Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- LTspice
- Messages
Search
|
Re: SchBuilder.exe Windows10
#SchBuilder
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Aug 11, 2016, at 5:14 AM, 'John Woodgate' jmw1937@... [LTspice] <LTspice@...> wrote:
|
||
|
Re: SchBuilder.exe Windows10
#SchBuilder
Hi ,
Are you running it as administrator? W10 is picky about such things. Dave N From: LTspice@... [mailto:LTspice@...] Sent: 11 August 2016 12:26 To: LTspice@... Subject: [LTspice] Re: SchBuilder.exe Windows10 Hello John " Is there an option to set which folder to save to? " Yes, SchBuilder offers you to choose your directory. SchBuilder is installed in a private partition (not C:) and I try to save the built schematic in this partition. Regards PhB |
||
|
Re: SchBuilder.exe Windows10
#SchBuilder
John Woodgate
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýThat indicates an internal issue in SchBuilder.exe, probably about compatibility with Windows10. ? With best wishes DESIGN IT IN! OOO ¨C Own Opinions Only J M Woodgate and Associates Rayleigh England ? Sylvae in aeternum manent. ? From: LTspice@... [mailto:LTspice@...]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 12:26 PM To: LTspice@... Subject: [LTspice] Re: SchBuilder.exe Windows10 ? ? Hello John |
||
|
Re: SchBuilder.exe Windows10
#SchBuilder
Hello John
" Is there an option to set which folder to save to?? " Yes, SchBuilder offers you to choose your directory. SchBuilder is installed in a private partition (not C:) and I try to save the built schematic in this partition. Regards PhB |
||
|
Re: No XP?
Hello Helmut.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
LTpowerCAD II design only monolithic buck step-down regulators. SwcadIII design step-down and step-up regulators. Bordodynov. 11.08.2016, 13:30, "helmutsennewald@... [LTspice]" <ltspice@...>: Hello PhB |
||
|
Re: SchBuilder.exe Windows10
#SchBuilder
John Woodgate
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýIt looks as though the program tries to save in a Windows protected location. Is there an option to set which folder to save to? ? With best wishes DESIGN IT IN! OOO ¨C Own Opinions Only J M Woodgate and Associates Rayleigh England ? Sylvae in aeternum manent. ? From: LTspice@... [mailto:LTspice@...]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 12:03 PM To: LTspice@... Subject: [LTspice] SchBuilder.exe Windows10 ? ? Hello Analogspiceman ? |
||
|
SchBuilder.exe Windows10
#SchBuilder
Hello Analogspiceman
Did you (or somebody else) try to run schbuilder;exe under W10? When I run it , at the moment when I try to save the schematic I have apop windowwih: " Unable to create file " " Press OK to ignore and risk data corruption " " Please cancel to kill the program " I press OK but can't find the expected file anywhere. I can see a trace of the file : a shortcut to the expected file in %APPDATA%\Roaming\Micosoft\Windows Regards PhB |
||
|
Re: No XP?
Hello PhB
Bododynow talked about this version. ? I expect that not all jigs-examples from today will run with this old version of LTspice.? Similar and enhanced functions are now available with the program LTPowerCAD II.? One has to enter input and output voltage and current. The program will then list parts. It also includes an analysis tool creating a Bode plot for example. Best regards, Helmut
? |
||
|
Re: ....list
But I am pretty much certain that neither Helmut nor Mike has written aI think it's useful to add, once again, that Helmut is not affiliated, in any way, with Linear, or Mike, nor is it this group, for that matter. -- Vlad ______________________ ltspicegoodies.ltwiki.org -- holding, among others: a universal analog/digital filter, block-level models for power electronics (and not only), math blocks with a more stream-lined approach, some digital ADC, DAC, (synchronous-)counter, JKflop, etc. |
||
|
Re: No XP?
Hello PhB.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
The team was in SwcadIII menu. Activate this command was issued table (form) to enter the input voltage and load current. By entering the data you need and activated, you will get a table for the chip select. After selecting the chip, SWcadIII you create a scheme with all the values of the elements and start the simulation of the circuit. (The list of available chips of course not the same as now). SWcadIII (as LTspiceIV) are portable Original Program. Those. there is no need to install. I had a zip file. I unpacked it and ran SWcadIII. Bordodynov. 11.08.2016, 08:46, "basier.philippe@... [LTspice]" <ltspice@...>: Hello Bordodynov |
||
|
Re: No XP?
Hello Andy.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I am with you a little bit do not agree. Old SwcadIII had the opportunity to build the circuit on the input requirements for DC / DC. Recently, I studied my old files on CDs and found that version. For starters, the developers is a big help. Bordodynov. 10.08.2016, 20:31, "Andy ai.egrps@... [LTspice]" <ltspice@...>: andrew.lohmann?wrote: |
||
|
Re: Probing phase
Hello Steve
You wrote : "? With (2) and (3) LTspice points me to a problem that doesn¡¯t exist and not to where the problem does exist. " A/ You are wrong for case (2) [ mixed Qd44 and 2sc ]. There is Error on line 1137 : .endl 2sc6144sg B/ " It might well have been more obscure to identify had the 2SC6144SG sub circuit been one of many included via .inc statements. " Definitively not : If you create a file with the 2SC6144SG subcircuit ( say 2SC6144SG.sub ), even with the uncorrect command .endS , comment the subckt command lines inserted in the schematic and use .inc 2SC6144SG.sub? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ( and that's the right way to work? ) there is no problem in ALL configuration. Regards PhB |
||
|
Re: Probing phase
Hello Steve
You wrote : "? With (2) and (3) LTspice points me to a problem that doesn¡¯t exist and not to where the problem does exist. " A/ You are wrong for case (2) [ mixed Qd44 and 2sc ]. There is Error on line 1137 : .endl 2sc6144sg B/ " It might well have been more obscure to identify had the 2SC6144SG sub circuit been one of many included via .inc statements. " Definitively not : If you create a file with the 2SC6144SG subcircuit ( say 2SC6144SG.sub ), even with the uncorrect command .endS , comment the subckt command lines inserted in the schematic and use .inc 2SC6144SG.sub? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ( and that's the right way to work? ) there is no problem in ALL configuration. Regards PhB |
||
|
Re: Probing phase
Steve Kale
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýOk I see that in the log. ?But I don¡¯t get prompted with any error for which I must ¡°press ok to continue¡¡± which would lead me to look at the log in the first place.Fine¡ so (1) there¡¯s an error in the?2SC6144SG sub circuit from On Semi which raises log errors with respect to that sub circuit if all the Qd44vh10 pass transistors are replaced with?2SC6144SG. ?(2) If they are not, then LTspice tells me there¡¯s a missing Qd44vh10 model definition when indeed there isn¡¯t. ?(3) If all pass transistors are Qd44vh10 and the Spice directive in relation to the 2SC6144SG sub circuit is not ¡®commented out' in the schematic then LTspice tells me the model statement for Qd44vh10 is missing when it is not. (4) If all pass transistors are Qd44vh10 and the?2SC6144SG subcircuit statement is commented out of operation then all works just fine.? For (1) the problem is in the log but with no ¡®flag' that the log should be checked. ?With (2) and (3) LTspice points me to a problem that doesn¡¯t exist and not to where the problem does exist.? It took a lot of backtracking to identify that commenting out the?2SC6144SG sub circuit statement solved the problem. Of course then an examination of the material that needed to be commented out was readily done. It might well have been more obscure to identify had the?2SC6144SG sub circuit been one of many included via .inc statements. Better that LTspice actually alerts the user to the problem at hand rather than to an area which is just fine.? Let¡¯s perhaps end this sidebar regarding the?2SC6144SG sub circuit here. The issue is now fixed / no longer needed. I still have outstanding questions with respect to probing phase for which I would be very grateful of assistance.? Thanks in advance Steve EDIT: ?just saw John¡¯s post. ?The Qd44vh10 model is fine with respect to the device name / model name. ?The problem is with the 2SC816144SG sub circuit statement (with the .endl error noted by Philippe) and that LTspice points to an error with a missing Qd44vh10 model definition rather than an error with the 2SC816144SG sub circuit statement.?
|
||