Re: SPICE Error
Hi, thanks so much for helping me solving the problem.. But both solution (adding Roff and changing the ground position) are giving different results. So I wonder which one should I use. Also Tony,
By
Tan Micheline Tambayong <micheline.tambayong@...>
·
#47132
·
|
Re: SPICE Error
Hi, The GND is in the wrong place. Please see corrected circuit in TEMP folder Regards _____ I am using the Free version of SPAMfighter <http://www.spamfighter.com/len> . SPAMfighter has removed 3438
By
Ian <iw1904@...>
·
#47131
·
|
Re: Bottom posting.
Some clients make it very hard to bottom post. Others make it hard to top-post. Some make it hard to do one for html and the other for non-html. Please don't assume that every one else's e-mail client
By
wagnerj@...
·
#47130
·
|
Re: Ideal Swich Model missing
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 19:12:35 +0100, you wrote: >In message <j500ob+lpdp@...>, dated Fri, 16 Sep 2011, >analogspiceman <analogspiceman@...> writes: > >>Well, people keeping complaining
By
John Fields <jbfields3@...>
·
#47129
·
|
Re: Bottom posting.
I didn't know Helmut was Italian! Thanks.
By
thutches
·
#47128
·
|
Bottom posting.
Helmut bottom posts, and it's his group. In Rome, shouldn't we do what the Romans do? -- JF
By
John Fields <jbfields3@...>
·
#47127
·
|
Re: Strange impedance curve
Ok, that was a good thing to learn... Thanks everyone! /Johan
By
gasoltroll
·
#47126
·
|
Re: What changes would make LTspice better? - an improved diode type filter
LTspice is not intended as a parametric search for all possible diodes. You setup your schematic, choose the approriate parts and put them into LTspice. LTspice is only for simulating an existent
By
schockenbaum
·
#47125
·
|
Re: spice problem :-(
Thanx John, I will spend the rest of this day with searching the lib .lib ararchnid.mod. I think the best is to search in www3. best regards ...
By
Leo Baumann
·
#47124
·
|
Re: spice problem :-(
Yes, GaN FETs are perhaps godd for that. I've thought about that. They are good, if they have a large input resistance and low input capacity. I will check that. best regards ...
By
Leo Baumann
·
#47123
·
|
Re: Implementing BSS138 spice model
By
wind.carsten
·
#47121
·
|
Re: spice problem :-(
In message <j57d86+fkkg@...>, Charly Engineering <charly020664@...> writes You need to .lib arachnid.mod, which you can download from the Web. -- This is my travelling signature, adding
By
John M Woodgate <jmw@...>
·
#47122
·
|
Re: spice problem :-(
Hello Leo, To my mind the ideal device for your circuit is the old VMP4 - a first generation VMOSFET from Siliconix from about 25years ago. These devices had a remarkable combination of properties,
By
Tony Casey <tony@...>
·
#47119
·
|
Re: Strange impedance curve
gasoltroll wrote: What that probably did was move the series inductance so it is no longer in parallel with the (unspecified but non-zero by default) parallel capacitance, Cpar. Andy
By
Andy I
·
#47120
·
|
Re: Strange impedance curve
Helmut wrote: Interesting. This is one of those cases where the default value is not zero, but the Help doesn't tell you this. Judging by the Help, I would have thought that the default would be zero.
By
Andy I
·
#47118
·
|
Re: model, subckt tube EC81 = 6R4
... I've never seen that, he must have had the idea for the radiator in the second of my birth or he had no wood for his fireplace at home .... best regards Leo...
By
Leo Baumann
·
#47117
·
|
Re: model, subckt tube EC81 = 6R4
Tube life is related more to the temperature of their envelope, if the heater is reliably constructed. http://members.shaw.ca/legg/2000a.html I'm not sure that you can assume a more reliable tube
By
boid_twitty
·
#47116
·
|
spice problem :-(
Hi folks, my LTspice-version has problems with that circuit :-) help! best regards Leo ...
By
Leo Baumann
·
#47115
·
|
Re: Implementing BSS138 spice model
<snip> </snip> Hello Carsten, 1. The MN prefix tells SPICE that the device is an N-channel MOSFET. 2. An intrinsic device is a fancy name for a circuit element that is built in to the SPICE code.
By
Tony Casey <tony@...>
·
#47114
·
|
Re: SPICE Error
By
Tony Casey <tony@...>
·
#47113
·
|