Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- LTspice
- Messages
Search
|
SchBuilder.exe Windows10
#SchBuilder
Hello Analogspiceman
Did you (or somebody else) try to run schbuilder;exe under W10? When I run it , at the moment when I try to save the schematic I have apop windowwih: " Unable to create file " " Press OK to ignore and risk data corruption " " Please cancel to kill the program " I press OK but can't find the expected file anywhere. I can see a trace of the file : a shortcut to the expected file in %APPDATA%\Roaming\Micosoft\Windows Regards PhB |
||
|
Re: No XP?
Hello PhB
Bododynow talked about this version. ? I expect that not all jigs-examples from today will run with this old version of LTspice.? Similar and enhanced functions are now available with the program LTPowerCAD II.? One has to enter input and output voltage and current. The program will then list parts. It also includes an analysis tool creating a Bode plot for example. Best regards, Helmut
? |
||
|
Re: ....list
But I am pretty much certain that neither Helmut nor Mike has written aI think it's useful to add, once again, that Helmut is not affiliated, in any way, with Linear, or Mike, nor is it this group, for that matter. -- Vlad ______________________ ltspicegoodies.ltwiki.org -- holding, among others: a universal analog/digital filter, block-level models for power electronics (and not only), math blocks with a more stream-lined approach, some digital ADC, DAC, (synchronous-)counter, JKflop, etc. |
||
|
Re: No XP?
Hello PhB.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
The team was in SwcadIII menu. Activate this command was issued table (form) to enter the input voltage and load current. By entering the data you need and activated, you will get a table for the chip select. After selecting the chip, SWcadIII you create a scheme with all the values of the elements and start the simulation of the circuit. (The list of available chips of course not the same as now). SWcadIII (as LTspiceIV) are portable Original Program. Those. there is no need to install. I had a zip file. I unpacked it and ran SWcadIII. Bordodynov. 11.08.2016, 08:46, "basier.philippe@... [LTspice]" <ltspice@...>: Hello Bordodynov |
||
|
Re: No XP?
Hello Andy.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I am with you a little bit do not agree. Old SwcadIII had the opportunity to build the circuit on the input requirements for DC / DC. Recently, I studied my old files on CDs and found that version. For starters, the developers is a big help. Bordodynov. 10.08.2016, 20:31, "Andy ai.egrps@... [LTspice]" <ltspice@...>: andrew.lohmann?wrote: |
||
|
Re: Probing phase
Hello Steve
You wrote : "? With (2) and (3) LTspice points me to a problem that doesn¡¯t exist and not to where the problem does exist. " A/ You are wrong for case (2) [ mixed Qd44 and 2sc ]. There is Error on line 1137 : .endl 2sc6144sg B/ " It might well have been more obscure to identify had the 2SC6144SG sub circuit been one of many included via .inc statements. " Definitively not : If you create a file with the 2SC6144SG subcircuit ( say 2SC6144SG.sub ), even with the uncorrect command .endS , comment the subckt command lines inserted in the schematic and use .inc 2SC6144SG.sub? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ( and that's the right way to work? ) there is no problem in ALL configuration. Regards PhB |
||
|
Re: Probing phase
Hello Steve
You wrote : "? With (2) and (3) LTspice points me to a problem that doesn¡¯t exist and not to where the problem does exist. " A/ You are wrong for case (2) [ mixed Qd44 and 2sc ]. There is Error on line 1137 : .endl 2sc6144sg B/ " It might well have been more obscure to identify had the 2SC6144SG sub circuit been one of many included via .inc statements. " Definitively not : If you create a file with the 2SC6144SG subcircuit ( say 2SC6144SG.sub ), even with the uncorrect command .endS , comment the subckt command lines inserted in the schematic and use .inc 2SC6144SG.sub? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ( and that's the right way to work? ) there is no problem in ALL configuration. Regards PhB |
||
|
Re: Probing phase
Steve Kale
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýOk I see that in the log. ?But I don¡¯t get prompted with any error for which I must ¡°press ok to continue¡¡± which would lead me to look at the log in the first place.Fine¡ so (1) there¡¯s an error in the?2SC6144SG sub circuit from On Semi which raises log errors with respect to that sub circuit if all the Qd44vh10 pass transistors are replaced with?2SC6144SG. ?(2) If they are not, then LTspice tells me there¡¯s a missing Qd44vh10 model definition when indeed there isn¡¯t. ?(3) If all pass transistors are Qd44vh10 and the Spice directive in relation to the 2SC6144SG sub circuit is not ¡®commented out' in the schematic then LTspice tells me the model statement for Qd44vh10 is missing when it is not. (4) If all pass transistors are Qd44vh10 and the?2SC6144SG subcircuit statement is commented out of operation then all works just fine.? For (1) the problem is in the log but with no ¡®flag' that the log should be checked. ?With (2) and (3) LTspice points me to a problem that doesn¡¯t exist and not to where the problem does exist.? It took a lot of backtracking to identify that commenting out the?2SC6144SG sub circuit statement solved the problem. Of course then an examination of the material that needed to be commented out was readily done. It might well have been more obscure to identify had the?2SC6144SG sub circuit been one of many included via .inc statements. Better that LTspice actually alerts the user to the problem at hand rather than to an area which is just fine.? Let¡¯s perhaps end this sidebar regarding the?2SC6144SG sub circuit here. The issue is now fixed / no longer needed. I still have outstanding questions with respect to probing phase for which I would be very grateful of assistance.? Thanks in advance Steve EDIT: ?just saw John¡¯s post. ?The Qd44vh10 model is fine with respect to the device name / model name. ?The problem is with the 2SC816144SG sub circuit statement (with the .endl error noted by Philippe) and that LTspice points to an error with a missing Qd44vh10 model definition rather than an error with the 2SC816144SG sub circuit statement.?
|
||
|
Re: Probing phase
Hello
With all Qd44vh10 replaced If I replace .endL? by .ends I get no error or warning. If I keep .endL I get : Error on line 1138 : .endl 2sc6144sg ??? ?Unknown control card Error on line 1138 : .endl 2sc6144sg ??? ?Unknown control card Error on line 1138 : .endl 2sc6144sg ??? ?Unknown control card Error on line 1138 : .endl 2sc6144sg ??? ?Unknown control card Error on line 1138 : .endl 2sc6144sg ??? ?Unknown control card Error on line 1138 : .endl 2sc6144sg ??? ?Unknown control card Regards PhB |
||
|
Re: Probing phase
John Woodgate
It looks very much as though your model isn't called *exactly* ' Qd44vh10'. There could be a leading or trailing space or another invisible character. Have you ever uploaded the model?
With best wishes DESIGN IT IN! OOO ¨C Own Opinions Only <> www.jmwa.demon.co.uk J M Woodgate and Associates Rayleigh England Sylvae in aeternum manent. From: LTspice@... [mailto:LTspice@...] Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 7:44 PM To: LTspice@... Subject: Re: [LTspice] Probing phase Philippe Replace all 6 of the Qd44vh10 with 2SC6144SG and tell me if you get an error. I get none. If one Qd44vh10 remains then yes I get an error. Regards Steve On 10 Aug 2016, at 17:37, basier.philippe@... <mailto:basier.philippe@...> [LTspice] <LTspice@... <mailto:LTspice@...> > wrote: Hello Steve "If there is any instance of Q44dvh10, then LTspice tells me I have a problem with the lack of a model statement for Q44dvh10 - even though I clearly have one. LTspice does not ever tell me there¡¯s a problem with the 2SC6144SG .subckt Spice directive - not when I have an active instance of the device in the circuit nor when I do. " If I replace Q33 by an instance of 2SC6144SG I have : a pop window at the end of the run with: Error on line 101 : q13 n053 n062 vout-darlpp 0 qd44vh10 Unable to find definition of model "qd44vh10" Error on line 133 : q18 n092 n102 vout-darl 0 qd44vh10 Unable to find definition of model "qd44vh10" Error on line 199 : q27 n123 n131 vout-darlpp2 0 qd44vh10 Unable to find definition of model "qd44vh10" Error on line 1137 : .endl 2sc6144sg Unknown control card Error on line 273 : q38 n095 n103 vout-darl-stab 0 qd44vh10 Unable to find definition of model "qd44vh10" Error on line 315 : q41 n126 n134 vout-darlpp2-stab 0 qd44vh10 Unable to find definition of model "qd44vh10" Note Error on line 1137 : .endl 2sc6144sg Unknown control card You can see the same thing in the log file. If I replace all Dq44dvh10 by 2SC6144SG I have : Error on line 1138 : .endl 2sc6144sg Unknown control card Error on line 1138 : .endl 2sc6144sg Unknown control card Error on line 1138 : .endl 2sc6144sg Unknown control card Error on line 1138 : .endl 2sc6144sg Unknown control card Error on line 1138 : .endl 2sc6144sg Unknown control card Error on line 1138 : .endl 2sc6144sg Unknown control card Regards PhB |
||
|
Re: Probing phase
Steve Kale
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýPhilippeReplace all 6 of the Qd44vh10 with 2SC6144SG and tell me if you get an error. ?I get none. ?If one Qd44vh10 remains then yes I get an error. Regards Steve
|
||