¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date
Re: .STEPping a .WAVE file output
Version 24.1.6 is not out yet.? Promised for sometime soon, very soon.
By Andy I · #159343 ·
Re: .STEPping a .WAVE file output
Oops, I found the ".step + ,wave" method only works in LTspice XVII, not supported in LTspice V24.1.5. > > > In V24.1.5 I , it only creates a file named "{stp}". Best reards.
By ericsson.sunshine@... · #159342 ·
Re: .STEPping a .WAVE file output
Hi, : I have tested the following methods, plus the *.bat running under Windows OS. " .step param stp 1 6 1 .param fs {stp*1k} .wave {stp} 16 44.1k V(out) " --> it generates the file 1, 2,...,6 Then
By ericsson.sunshine@... · #159341 ·
Re: Singular matrix
Some of the things you can try (no guarantees!) include: * Remove voltage sources and replace with "Nortonized" (current) sources. * Add a small GSHUNT, perhaps 1e-12 to as much as 1e-10. * Add a
By Andy I · #159340 ·
Re: .STEPping a .WAVE file output
NICE! Sent: Monday, March 24, 2025 10:39 AM To: [email protected] Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [LTspice] .STEPping a .WAVE file output Hi, Since this seems like a nice feature, I extended the grammar.
By Bell, Dave · #159339 ·
Re: Singular matrix
There are indeed infinitely many reasons for that error. We can't help much unless you let us see more of what you are doing. Upload your .ASC file AND all the other files required to run the
By John Woodgate · #159338 ·
Singular matrix
Hello everybody, I'm working on a schematic and encounter a "singular matrix" error. I know there are as many cause than people in the mankind, but I would like to have advices to avoid this sort of
By pilou@... · #159337 ·
Re: .STEPping a .WAVE file output
Hi, Since this seems like a nice feature, I extended the grammar. Starting with LTspice 24.1.6, you can just say: .wave {Stp+".wav"} 16 44.1k V(Out) Best Regards, Mathias
By Mathias Born · #159336 ·
Re: .STEPping a .WAVE file output
T does work, as you suggested, with *just* the number as filenemae. OK for a few files to rename, like this, but if I wanted to make a lot of runs, it would be a pain. Thanks, Dave Sent: Monday, March
By Bell, Dave · #159335 ·
Re: LTspice AKO
View the extended netlist.?view the netlist and right click on the netlist and select "generate expanded listing". Yahoo Mail: Search, Organize, Conquer
By Richard Andrews · #159334 ·
Re: .STEPping a .WAVE file output
Maybe it's the negative values?? (Clearly, guessing here.)
By Andy I · #159333 ·
Re: .STEPping a .WAVE file output
The failing stoi function expects an integer during parsing. Maybe 44.1k should be 44100 ? Or the file contains non-integer values where a integers are 'required' (expected). Arie
By Arie de Muijnck · #159332 ·
Re: .STEPping a .WAVE file output
Well, that is a very significant error message, isn't it? Thank you for sharing.(;-) -- OOO - Own Opinions only If something is true: * as far
By John Woodgate · #159331 ·
Re: .STEPping a .WAVE file output
I haven¡¯t tried that, Andy, will do. Running XVII ¡°A C++ exception with the message: ¡®invalid .stoi argument was thrown during simulation, which indicates a bug in LTspice. Please report this
By Bell, Dave · #159330 ·
Re: .STEPping a .WAVE file output
Exactly what error message do you get? -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software. www.avg.com
By John Woodgate · #159329 ·
Re: .STEPping a .WAVE file output
It might depend on your LTspice version.? What's yours? Did you try ".wave {stp} 16 ..."?? That is, remove the ".wav" extension from that command.? Then add it manually, in Windows. What error
By Andy I · #159328 ·
.STEPping a .WAVE file output
I want make multiple runs of a model which will output a waveform to a .wav file. Each run will step a parameter, all of which works as intended, except, I need to change the filename each time. This
By Bell, Dave · #159327 ·
Re: LTspice AKO
Unfortunately, in this specific case it is screwed up. It's a bug that will be fixed in 24.1.6 (coming this week). Best Regards, Mathias
By Mathias Born · #159326 ·
Re: LTspice AKO
To clear, V24.1.x didn't screw up the AKO feature, as such - it still worked. The actual problem was with the model name not being recognised when AKO was being used with the resulting numeric "name"
By Tony Casey · #159325 ·
Re: LTspice AKO
I had already checked that it does work even when an error is reported. 24.1.4 gave the same current as 24.0.12 in a .OP analysis, even when it reported the error. I doubled-checked by changing one of
By Tony Casey · #159324 ·