Re: OPA891 / OPA2891 Model Needed
Very good advice. You can also, with advantage, do both; save in both locations, so that in 2027 you won't need to recall which? schematic directory the model is in. -- This email has been checked
By
John Woodgate
·
#156925
·
|
Re: OPA891 / OPA2891 Model Needed
Just in case it was not obvious already - Use LTspice's "opamp2" symbol with this model, after making the change to the model file. Change the name next to the symbol from "opamp2" to "OPA891". Also
By
Andy I
·
#156924
·
|
Re: OPA891 / OPA2891 Model Needed
Let us know if you encounter any problems with that model.? I did not try it yet. Andy
By
Andy I
·
#156923
·
|
Re: OPA891 / OPA2891 Model Needed
It is a SPICE model. TINA-TI can use either generic SPICE models, or models using their own format which only work in their program.? Fortunately, this one is a SPICE model.? ?In that respect,
By
Andy I
·
#156922
·
|
OPA891 / OPA2891 Model Needed
TI is publishing the OPA891 model only for their TINA program. I understand there is a procedure to extract the TINA model information and make a LTSpice-compatible model. I also understand that the
By
info@...
·
#156921
·
|
Re: RON vs Vds
I suppose that Rds depends on die temperature, too, so large signal Rds is a thicket, not a value. -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software. www.avg.com
By
John Woodgate
·
#156920
·
|
Re: RON vs Vds
Even in the FET's linear region, it is nonlinear.? It is unlikely that a JFET or MOSFET has an Rds that is actually linear, in the so-called linear region.? It "bends", even there. But if you found
By
Andy I
·
#156919
·
|
Re: RON vs Vds
Either one.? They would be the same.? (But unlikely.) Andy
By
Andy I
·
#156918
·
|
Re: RON vs Vds
What will be the expression for RON then?
By
abanindra.kumarmandal.ece24@...
·
#156917
·
|
Re: RON vs Vds
Not necessarily. If it is linear, then you know that the small-signal and large-signal definitions would be the same, so there would be no question. Andy
By
Andy I
·
#156916
·
|
Re: RON vs Vds
But RON is defined for linear region right?
By
abanindra.kumarmandal.ece24@...
·
#156915
·
|
Re: Separate from .CKT for .lib file
It's impossible to say anything about your files or models, without seeing them. But I will say that you probably can separate the photodiode part of the model from the amplifier part of the model.?
By
Andy I
·
#156914
·
|
Re: Separate from .CKT for .lib file
Anything is possible if you know what you are doing. Why not post your files by uploading them to the \Temp folder. That way we are in a better position to help you. Best method is to combine the into
By
BRUCE108
·
#156913
·
|
Separate from .CKT for .lib file
Hi I got a .CKT file and .lib file of photodiode and transimpedance amplifier. I know how to make spice model from these files. However, I want to separate transimpedance amplifier part from the .CKT
By
Mirza
·
#156912
·
|
Re: Placing a Symbol and its .cir "Manually" into a schematic
I finally saved a copy of the symbol in the local (¡°.¡±) folder, one of the two I now have access to. Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2024 2:29 PM To: [email protected] Subject: EXTERNAL: Re:
By
Bell, Dave
·
#156911
·
|
Re: LTspice 24.1 Beta Available Now
LTspice already supports environmental variables though the operating system calls it uses. Unfortunately, though, it doesn't
By
Tony Casey
·
#156910
·
|
Re: LTspice 24.1 Beta Available Now
Beta, Betta, Bettastill. -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software. www.avg.com
By
John Woodgate
·
#156909
·
|
Re: Placing a Symbol and its .cir "Manually" into a schematic
On 19/12/2024 22:29, Bell, Dave via groups.io wrote: > > Long explanation below, but here¡¯s what I am trying to do: > > In a local folder where all my personal LTspice projects and libs reside, I
By
Tony Casey
·
#156908
·
|
Re: LTspice 24.1 Beta Available Now
I think the Beta version was taken down a couple of weeks ago, probably while Analog Devices works out the bugs. I did not see any confirmation of that, but I think it is the most likely reason. I
By
Andy I
·
#156907
·
Edited
|
Re: RON vs Vds
You should use d(Vds)/d(Id) because it is a non-linear function. -- Regards, Tony
By
Tony Casey
·
#156906
·
|