¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Re: round () function on AC measurements does crash on old versions and just delivers zero at latest version
From the Help, under Waveform Arithmetic: /The functions Re(x) and Im(x) are available for complex data and return a complex number with the real part equal to the real or imaginary part of the
By John Woodgate · #160519 ·
Re: round () function on AC measurements does crash on old versions and just delivers zero at latest version
I missed that you wrote this: I thought maybe it appeared when you pasted it into the message.? Is that funny character there in the .LOG file too? I'm thinking the degree character (¡ã) was written
By Andy I · #160518 ·
Re: round () function on AC measurements does crash on old versions and just delivers zero at latest version
I don't know if this is related -- But mag() returns a complex number in .AC analysis.? Perhaps round() can only take a real argument.? Giving round() a complex argument might be the cause of both
By Andy I · #160517 ·
Re: round () function on AC measurements does crash on old versions and just delivers zero at latest version
On 20/05/2025 15:51, oerni via groups.io wrote: > using round to get better readable results (e.g. mV's with one further number after the dot) in the measurements does not work for me in AC
By Tony Casey · #160516 ·
Re: Execute .meas file
Dave, I think you are making this more complicated than it is, by doing it that way. Unless you have your LTspice configured to "Automatically delete .RAW files", uou should never need to make a copy
By Andy I · #160515 ·
round () function on AC measurements does crash on old versions and just delivers zero at latest version
using round to get better readable results (e.g. mV's with one further number after the dot) in the measurements does not work for me in AC measurements while it works fine for TRAN. running .AC the
By oerni@... · #160514 ·
Re: Execute .meas file
Dave, When you loaded the schematic, and View > Visible Traces didn't work, was the .RAW file in the same place? That would make LTspice unable to find it.? That's the only thing I can think of. Andy
By Andy I · #160513 ·
Re: Execute .meas file
To follow up, loading a .raw file directly then works to execute .meas files. So, answering my original question, after a complete Run, save (in Settings) the raw file(s), or make a copy, while the
By Bell, Dave · #160512 ·
Re: Execute .meas file
I closed LTspice along with the schematic, then opened just the sch. View, either by right-clicking the schematic, or from the View menu option, has Visible Traces grayed out until a Run. I haven¡¯t
By Bell, Dave · #160511 ·
Re: Execute .meas file
You can also open a .RAW file directly into LTspice, and see all your waveforms, and maybe run .MEAS scripts.? But doing it that way, they won't be associated with a schematic.? To re-establish the
By Andy I · #160510 ·
Re: Execute .meas file
Thanks, Andy! 1. Yeah, the .RAW is what I thought. But if I rename that with a different extension, it still runs the script. In the Help. there¡¯s a hint that it can also derive data from the Plot.
By Bell, Dave · #160509 ·
Re: Execute .meas file
I am not in the habit of running .MEAS scripts, so my answers may or may not help Bell, Dave wrote: I would not think you need any temporary files.? I could be wrong, but I think you need only the
By Andy I · #160508 ·
Re: LT1680
I am not employed by Analog Devices, but I can say with high confidence that the LTspice LT1680 model is correct and it simply did not include those two pins because they aren't needed in the
By Andy I · #160507 ·
Re: LT1680
I mentioned this already, but I think it is worth a bit more elaboration.??John Woodgate wrote: SPICE/LTspice simulations are never meant to constitute the full and complete design database for a
By Andy I · #160506 ·
Re: LT1680
Andy I I studied the datasheet, I know that it is my final responsibility to make design choices according to my skills, but I believe that the community serves the purpose of sharing problems and
By Pietro · #160505 ·
Re: LT1680
Oops, my reply was sent prematurely.? I started writing: I concluded that "Iavg" and "Iave" were probably the same, and that "Vfb" and "FB" are probably the same.? But again, it is your job to
By Andy I · #160504 ·
Re: LT1680
Who is the design engineer?? If that is you, then you must be the master of your design.? You need to take full responsibility for understanding what the circuit does and how every part of it works.
By Andy I · #160503 ·
Re: LT1680
Luned¨¬ 19 maggio 2025 alle 23:12, John Woodgate ha scritto:
By Pietro · #160502 ·
Re: LT1680
S¨¬, scusa. Mi sono confuso. *[Translation to English by Moderator:]* Yes, sorry. I got confused.
Re: LT1680
Your upload is helpful, but you must post in English. Google Translate is your friend. -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software. www.avg.com
By John Woodgate · #160500 ·