Re: Dual Active bridge
Thank you, but we really want .ZIP archives, not 7z or any other sort.
By
John Woodgate
·
#160322
·
|
Re: Dual Active bridge
Hi All, i have uploaded a zip-file named DAB500_zip.7z, placed in the temp.-folder. You will find the following files: - Simulation file for the 500W DAB-Converter with same specifications as
By
Udo Huhn-Rohrbacher
·
#160321
·
|
Re: Simulation of MMC 3-Level on Ltspice
Bouzid.wis, See this schematic I uploaded: in the Temp folder. I swapped (interchanged) two of the signals.? Now it seems to work.? That confirms my suspicion that one of your sections was inverted
By
Andy I
·
#160320
·
|
Re: Passing a Mosfet Value as a parameter to a hierarchical subcircuit
On 08/05/2025 10:21, Tony Casey wrote: > The way to add your own MOSFET models to LTspice without changing the installation files is to paste them into ..\Documents\LTspice\user.mos. They then appear
By
Tony Casey
·
#160319
·
|
Re: Passing a Mosfet Value as a parameter to a hierarchical subcircuit
The way to add your own MOSFET models to LTspice without changing the installation files is to paste them into ..\Documents\LTspice\user.mos. They then appear in the "Pick New MOSFET" list. The
By
Tony Casey
·
#160318
·
|
Re: Passing a Mosfet Value as a parameter to a hierarchical subcircuit
Don't even think abut trying to do that. It would make your version of LTspice unique, even if you could do it. Instead, make your own library files for such devices, i.e. My MOSFETS etc. -- This
By
John Woodgate
·
#160317
·
|
Re: Passing a Mosfet Value as a parameter to a hierarchical subcircuit
Yes/Nope.... They are the LTSpice provided "Pick one of These".? I have not yet ventured into other models as provided by manufacturers. I'm not even sure I want to and if I did I would go mad and
By
Per
·
#160316
·
|
Re: Passing a Mosfet Value as a parameter to a hierarchical subcircuit
That is not quite what I meant. When you open the model for each MOSFET, and look at its contents, does it look like this? Or does it look like this? If you are using only the MOSFETs that come with
By
Andy I
·
#160315
·
|
Re: Passing a Mosfet Value as a parameter to a hierarchical subcircuit
Curly braces are needed here in order to avoid an ambiguity. Because you might also have .model MOS ...
By
Mathias Born
·
#160314
·
|
Re: Passing a Mosfet Value as a parameter to a hierarchical subcircuit
Oh. The transistor models are just the normal 3 Pin nmos devices. MN M1 With Value set to {MOS} and using a name from the list you get when you "Pick New Mosfet" Overall the idea (need) is to reuse
By
Per
·
#160313
·
|
Re: Passing a Mosfet Value as a parameter to a hierarchical subcircuit
Face Palm... Sorry. I finaly twigged it having found the help. Doh. For anyone else text is passed by enclosing in inverted thingies. In a subcircuit pop up on the .PARAMS box write something like
By
Per
·
#160312
·
|
Re: Passing a Mosfet Value as a parameter to a hierarchical subcircuit
Per, what kind of transistor models are you using, and trying to pass into a subcircuit? Are they .MODEL models?? Or are they defined by a block of netlist lines surrounded by .SUBCKT ... .ENDS? Andy
By
Andy I
·
#160311
·
|
Re: Passing a Mosfet Value as a parameter to a hierarchical subcircuit
OK I'm still flummoxed... "Not quite. LTspice also knows string parameters, which were introduced extactly for the purpose discussed here." Mathias. Can you give an example?
By
Per
·
#160310
·
|
Re: Calculate average value of a waveform under specific conditions using .meas command
Hello Andy and Tony, What you have mentioned is correct. Accuracy and precision are needed. And I checked the derivative option too. Due to ringing during DCM the derivative makes the situation
By
ankitk.ace@...
·
#160309
·
|
Re: Dual Active bridge
Yes.? LTspice calculates the Average and RMS values over the displayed plot only.? Right-click on the X-axis and change the Left: value to something after the waveforms have stabilized.? Then use
By
Andy I
·
#160308
·
|
Re: Dual Active bridge
Switching to the Alternate solver in LTspice 24.1.8 allows the simulation to run successfully without stalls. I also changed the simulation command to ".tran 0 5m 2m" eliminate the uic and skip past
By
Dennis
·
#160307
·
|
Re: Dual Active bridge
No.? But I get hundreds of "Heightened Def Com" warnings, without the 1 ohm series resistor.? With it, those warnings disappear. Andy
By
Andy I
·
#160306
·
|
Re: Dual Active bridge
Yes, my 8A/16A figures were what I saw without expanding the waveform. Using CTRL-left click, I see 5.9124 A, but that includes the inrush current at t=0+. Is there any way to change the 'Interval
By
John Woodgate
·
#160305
·
|
Re: Dual Active bridge
I entirely agree. I may be doing something wrong, but I can't see what. Do you get a very long series of entries in the expanded netlist about relaxing tolerances to seek convergence?? That occurs
By
John Woodgate
·
#160304
·
|
Re: Dual Active bridge
After adding Rser=1 ohm to V9: The average current from V9 is 5.858 Amps, compared to the 8 Amps you said yours had.? Our simulations should not have differed by more than 2 Amps!? Something is
By
Andy I
·
#160303
·
|