour). Would not surprise me if that continues.
By Jim Wagner · #89792 ·
Re: INA282
Interesting, thank for the info. It good to know it actually matured product, lesser risk. ------------- Riscy J ------------- Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 8:32 PM To: [LTspice] group Subject: Re:
By Riscy · #89790 ·
Re: Pending acquisition of LTC by ADI
Not likely, right now LTspice models for many LT parts are not available since LTspice tends to cater to their department mostly. -- Cecil - k5nwa http://thepartsplace.k5nwa.com/
By Cecil Bayona · #89791 ·
Re: Pending acquisition of LTC by ADI
Perfect? Sent from Yahoo Mail. Get the app
By peeryanastasiaxj@... · #89789 ·
Pending acquisition of LTC by ADI
Perhaps this impending acquisition may improve the availability of LTSpice moodels for ADI parts? Bruce
By Bruce Griffiths · #89788 ·
Re: INA282
Hello riscy00 You wrote : "I found the INA282_test.zip and decided it solve my problem. I think it the name error. " Did you want to write the Same error ? Regards PhB
By @theeten2 · #89787 ·
Re: NEW libraries LTspice
"opam(p) NJM2903" ?That one is easily found on the web. I found it here: http://www.njr.com/semicon/products/NJM2903.html It's not really an op-amp. It is a comparator. Similar, but different. I
By Andy · #89786 ·
Re: Analog Devices to buy LT!
Greetings. ADI has a good CAD org and I know most of those people,, They have 1 or 2 extremely talented algorithmic specialists.. Long term they will integrate Mike into that organization unless
By dg1@... · #89785 ·
Re: Analog Devices to buy LT!
That would be really great!!......now we wait do ti to aquire ltc and adi next to extend library more....that would be really great! LTspice@...> wrote:
By Riscy · #89784 ·
Re: Analog Devices to buy LT!
Hello, I see no problem for the future of LTspice after this acquisition by Analog devices. I read in the web that ADI is very interested on the power management ICs from LTC. I also see the advantage
By Helmut Sennewald · #89783 ·
NEW libraries LTspice
sombody can I help me, I ned to use LTSpice IV but i don finde the next components: FET: RJK0632JPD 2SK1580 2SK3577 opam NJM2903
By gomezmemanuel@... · #89782 ·
Re: Cap param with parasitic elements
Now it's clear what I can do, there are few solutions to my problem. I thank All of you that have helped me. Best Regards atreiooo
By atreiooo · #89781 ·
Re: Cap param with parasitic elements
Dear theeten2, your propose does not make error, but Rser and Lser are ignored by LTspice
By atreiooo · #89780 ·
Re: INA282
Hello, I haven't read all the previous postings. I just read that there has been already an example in the Lib-folder from 2012. INA282_test.zip
By Helmut Sennewald · #89777 ·
Re: INA282
Hello, I just uploaded an example with the INA282 in the Temp-folder. INA282_test.zip https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/LTspice/files/%20Temp/
By Helmut Sennewald · #89776 ·
Re: INA282
Actually, the INA282 is not very new. T.I.'s newest SPICE models for it are 5 years old. The datasheet is newer, but was originally written in 2009, and the INA282 evaluation module user guide is 6
By Andy · #89775 ·
Re: course of HOWTO build models like (sanken) STR-A6100
At 10:04 AM (-0700) 7/27/2016, ericsson.sunshine wrote: ---------- Original Message ---------- >Hi, Jim: > >Thank you. I am trying. > >But some info like "discharge" mechanism, not mentioned in the
By jtanalog · #89774 ·