Negative Resistance
Mike and any other interested parties: I've noticed that most SPICE simulators allow the insertion of negative resistors and LTSpice seems to be no exception. However, when you do a Bode plot with an
By
Steve Steckler <leckerts@...>
·
#921
·
|
how do you model in SwitcherCAD?
I want to design and simulate schmeatics involving tubes. I have found several sites online that have available models to download. When i click on these models, i see a bunch of commands in a text
By
jamienoonan <jnoonan22@...>
·
#920
·
|
Re: Iteration problems
Mike, The schematic comes up without the opamp. I just put an LT1001 in. As you say, the ground is missing. When I wired one in everything worked fine. So, of course, you were correct. Regards, Steve
By
Steve Steckler <leckerts@...>
·
#919
·
|
Re: Iteration problems
I didn't see a ground symbol on your schematic. When I added it, and replaced your opamp with one in my library, it seems to run ok. Steve Bernhard_Kraemer@... wrote: Hello, I have a simple
By
Steve Steckler <leckerts@...>
·
#918
·
|
Re: Iteration problems
Hello Mike, Thank you, you have seen the problem. I'm sorry, next time I should check the ground node flag first. Thanks again, Bernhard
By
Bernhard Kraemer
·
#917
·
|
Re: Iteration problems
We can't run the circuit without the file TL071.lib, but one drafting error that can be seen is that you didn't specifiy what you meant as ground with the GND(node 0) flag. Press F4, select GND(global
By
Mike Engelhardt
·
#916
·
|
Iteration problems
Hello, I have a simple OpAmp-circuit to simulate. I would like to get a .AC - Simulation from 1Hz to 30Khz, but the simulator starts endless iterations. Depending on the Opamp-Modell I am using, the
By
Bernhard Kraemer
·
#915
·
|
Re: Not even ... (lame parameter stepping)
Oh, yes, now I see the problem. There was a problem introduced. If you add the line ".param R=5K" the circuit will fail but the line2 ".param" or ".param R=5K nix=3K" will not cause it to fail. There
By
Mike Engelhardt
·
#914
·
|
Re: Not even ... (lame parameter stepping)
Panama Mike, analog wrote: When param stepping suddenly went lame in circuit file at work where it used to run like a champ, the first thing I did was to make up a test circuit *almost* exactly like
By
analog spiceman
·
#913
·
|
Re: Not even limping, parameter stepping now lame and refuses to budge!
Analog, I didn't know that it was broken. There was recent change to make globally .step'ed parameters accessible in subcircuits if not defined at a more local scope, so maybe something else broke
By
Mike Engelhardt
·
#912
·
|
Spice Model for ST L2726
Hello- I'm looking for a spice model for an ST Microelectronics L2726 Dual Power Op Amp. Does anyone have one? Thanks John _________________________________________________________________ MSN 8 helps
By
JOHN RATHE <alfthedude@...>
·
#911
·
|
Not even limping, parameter stepping now lame and refuses to budge!
One of my favorite features is hobbled. :( :( Mike, please make it whole again. Version 2.03r June 30th. Thanks. PS: I noticed that LTspice parses ".aliases" and ".endalises" but doesn't seem to make
By
analog spiceman
·
#910
·
|
Re: Bug in "Help" files? (Re: Bug in "Waveform Arithmetic"?)
These functions are now available in the waveform compiler in version 2.03r. Thanks again for pointing out the problem. --Mike --- Dale <dchishol@...> wrote:
By
Mike Engelhardt
·
#909
·
|
Re: Bug in "Help" files? (Re: Bug in "Waveform Arithmetic"?)
It was error in the help file. Those functions were never part of the waveform expression compiler. But I'll add them. There's be an update next week that will include them for real waveform math so
By
Mike Engelhardt
·
#908
·
|
Bug in "Help" files? (Re: Bug in "Waveform Arithmetic"?)
I checked the "Help". On my installation (ver 2.03q, 27 Jun 2003) the topic called "Waveform Arithmetic" includes some sexy full-color screen captures and most definitely lists : " int(x) | convert x
By
Dale <dchishol@...>
·
#907
·
|
Re: Bug in "Waveform Arithmetic"?
--- In LTspice@..., "analogspiceman" <analogspiceman@y...> wrote: ... > The functions you named are not valid for waveform arithmetic and > may only be used in behavioral sources. Check
By
analog spiceman
·
#906
·
|
Re: Bug in "Waveform Arithmetic"?
you might try V(n003) analogspiceman <analogspiceman@...> wrote:--- In LTspice@..., "Dale" <dchishol@c...> wrote: Hello, The functions you named are not valid for waveform arithmetic
By
Steve Steckler <leckerts@...>
·
#905
·
|
Re: Bug in "Waveform Arithmetic"?
Hello, The functions you named are not valid for waveform arithmetic and may only be used in behavioral sources. Check the help file. Or better still, check my included crib sheet which contains many
By
analog spiceman
·
#904
·
|
Bug in "Waveform Arithmetic"?
When entering a waveform expression using the "int()", "ceil()" or "floor()" functions I get error messages that "int" (or "ceil" or "floor") is an undefined symbol. For the record, the expression I'm
By
Dale <dchishol@...>
·
#903
·
|
My suggestion: (Re: Tossed my bad cookies and am finally able to post here)
My preference would be to post in the "Files" section of this group. {In the menubar along the left side of this window, click on "Files" then drill down to Files>Lib>Sym, Files>Lib>Sub or
By
Dale <dchishol@...>
·
#902
·
|