开云体育

Hi, Problem: How to delete *.raw files between successive simulation jobs while using the queue manager. Background: I use the queue manager to run Monte-Carlo sims on the same circuit with different

In message <CANZ6rKyEwfYVCbrESnaTSuQVpk9_uNbQTtxFZUHKvs9uE-sxfQ@...>, dated Mon, 15 Apr 2013, DEVISREE bala <baladevisree2@...> writes: You have to put some effort into helping

hi i am designing an op amp,but i dont know how two simulate circuit.pls reply me

In message <736066489.391198.1366041523194.JavaMail.root@.... comcast.net>, dated Mon, 15 Apr 2013, Jim Wagner <wagnejam99@...> writes: The plot thickens. The chances of

In message <kkh7vu+igoh@...>, dated Mon, 15 Apr 2013, sawreyrw <sawreyrw@...> writes: Well, it's sufficiently true up to some frequency (depending on the definition of 'sufficiently'),

In message <CALBs-TimcdbfLAxu36m7Ee1HQ-dynXhchgbbKNqC+zGjJWvJWw@...>, dated Mon, 15 Apr 2013, Andy <Andrew.Ingraham@...> writes: Indeed: in that case the gain formula gets more

Same problem with Safari browser on Mac. Jim Wagner Oregon Research Electronics

John, This is true only at low frequcncies, and that's the reason the OP wants to know the effect as a function of frequency. Obviously, he needs to do this

Within the range where the op-amp has infinite gain, sure. At 1 MHz, I doubt it. He's talking about R2 variations at high frequencies, getting Bode plots. Under those conditions, the assumption falls

What I mean here is, in the circuit whether it is 10KHz variation of R2 or that of vin, your opamp always 'thinks' the same- it is working at 10KHz.

In message <CALBs-TjeU10HN8E+Ba97R=LTNiyy-2ar5jyNQunNBcHqRv1Hqw@...>, dated Mon, 15 Apr 2013, Andy <Andrew.Ingraham@...> writes: That could explain why some of us now don't see the

In message <CALBs-TjHj0Lx41mORJzKDHfd+kPbe+U=GYY+WhLO1MsP+7LKGw@...>, dated Mon, 15 Apr 2013, Andy <Andrew.Ingraham@...> writes: Doesn't varying R2 just vary the gain by which the DC

I am not sure what you mean. But an op-amp is no different than other components. Frequency applies to every thing in the circuit, not just op-amps. That's an interesting hypothesis, but I think it's

Like the question about labeling hundreds of nodes, that doesn't always work. I already have way too much stuff on my Desktop. Also, one of the computers is shared and I like to keep my regular files

Hi Andy, Thanks for your response, but I do understand step vs slope. My question was actually about some difference in the syntax of the statement examples (which I couldn't detect). For some reason

Hello All, @ Andy& Jim:Thanks for your input on tmax in .tran analysis. It was really useful and I plan to have a different thread on this soon. Now coming to the issue in thread, I have this feeling

Hello John, This was indeed the trick to get a "useful" result for THD in the .FOUR report. I have had used 10us rise and fall time in my example which I uploaded yesterday. Best regards, Helmut

In message <kkfbb8+osfi@...>, dated Sun, 14 Apr 2013, Echidna <mchambin@...> writes: You are getting these results because of your very short rise and fall times and short 'crossover'

In message <kkf8qp+pa6i@...>, dated Sun, 14 Apr 2013, sawreyrw <sawreyrw@...> writes: It's well-known to be incurable. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk They took me

In message <CALBs-TgwdGnyE+6k-DsnYM_d3xZ2OrmE-xvRep2TEYTBQCGQuQ@...>, dated Sun, 14 Apr 2013, Andy <Andrew.Ingraham@...> writes: Can you save it to your desktop, to make it easier to