Re: Create symbols.
Yes, symbols can be automatically generated from any text file containing a valid .subckt. It doesn't matter what the name of the file is. It can be a .lib or .sub file, but it doesn't have to be. The
By
Tony Casey
·
#158755
·
|
Re: .MEAS Failure
Hi Tony, I have 136GB free space on the drive where the .RAW file grows. I did have Mark Data Points turned on which makes the plot window render many times slower. Also, I can crash the plot window,
By
eewiz
·
#158754
·
|
Re: .MEAS Failure
Note, that the correct time value for this is actually 0.5005005005005... The problem was deliberately set so the answer was an irrational number. -- Regards, Tony
By
Tony Casey
·
#158753
·
|
Re: intuition behind a solution to crashing time domain simulation
#Time-step-too-small
I suppose the OP posted more than one version of the .ASC. I don't think it's worth pursuing any further, but the fact that it runs OK with the simple opamp suggests that there is a problem with the
By
John Woodgate
·
#158752
·
|
Create symbols.
Good morning, I have a question about symbols. Could a symbol be automatically generated from a (.lib) or (.sub) file??.. In this case it would be a comparator. If so, how could I generate it?
By
j.bernabe1@...
·
#158751
·
|
Re: .MEAS Failure
In general, it is usually impossible to prove the non-existence of something. Hardly a phenomenal waste of processor power. Linear interpolation between two points is a trivially simple operation. The
By
Tony Casey
·
#158750
·
|
Re: .MEAS Failure
This is also true with .MEAS. The time points are printed in single precision in the logfile, by default. You can get double precision by adding .option measdgt=15. This is true whether or not you
By
Tony Casey
·
#158749
·
|
Re: .MEAS Failure
On 25/02/2025 06:59, eewiz via groups.io wrote: > .options numdgt=15. caused the plot window to crash at the end of simulation as it was rendering. > That plot window crash took LTspice 24.0.12 down
By
Tony Casey
·
#158748
·
|
Re: LTspice 24.1 Simulation Errors
Hi Tony (and all), I have just uploaded the update on the 74LVC1G.lib here: /g/LTspice/files/Temp/74LVC1G.lib Kind regards, Herman
By
@HermanVos
·
#158747
·
|
Ltspice alternative for AD797
Hello , is there an alternative I could use for AD797 , LTspice model will be best. The model I got is very bad and its oscilating for no good reason. Thansk.
By
john23
·
#158746
·
|
Re: .MEAS Failure
Yes, I agree. Rather than assume such was true, I sought to prove that in my case there actually was no 2.0000000000 volts. Therefore the effect, however it may be accomplished, is to print the time
By
eewiz
·
#158745
·
|
Re: Monitor simulation percent completion from python
Interesting question. We're doing more or less the same and last week exactly the same question was raised. Is it possible to run another process which checks the content of the raw file which is
By
@HermanVos
·
#158744
·
|
Re: .MEAS Failure
I do not mean to stop asking a .MEAS find it.? It will, by interpolation between points.? But there will be no data point at 2.0000000 V.
By
Andy I
·
#158743
·
|
Re: .MEAS Failure
I think you miss the fact that there will be NO data point that simulated at 2.0000000000 volts.? Just won't happen.? Stop trying to find it. Andy
By
Andy I
·
#158742
·
|
Re: .MEAS Failure
Hello All: .options numdgt=15. caused the plot window to crash at the end of simulation as it was rendering. That plot window crash took LTspice 24.0.12 down with it. I will restart and try again. On
By
eewiz
·
#158741
·
|
Re: .MEAS Failure
Although that is true for voltages and currents, time values are always saved to the .raw file with double precision.? Time is special in that way. What probably happened here is that the Waveform
By
Andy I
·
#158740
·
|
Re: intuition behind a solution to crashing time domain simulation
#Time-step-too-small
Because settings such as those can sometimes help simulations run better.? That is the simple explanation. Cshunt and Gshunt add a bit of capacitance and conductance from every circuit node to
By
Andy I
·
#158739
·
|
Re: intuition behind a solution to crashing time domain simulation
#Time-step-too-small
There is nothing inconsistent about it.? You have misunderstood. "10f" always ALWAYS means 10 femto. "10F" always ALWAYS means 10 femto. It never ever means 10 Farads. Now, if you were to write "10
By
Andy I
·
#158738
·
|
Re: intuition behind a solution to crashing time domain simulation
#Time-step-too-small
We are. U1 is the integrator with C1 in its feedback path.? For DC, C1 is an open circuit so it is open-loop at DC. Wow.? You got quite different component markers than I did, from the same
By
Andy I
·
#158737
·
|
Re: intuition behind a solution to crashing time domain simulation
#Time-step-too-small
I say try it in a circuit. Yes, SPICE ignores case, but it doesn't ignore SPACES in this context. It ignores any character after the space. 10f is 10F is 10 femtofarads: 10 f is 10 F is 10 is 10
By
John Woodgate
·
#158736
·
|