开云体育

Like John, I am confused what your circuit is doing.? You talked about a battery, but I don't see one.? Does one of the capacitors represent the battery? You mentioned using capacitors to "limit the

You have a 24 V 16 MHz battery? Wow! You didn't read the instructions about uploading. Uploads of circuits go into Files => Temp.? Your question is also off-topic, because it is about design, not

All changes you make to the colours stay until you change them again. Colours and Hotkey settings are stored in LTspice.ini. You could always make a backup of this file in case it ever gets

Changes you make to colours through Control Panel are permanent until you make a major upgrade. Not all upgrades seem to revert colours to default.

I dislike the standard colors in LTSpice. all blue, e.g. is hardly legible over dark background. I adjusted a scheme that seems pleasant to me. Can I make this my permanent color scheme? -- Christoph

By no means unnecessary. I may well be asked about such features in the spectrum. Thank you very much. Your pulse has defined rise and fall times. I suppose my (over-complicated) PWL transitions also

rodv92, Do you have access to another PC where you can test the same download of LTspice v17.1.9? Do you have a simpler schematic with just one or two inductors to test this with? What is the "strange

John asked, " What do you mean by 'push harder'? " The short answer is to force the FFT to sample the waveform with many more timepoints.? That makes it slower but potentially more accurate. The

I haven't tried this one, but I ran my MCC with REPEAT FOREVER ... ENDREPEAT for 12 s and it took less time than I could notice. Of course, I wasn't using a .TXT file, which would need to be accessed

I suspect this is a function of CPU, disk, perhaps memory, and possibly LTspice/OS version. My figures were: 1m:??? ??? 0.187s 10m:??? ? 1.325s 100m:??? 12.8s 1:??? ??? ??? 126s

Thanks for the REPEAT FOREVER experiment. I repaired the algorithm now and took into account the trise/tfall times in the 100% duty cycle case. Possibly i will dispense with the REPEAT option for the

FYI -- For me, it still hangs (or takes a VERY long time) when I include the REPEAT FOREVER ... ENDREPEAT around the PWL file.? I do not have experience with that particular format, so I can't tell

Thanks, indeed, that's the point. I have to do an iteration step in my script. -- Christoph

Anirban asked about finding Triac models. There are several Triac models already in the group's Files.? Finding them might be a challenge, because it's best to search for a part number, rather than

Excuses. I forgot to disable my message signing when posting the corresponding message. ANd the term from LTSPICE's view is PWL; of course. But I'm thinking in "PWM" at the moment since the data form

Anirban, Never "hijack" another message thread, the way you just did. If you have a new topic to send, send it as a NEW MESSAGE with a NEW SUBJECT line.? If you post from the group's website, click

Can any one help me with adding a Triac model in my schematic? I am trying to simulate with ST?AC Switch but couldn't find a spice model for such. Any idea where can I? I am also open with LittleFuse

Christoph uploaded another file (PWM_less_pulses.zip) but forgot to send a message about it.? The description with Christoph's newer file is: "Still don't find the culprit. It fails on last line.

MCC = Multi-Cycle Control, but also Marylebone Cricket Club, the headquarters of English cricket.

That's how multilevel converters allow for lower switching losses & EMI to divide down V steps to suppress EMI. Sign waves allow higher PF, but if not AC 60 hz line based then not as helpful. Since a