开云体育

Mathias, It's supposed to always work for the vertical axis(except as you note for log scales), but it might not work for the horizontal axis because the simulation range might have changed. The .1fV

a) Storing/restoring of plot settings works for the x-axis but for the y-axis it does not restore (open Plot settings file) these settings. b) when using log scale for the y-axis the and you type in

Normally LTspice autoranges whenever you add or remove traces. You can toggle this on or off with the waveform window menu command Plot Settings=>Autoranging. If you want exactly the same plot

I got it: LtSpUtil.exe is the tool I need Sorry for bothering you BEFORE searching! Mathias -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Borcke Mathias (MP TI PT1 PRE4) Gesendet: Dienstag, 15. Juli 2003

This auto scale sometimes bothers me if I want to compare a simulation with one with slightly different parameters or component values. --> Is it possible to add a checkbutton to make this selectable?

Hello * is there a possibility to export data into some binary or ascii format? If not, Mike, can you add this to your code anytime in the future? eg: Xvalue1 Yvalue1 Xvalue2 Yvalue2 .... if there are

A nice dating site for singles from different races to gather, love is in the air! http://www.InterRacialMatch.com/i/15 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/special_lovers

... with more uploads coming soon.

An auto scale is performed after every simulation. It has nothing to do with the log display. You can save and load your plot settings by making the waveform window the active window and using the

Hello - first time in this forum, a small misbehaviour I have found in using the logscale for e.g. a dc sweep of a diode: Everytime we have made a new simulation we must adjust the lower bound of the

John, I enjoyed the constructive discussion. Steve. john_oztek <joconnor@...> wrote: Steve, The two (simplified) approaches are not exactly the same. The voltage sources do not provide

Steve, The two (simplified) approaches are not exactly the same. The voltage sources do not provide impedance isolation as the voltage controlled voltage source does. However, your point is well

Michael, Thank you very much for the report! The correction will be in update Version 2.03u. --Mike __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!

Hello Mike, there's a little typing mistake in the menu structure: Symbol Editor Edit->Attributes->Attribute Widow --- MAybe you can fix this with one of the next updates :-) Greetings from Germany

Alex, I thought you came up with an interesting solution. It certainly works fine in this particular case. I don't want to beat a dead horse, but this method often won't work. It would not be unusual

Mike, My interest in this whole loop gain simulation originated in my desire to characterize a 600 MHz oscillator. At that frequency, the highest input impedance is a finite complex impedance that

John, I finally thought about you idea a little more. It really is not different than inserting a series voltage source. The problem with this approach is that there is often not a high impedance

Thanks John, I'll take a look at your suggestion and report back!. If it works as you say, it sure's a lot simpler! Steve john_oztek <joconnor@...> wrote: Steve, As Mike pointed out, your

Dear Chaps, Why not try my method - for simulators only Version 4 SHEET 1 980 680 WIRE -352 112 -352 176 WIRE -352 176 -416 176 WIRE -352 176 -352 240 WIRE -416 176 -416 192 WIRE 160 144 32 144 WIRE

Steve, That's correct, except that my own experience is that it rarely comes up that I can't find an appropriate place to interject the signal. This is similar to the case in real life where you can