开云体育

Hello, I am fairly new to LTspice, so my suggestion may not be the best way to go about implementing what you are looking for. However, can the following trick help you? PWL(repeat forever 0 0.01

Dear Dennis, A very good day to you. Again thanks a lot for explaining the insights on how to use .meas intelligently. I am grateful to you, teacher. I looked at figure 5 of the white paper carefully.

Hi, I am trying to create a duty cycle that kind of continuously varying like in a 200ms simulation I want a duty cycle start from 0.01 to 0.99 ?(approximately 0.01 Duty increase per 2 ms). How can I

Hi All How can one restore the Classic Menu in LTSpice Version 24.1.6? Regards ik

That might be so, but I personally doubt it.? Just my opinion. That might be why these UniversalOpamp models lack any explicit provision for Rin(CM).? It seems to have been ignored - even though its

Yes and no. They were re-packaged with altered symbol and model names.? But as far as I know, the innards of each of the models themselves were unchanged by ADI. Andy (

Weren't these models changed soon after AD took over? -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software. www.avg.com

It seems as if whoever designed these Universal Opamps gave no thought whatsoever to a common-mode input impedance.? Not one of them has a parameter for that. If you ground either input pin and

Far from 'universal', then. These surprising issues should be fixed, because the errors caused by the present models could be very serious. Input resistances are often very important in opamp

I also noticed the input impedance issue some time ago.? The model designer(s) of the universal opamp seem to have assumed that all opamps have MOS inputs wherein the input resistance is determined

Definitely my fault. For the confusing. Too much cross references. Regretting..

In two versions , LTspice XVII & V.24, The lib file 'ADI1.lib' has a little difference, in XVII there is one line extra added that caused the error, this line doesn't exist in V.24. Thus, if in

Hi, : I must say sorry, the problem doesn't exist. I just tried in another platform, with XVII & V.24, ran the same file using 'AD746', it runs well. I guess, it's because the search paths

Hi, : The UniversalOpamp model really makes sense, it draws lots current flow. Since it hurts because of the larger power dissipation, so I give a shot by using local 'AD746', it draws much fewer

Problem fixed ... found out how to make Microsoft Edge open .html files, instead of Notepad, in my Laptop App Settings ... bingo ... I must have set up Notepad as the Default when I was adding 3rd

Hi Andy and esims, Re: this Group web site .... I searched the Files, Database and Wiki sections but did not think to look in the Home page .... :( Re: Analog Devices .... I have searched that site

I also remember looking at this, several years ago. Is it possible that this behavior was intentional?? It seems unlikely, but .... Might it have been done this way to be compatible with op-amp

Ian, Analog Devices also still hosts old versions directly on their site. https://ltspice.analog.com/download/24.0.12/LTspice64.msi Eric [email protected]> wrote:

Have you looked at our group's main webpage ( /g/LTspice ) ?? It has links to a few of the older versions on it, including version 24.0.12. See above.? I would rate that very

I have locked this topic.