开云体育

is it possible to build a "Frequency dependent common mode inductor" in LTspice? f Ls Cs Rs [HZ] [uH] [pF] [ohm] 50 2040.3 4966800000 0.11861 100 2023.6 1251600000 0.13833 500 1997.3 50727000 0.47052

The expanded netlist returned few weeks ago in 24.1.3. It shows the components with their parameters immediately at the start of the simulation in the log file. But not the timing related parameters.

OOHH, thanks, I'll look into them.... Let's see if I can associate the symbol of an existing OP with the model I'm interested in, which is the MCP65R46.

FYI, that is not what I suggested.? Leave the Start and Stop (or Left and Right) values alone.? Let LTspice figure them out on its own.? Change the text in the "Quantity Plotted" box.? THAT is the

There are two no, three things you should do: * Verify that the comparator model's subcircuit has the same number of pins in the same order: In+ In- V+ V- OUT. * Change (edit) the name next to the

"Help topics" is the same as pressing F1. Once the Help window opens up, there SHOULD be a column of contents on the left, and the main body on the right.? If you don't see the part on the left, then

This is only a guess here.? But I suspect you have defined User folders for your symbols and models, which reside in one of your account's folders, perhaps under its "Documents" folder or "AppData"

I have a python program kicking off LTspice as a background windows process with the following command. process = await asyncio. create_subprocess_exec ( LTSPICE_PATH , "-b" , "-run" , solverFlag ,

From the ADI data sheet: 110 MHz gain bandwidth (G = 1000) 8 MHz bandwidth (G = 10)

Having just installed V24.1.4, I noticed that: .option measdgt=x ..appears to have been disabled, and doesn't appear to do anything now - the .MEAS time points are now always double precision. The log

Or it suggests that there is a problem with THAT circuit when combined with a very wide-bandwidth op-amp like the AD797 (not 757). The simple circuits I tried for the AD797 ran OK. The fact that your

Have you tried the product selection guides, which most IC vendors and many distributors offer on their websites? There probably is a reason.? It might be worth investigating why.? High-bandwidth

I don't remember with certainty if this is true - but I believe the .TRAN command has numbers when you look at the expanded netlist.? In other words, the formulas have been evaluated.? That is true

When temperature increases, the current resulting from the reverse-biased gate-drain junction increases exponentially, so yes, noise increases with temperature.

I am wondering whether the noise at higher current values won't be affected by the warming of the device.? I know this to be a limiting affect for JFETs.

On 25/02/2025 12:55, eewiz via groups.io wrote: > Tony, I was not out to prove that 2.000000000 volts never happens. > I was out to prove that 2.000000000 volts did not happen in my case. > So that I

I don't have a video card. Mine is on the motherboard. Intel UHD Graphics 750. Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2025 at 5:21 AM From: "Tony Casey via groups.io" <tony@...> To:

Tony, I was not out to prove that 2.000000000 volts never happens. I was out to prove that 2.000000000 volts did not happen in my case. So that I could therefrom propose that the test ".MEAS =

Ok, gracias, lo investigaré.

I mistakenly linked to an older version, but I don't think it had changed much. Newer version: LTSPICE_Manual </g/LTspice/files/z_groups.io/Tut/LTSPICE_Manual.pdf> -- Regards, Tony