¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Re: Simulation of MMC 3-Level on Ltspice
Bouzid.wis, I am having trouble trying to understand how this circuit works. In the upper submodule, it seems like M1 can not do much, because C1 would charge and then not pass any more current, so
By Andy I · #160290 ·
Re: Dual Active bridge
Using computer #1 today, so it is lowly LTspice XVII.? Not LTspice 24. You night have been hit by a yet-to-be-fixed bug - er, I mean side effect they added in version 24.1.x. Andy
By Andy I · #160289 ·
Re: Dual Active bridge
That is a somewhat difficult question for me to answer.? Maybe others can speak to this better than I can. But I think the answer is "yes", I think it is normal. Because the waveforms are not
By Andy I · #160288 ·
Re: Dual Active bridge
I think that problem goes away if you get rid of the UIC.? There is no need for UIC here.? Don't use it unless it is needed.? Change: .tran 0 100m 0 uic to: .tran 0 100m 0 or: .tran 100m or even
By Andy I · #160287 ·
Re: Dual Active bridge
It should not be much larger than output current x output voltage/input voltage. That is, power out/input voltage. But I already told you that there is a very large inrush current because of the large
By John Woodgate · #160286 ·
Re: Simulation of MMC 3-Level on Ltspice
I don't know if this matters in your simulation, but you have started with much less than a sine wave.? 9 ms is less than one-half cycle of 50 Hz.? The output waveform does not seem right, however.
By Andy I · #160285 ·
Re: Simulation of MMC 3-Level on Ltspice
Remember to use English only in this group. Translation:? "I have uploaded the ltspice file under the name M2C single-phase SPWM112 to Temp" Note:? The actual filename is "M2C single phase
By Andy I · #160284 ·
Re: 90nm CMOS technology
That is true, and it's something I often remind people about. Sure you could grab some random "90nm" model file and play around with it, but don't use it to model any actual circuits that you plan on
By Andy I · #160282 ·
Re: 90nm CMOS technology
To be clear, Andy has found some *contributed* information, which is 5 years old. LTspice itself has no data on fabrication technology. My advice still stands; contact the foundry.
By John Woodgate · #160281 ·
Re: Dual Active bridge
Good to know. As it must. How much is "too much"? So therefore it provides less than 500 W to the load, right? But some of that current into the primary represents reactive power, not rea
By Andy I · #160280 ·
Re: 90nm CMOS technology
You get that from the foundry you plan to use to make your device. LTspice doesn't have that information. -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software. www.avg.com
By John Woodgate · #160278 ·
Re: 90nm CMOS technology
They have been discussed here a number of times, including these: /g/LTspice/files/z_yahoo/Files%20sorted%20by%20message%20number/msg_21060
By Andy I · #160276 ·
Re: Dual Active bridge
What version allowed the sim to run without stalling? I am now using 24.1.8, and the sim stalls after a different number of microseconds , depending on which tweak I have made to the .ASC.? I don't
By John Woodgate · #160275 ·
90nm CMOS technology
Hello guys, Does anyone has 90nm CMOS technology text file or link something like that. Absolutely for LTspice.
By Tsukuyo · #160274 ·
Re: Dual Active bridge
My simulation did not stall.? It is somewhat slow and I did not wait 100ms for it to finish, but it never stalled.? That might be because of different Control Panel settings, or it might be because
Re: Dual Active bridge
Your messages are somewhat confusing. Of course the inductances should be in uH (micro Henrys), not us (micro seconds), but we get the idea.? I may not understand what you meant by "steady".? I'm
Re: Passing a Mosfet Value as a parameter to a hierarchical subcircuit
Ooops. Still not having it. I shall sleep on things and try again tomorrow.
By Per · #160271 ·
Re: Passing a Mosfet Value as a parameter to a hierarchical subcircuit
Apologies for setting things off and thanks for the additional replies. I upgraded to 24.1.8 and now it is working. I did have {MOS} set as the mosfet type for M1 and M2 in my subcircuit so it just
By Per · #160270 ·
Re: Simulation of MMC 3-Level on Ltspice
Ich habe die ltspice-Datei unter dem Namen M2C single-phase SPWM112 auf Temp hochgeladen
By Bouzid.wis@... · #160269 ·
Re: Dual Active bridge
Alright, Anyone else who can help
By arhamishtiaq42@... · #160268 ·