¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date
Re: Measure statements description to find cut off frequency
Hello,Helmut, ? Thank you so much. my problem has soleved! ? Shukichi ________________________________ To: LTspice@... Sent: Saturday, July 20, 2013 6:26 PM Subject: [LTspice] Re:
By shukichi2079 · #64909 ·
Re: Step Change to k of Coupled Inductors During Transient Analysis
In message <ksdlam+2tic@...>, dated Sat, 20 Jul 2013, Helmut <helmutsennewald@...> writes: But is there another way to change K at a specified time during a .tran simulation? -- OOO -
By John Woodgate <jmw@...> · #64908 ·
Re: MPS4250
In message <MfjOdgDTQl6RFw$6@...>, dated Sat, 20 Jul 2013, John Woodgate <jmw@...> writes: They were stripped out by the server. The important one is:
By John Woodgate <jmw@...> · #64907 ·
Re: Step Change to k of Coupled Inductors During Transient Analysis
Hello Bryan, The answer is no. Everything defined with .param will be evaluated at the beginning of a simulation and is then constant for the whole simulation. Best regards, Helmut
By Helmut Sennewald · #64906 ·
Re: Measure statements description to find cut off frequency
Hello Shukichi, Please take a look the examples from our Files-section. Files > Tut > MEASURE > AC http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/LTspice/files/%20Tut/MEASURE/AC/ Best regards, Helmut
By Helmut Sennewald · #64905 ·
Measure statements description to find cut off frequency
Hello. Regarding to AC simulation. I want to know cut off frequency using ".measure" statements. In LT spice help, I found how to describe band-width but I don't know how to describe to find cut off
By shukichi2079 · #64904 ·
Re: MPS4250
In message <ksdh55+evd7@...>, dated Sat, 20 Jul 2013, jean_claudeabeille <jean_claudeabeille@...> writes: OK, I would like it. I sent this text from yahoo mail and never received the
By John Woodgate <jmw@...> · #64903 ·
Re: MPS4250
By jean_claudeabeille <jean_claudeabeille@...> · #64902 ·
Re: Ltc3765 & 3766 combo dc/dc simulation goes wild
By oleka111 · #64901 ·
Re: POW(X,Y) doesn¡¯t work in a function directive with the x**y syntax
Hello Didier The reason for that is because of the syntax for .func, it should be by the book: .func f(x) {...} not f(x)=... There may also be some outdated symbols/libraries. I'll make the changes
By Vlad · #64899 ·
Step Change to k of Coupled Inductors During Transient Analysis
Greetings, I'm interested in applying a step change to the coupling coefficient of two coupled inductors during transient analysis at a desired time. Is this something that can be done using the .func
By [email protected] · #64900 ·
Re: MAX4173H
By Helmut Sennewald · #64898 ·
Re: how can i make a susceptance with LTspice
In message <CALBs-Ti=EVmQ7Kze1GxnidYUebsgYMnm-M_Ne3BY9jBsRLbA4A@...>, dated Fri, 19 Jul 2013, Andy <Andrew.Ingraham@...> writes: I think the question is whether one can enter a
By John Woodgate <jmw@...> · #64897 ·
Re: LTspice Genealogy - The Heritage of Simulation Ubiquity
Hi Helmut, I just corrected a major omission (our LTspice group!): http://ltwiki.org/index.php5?title=LTspice_Genealogy_-_The_Heritage_of_Simulation_Ubiquity#Important_Follow-on_Enhancements
By analog spiceman · #64896 ·
Re: MAX4173H
Okkar Moe Myint <okkarmoemyint@...> wrote: .. This webpage: http://www.maximintegrated.com/design/tools/modeling-simulation/spice/current-sense-amps/macro/ has a "macromodel" (which is a SPICE
By Andy I · #64895 ·
Re: LTspice Genealogy - The Heritage of Simulation Ubiquity
By Helmut Sennewald · #64894 ·
Re: LTspice Genealogy - The Heritage of Simulation Ubiquity
--- In LTspice@..., Helmut <helmutsennewald@...> wrote: > --- In LTspice@..., analogspiceman wrote: >> --- In LTspice@..., Helmut <helmutsennewald@> wrote: > >>> I
By analog spiceman · #64893 ·
Re: how can i make a susceptance with LTspice
He <he.yang@...> wrote: Is there a susceptance in LTspice, that i can direct use? A capacitor, or an inductor, are susceptance elements. You might want to make sure they have no parasitic
By Andy I · #64892 ·
Re: Adding INA105 psipce model into LTspice
Hello, I have looked for similar part and found an example with the INA132. It was easy to modify this part for teh INA105. Files > Lib > INA105_test.zip
By Helmut Sennewald · #64891 ·
POW(X,Y) doesn¡¯t work in a function directive with the x**y syntax
Hello, I've checked this with a Bsource both two syntaxes work fine b3 n001 0 v=(pow(-1,round((- 2 *((1)-1)/2+1)/- 1))) b1 n002 0 v=(-1)**round((- 2 *(1 -1)/2+1)/- 1) With a bsource using a function
By didier <didier.cadinot@...> · #64890 ·