¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date
Re: Warning: Multiple definitions of model ...
There are ways using social media to gain the attention of and action from recalcitrant companies. Anybody interested? Comments?
By Christopher Paul · #147322 ·
Re: Warning: Multiple definitions of model ...
Maybe there *is* a route to a true rand() function! Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2023 6:39 AM To: [email protected] Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [LTspice] Warning: Multiple definitions of model ... Dan wrote,
By Bell, Dave · #147321 ·
Re: Warning: Multiple definitions of model ...
Dan wrote, "The problem I had was, that when I opened the model again, it was off its specifications, and so was not stable for use." Are you saying that the model parameters didn't exist until you
By Andy I · #147320 ·
Re: PWL sources (was but not related to: "Discrete data points in plot view")
Christoph wrote that there was an error message "V4: requires a minimum of 5 parameters. Only 0 specified.", and asked, "Does anyone see the error?" No, we can't see the error, because you did not
Re: PWL sources (was but not related to: "Discrete data points in plot view")
Ok, my post above is a bit confused - it's showing what the times would evaluate to - to carry the point that the t_slew errors should not accumulate, the 32th bit will be at a time defined as
By Bonkers · #147318 ·
Re: Warning: Multiple definitions of model ...
This reminds me of a time when I designed a crystal filter model, based upon a file I found on the net. I tweeked it's bandwidth.? The problem I had was, that when I opened the model again, it was
By Dan · #147317 ·
Re: Warning: Multiple definitions of model ...
I use these same models but I delete the Russian devices, so I do not have to search over them.
By Dan · #147316 ·
Re: PWL sources (was but not related to: "Discrete data points in plot view")
Thanks to all. I was trying to follow the given recipes. But what I didn¡¯t like with the suggestion(s) thath the rise hold and fall times would all pile up and would end with a significant offset at
By Christoph · #147315 ·
Re: Warning: Multiple definitions of model ...
John said, "... about the Uncertainty Principle,... I am not sure..."? LOL. Tim
By Tim Hutcheson · #147314 ·
Entering {} under WineCX
I¡¯m running LTspiceXVII under macOS in a WineCX container. I find that entering {} | symbols which are reached by ALT-8, ALT-9 ALT-7 (german keyboard) is not possible. I can copy/paste the symbols
By Christoph · #147313 ·
Re: Warning: Multiple definitions of model ...
Yes, well, I have my own ideas about the Uncertainty Principle, but I am not sure whether they are right. Of course, you don't know if the cat is dead until you look, but that doesn't mean it wasn't
By John Woodgate · #147312 ·
Re: Warning: Multiple definitions of model ...
... that the cat remains both alive and dead until the state has been observed. Tim
By Tim Hutcheson · #147311 ·
Re: Warning: Multiple definitions of model ...
Hahaha!? I'd say that depends on which side of the argument you were on.? I think it may also date from before that in slightly different form as "care killed the cat".? Shakespeare is supposed to
By aburtonline@... · #147310 ·
Re: Warning: Multiple definitions of model ...
The first line dates from 1868. The second was added in 1912. It is not an improvement. ====================================================================================== Best wishes John Woodgate
By John Woodgate · #147308 ·
Re: Warning: Multiple definitions of model ...
If I may chip in here and finish the little ditty you started with the rarely known second line John: "Curiosity killed the cat, but satisfaction brought it back!"
By aburtonline@... · #147307 ·
Re: Warning: Multiple definitions of model ...
Some transistor models are very far from real behavior. Nobody checks that. What bothers me is that ADI violates the SPICE rule that model names must be unique. And nobody at ADI seems to care.
By Bernhard Weiskopf · #147306 ·
Re: Warning: Multiple definitions of model ...
very much appreciated this warning. A useful community service... ________________________________ Sent: Saturday, July 8, 2023 5:18 AM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [LTspice]
By Robin Gangopadhya <robin@...> · #147304 ·
Re: ISL70444SEH declaration issue?
Thank you for the explanation. Much appreciated.
By @sparky1111 · #147303 ·
Re: Warning: Multiple definitions of model ...
Perhaps it's as well I'm a bit of a dog, then. -- Regards, Tony
By Tony Casey · #147302 ·
Re: Warning: Multiple definitions of model ...
Yes, I did mean 'will'. My (limited) experience is that even different data books don't give the same graphical data, and models are no different in that respect.? Yes, you can tweak a model, but
By John Woodgate · #147301 ·