¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Re: LT1680
Se vuoi dare un'occhiata, ho caricato un file immagine nella sezione foto. Ok, va bene, ma poi, quando dovr¨° progettare e costruire il tutto, come collegher¨° i pin mancanti? E ??poi, funzioner¨¤
Re: LT1680
I have not looked at yet - but it is very common for SPICE models to have fewer pins than actual pins.? Also, pin names often vary. Andy
By Andy I · #160494 ·
Re: LT1680
You may get help here, but you should report your problem the ADI's Engineer Zone, because the different pin numbers is clearly ADI's problem. -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG
By John Woodgate · #160493 ·
LT1680
Hi, I am designing a Step-up Booster based on LT1680, for some reasons: 1)Suitable for high power; 2)Through hole package; 3)Simple external architecture. However, there is a discrepancy between the
By Pietro · #160492 ·
Execute .meas file
1. Which temporary file(s) do we need to keep, if we want to return to a model and execute one of several .meas scripts? 2. Is there a way (maybe in batch mode?) to execute a meas script without
By Bell, Dave · #160491 ·
Re: Universal Comparator
No, that was my oops. That was a quick test to see whether that revealed any unexpected behaviour. I hadn't intended to upload that version. 1 ohm is also the output impedance of the built-in opamp
By Tony Casey · #160490 ·
Re: Universal Comparator
Regarding what I thought was the lack of rail-to-rail output drive: I missed what was happening in your test circuit.? I missed the fact that your negative supply voltage V- was at 0V.? Oops. And
By Andy I · #160489 ·
Re: Universal Comparator
My (very) limited measurements suggest that the B-source is about 5-10% slower than an A-source, but that might vary considerably with processor and circuit complexity (I only tried on my Ryzen 9
By Tony Casey · #160488 ·
Re: Universal Comparator
Oops, maybe you missed that one.? An easy oversight. [Edited because this was my mistake.] I am inclined to agree with that.? But I will note that there are some LTspice users who feel its
Re: Universal Comparator
Quite interesting. Me, I tended to use one of LTspice's built-in Digital devices (diffschmitt, etc.) when needing a generic comparator, but they have disadvantages.? Yours is simpler and in many ways
Re: Universal Comparator
Very helpful. It would be good to add a .ZIP of all the files to the folder.
By John Woodgate · #160485 ·
Universal Comparator
All LTspice users should be familiar with UniversalOpamps. There are 7 different UniversalOpAmp models of increasing complexity capable of modelling almost any proprietary opamp to reasonable levels
By Tony Casey · #160484 ·
Re: Single-phase inverter control circuit
Hi Andy Thank you so much for your help! I've used the "UniversalOpAmp2" and It's working now. Thanks for your other advices too.
By guilhermesouzam01@... · #160482 ·
Re: Pease tuneable MFB band-pass filter with level1 device
I already mentioned that, but I guess it didn't get noticed. -- Regards, Tony
By Tony Casey · #160480 ·
Re: Pease tuneable MFB band-pass filter with level1 device
Tim, If? you want a hint about why your schematic doesn't work, I strongly recommend reading in LTspice's Help about the ".inc" and ".lib" commands. (LTspice? > Dot Commands > .INCLUDE -- Include
By Andy I · #160479 ·
Re: Pease tuneable MFB band-pass filter with level1 device
I have renamed your file to "Pease MFB BP filter (Tim Hutcheson).zip". The other name ("Pease MFB BP filter (2).zip") was a rather bad choice for a file that would coexist with John Woodgate's
By Andy I · #160478 ·
Re: Pease tuneable MFB band-pass filter with level1 device
Why would you go to all that trouble?? Just do this: * Delete the old LM4562 symbol * Add a UniversalOpAmp* symbol where the other one was * Optionally, delete the old ".lib LM4562_NS.sub" command It
By Andy I · #160477 ·
Pease tuneable MFB band-pass filter with level1 device
All, I replaced my "Pease MFB BP filter (2).zip" so that it includes the missing UniversalOpAmp1.lib file and created this topic to track it. Tim *[Moderator's note: The filename has been changed to
Re: Single-phase inverter control circuit
Here's another suggestion, if I may add one. When using numbers such as ".008", don't write them that way.? Writing a number with a leading decimal point can lead to mistakes when someone else looks
By Andy I · #160475 ·
Re: Single-phase inverter control circuit
I wrote: I'm somewhat incorrect, in my explanation.? It is not the finite slew-rate that limits their output voltages.? It is the finite open-loop voltage gain, which defaults to Aol=100K.? They
By Andy I · #160474 ·