¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date
Re: Whither 4053_tercio.asy
Sorry!? That was the other John W (Waugaman). Andy ( #DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2 )
By Andy I · #156946 ·
Re: Whither 4053_tercio.asy
I can live without them, and I'm sure Andy will provide all the help you need. -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software. www.avg.com
By John Woodgate · #156945 ·
Re: Whither 4053_tercio.asy
Thanks, Mike. I don't know if it matters (to John W), but your uploaded .zip file is missing the symbols "1To2.asy" and "switchana.asy". Andy
By Andy I · #156944 ·
Re: Whither 4053_tercio.asy
John & Andy, I found the files in my offline LTspice storage location. Files are uploaded as 4053_tercio.zip. I have no idea if the files are current with the latest Bordodynov library. You will
By Mike Fraser · #156943 ·
Re: Whither 4053_tercio.asy
A much older version of "SwitchAna.Lib" was also mentioned in this 2008 message thread: /g/LTspice/topic/50176653 ("X046 Lib & Cmos Switchs Libs") but it appears they did not
By Andy I · #156942 ·
Re: Whither 4053_tercio.asy
It's difficult to trace back in time, 7 years later.? But the library file "SwitchAna.Lib" was uploaded and mentioned in this thread: /g/LTspice/topic/50239806 ("Question about
By Andy I · #156941 ·
Whither 4053_tercio.asy
The analog switch library "SwitchAna.Lib" makes reference to various symbols (e.g.? "4053_tercio.asy") and phrases like "The model needs two params: Vcc & Vel see the circuit example..".? Where
By John Waugaman · #156940 ·
Re: OPA891 / OPA2891 Model Needed
Just to be clear - Adding "OPA891" as the Value2 attribute has nothing to do with putting your symbols and models in your user-defined locations. Andy
By Andy I · #156939 ·
Re: OPA891 / OPA2891 Model Needed
Problem solved: I added "OPA891" to Value 2 in both my OPA891 and OPA2891 symbols and now my sims all work using my user defined locations. Thanks to all who helped me figure this out. You spent
By info@... · #156938 ·
Re: LTspice 24.1 Beta Available Now
They can work on the bugs to their hearts content, but it might be reasonable to leave the link there so more people can continue the search.
By BRUCE108 · #156937 ·
Re: OPA891 / OPA2891 Model Needed
That is why I wrote this, in # 156924 ( /g/LTspice/message/156924 ) : I don't know how you missed it.? Put the symbol in a folder in your User-defined Symbol Search Path, and put the
By Andy I · #156936 ·
Re: OPA891 / OPA2891 Model Needed
It will nearly do that if you create your own libraries for symbols and models. See 'Settings > Search paths' in the Help. You do have to select the folder from a drop-down list. -- This email has
By John Woodgate · #156935 ·
Re: OPA891 / OPA2891 Model Needed
Tony and Andy, Thanks for the demo schematic which proves that the model itself is OK and that changing the line that defines the functions to match opamp2 works perfectly when the model is in the
By info@... · #156934 ·
Re: OPA891 / OPA2891 Model Needed
To save you the frustration of more wasted time, I have uploaded an OPA891 demo schematic </g/LTspice/files/Temp/OPA891_ATC_Demo.zip>, including a model suitably modified according to
By Tony Casey · #156933 ·
Re: OPA891 / OPA2891 Model Needed
There are multiple problems with that line, pointing to a few mistakes. The pin-order is all messed up.? It seems to have connected the input pins to net N002 and ground, the power pins to nets N003
By Andy I · #156931 ·
Re: OPA891 / OPA2891 Model Needed
It appears that the symbol is able to call the OPA891 spice model without problem. I edited the model to make the pins agree with the conventional symbols, but it won't run I used the TI model
By info@... · #156930 ·
Re: OPA891 / OPA2891 Model Needed
That is not new to Version 24.? I think it has been such ever since LTspice IV.? People who ignored the advice and tried adding their models in the wrong place, sometimes found that it did not
By Andy I · #156929 ·
Re: OPA891 / OPA2891 Model Needed
That has been the advice from here for many years prior to V24.
By Tony Casey · #156928 ·
Re: OPA891 / OPA2891 Model Needed
It's unwise to store your stuff in the LTspice 'working copies' of the native folders, that also? should never be touched. This is because your 'LTspice' becomes different from those of everyone
By John Woodgate · #156927 ·
Re: OPA891 / OPA2891 Model Needed
Since Version 24 came it appears that I am supposed to keep my user defined models in a different place than the factory models, However I have not yet made the switch from the file structure I had
By info@... · #156926 ·