开云体育

Your feedback is much appreciated, thank you for the kind words. Vlad

Here's the pertinent excerpt: "Free Downloadable Spice Tools Capture And Simulate Analog Circuits" by Don Tuite, Electronic Design, Oct. 23, 2012 (web edition). How Engelhardt Made LTspice Engelhardt

A sincere thanks for your input, but most of what you write is only vaguely in the neighborhood of being factual (too bad you didn't bother to read the LTwiki page originally linked before posting so

Hello. I have recently downloaded Ltspice and am trying to run a simulation with a triode tube in but I get an error. I think this is because the triode needs a subcircuit macromodel that I need to

thank you, have a nice day;

Thanks a lot Vlad. You抳e done a very good job I抳e download your last update Your examples work now Didier De : LTspice@... [mailto:LTspice@...] De la part de imbvlad Envoy� :

Hi Helmut, I truly appreciate your help in resolving the problem. Thank you for attention in this matter and your kind co-operation. Best Regards, Shravan krishna

In message <ksikp7+rtse@...>, dated Mon, 22 Jul 2013, jean_claudeabeille <jean_claudeabeille@...> writes: This site is helpful, and the information is largely reliable:

Thank you, Andy, the answers were clear. I read the first part of B. Cordell's book but didn't found there the explanations of the basic principles of the amp's operating mode. And that, after reading

Hi Bryan. Look Mutual_Inductance_K=F(V)_V2.zip in /TEMP In my case, made 鈥嬧�媡wo related inductance of the four sub-schemes and four nonlinear resistors. The coupling coefficient is equal to

John, Thanks for the follow-up question. Bryan

Helmut, Thanks for your initial response and later addition on the possible alternative. Bryan

jean_claudeabeille wrote: I uploaded the new corrected one along with the missing components files : Still has errors. Still missing the LF353. LTspice is looking for the schematic symbol (.asy file).

thank you Helmut for your patience and answers. Now, it's more clear in my mind. Besides, some answers didn't satisfy me : R4 and especially D4 and R12. How does my amp can work since it is in this

Macy wrote: .model PN4250 PNP(Is=6.734f Xti=3 Eg=1.11 Vaf=45.7 Bf=388.2 Ne=1.806 > ... Parentheses were never needed there. Unless I am mistaken, they are treated like whitespace. This goes back to

In message <kshfhj+al36@...>, dated Sun, 21 Jul 2013, Helmut <helmutsennewald@...> writes: That will compensate them for losing the first two cricket Test Matches, but not 100%. (;-) --

Hello, I want only remind that Mike is on tour in Australia this week. http://www.linear.com/company/events.php?tt=LTspice&ci=&sp=&fd=&td=

Hello Jean, My answers are below. R4 has to be ideally connected to the output as I did. Then the offset of the amplifier output will be only the offset of U1B. If we connect R4to the net "C5", the

http://www.emcs.org/acstrial/newsletters/spring10/ABriefSPICE.pdf Simulation Program with Integrated Circuit Emphasis

OK. I agree, on your schematic, the amp works fine. Problem is : why did you changed, added components and changed some wires : - output on R4 in place of C5 - D5 instead of Q5 - D4 added - Q11 PNP