Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- LTspice
- Messages
Search
Re: Pull-Push transformer for valve amp in LTspice
John Woodgate
In message <CALFKJk5yokRyVCrWd5VAgEppt-AGJ7Wy6+mx5utH+s0T8JX7_A@...>, dated Wed, 21 May 2014, "Vlad imbvlad@... [LTspice]" <LTspice@...> writes:
It's not only you, by any means. Transformers come up here quite often, and I always try to respond because it's clear that many do not understand them. But just like 'Upload to Files => Temp' doesn't seem to register, neither does the transformer 'lore'. What you may be dimly recalling is something about having two generators feeding two separate windings. It MAY be OK if the numbers are right, but it MAY produce huge currents. For example, suppose there are two identical windings and 10 V is applied to one. 10 V will appear across the other one, too. Now connect a 100 V source to that second winding as well, and watch the pretty smoke. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Nondum ex silvis sumus John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK |
Re: Pull-Push transformer for valve amp in LTspice
>??I'm really surprised > at the responses that show considerable uncertainty. Guilty, what can I say, but I really can't escape the feeling there was a topic somewhere about some impossibility of having two primaries in a transformer. Maybe there are some crossed neurons somewhere. If so, I'd rather have that checked after I'm gone. Vlad ______________________ -- holding, among others: a universal analog/digital filter, block-level models for power electronics (and not only), math blocks with a more stream-lined approach, some digital ADC, DAC, (synchronous-)counter, JKflop, etc. |
Re: Pull-Push transformer for valve amp in LTspice
John Woodgate
In message <lli8ok+1jht4cj@...>, dated Wed, 21 May 2014,
"pha0001@... [LTspice]" <LTspice@...> writes: Rather than point you to things to copy, I'll show you how to design. Please post to Files-Temp, not anywhere else unless advised. You have made the astonishingly common mistake of expecting transformers with microhenry inductors to work at audio or mains frequencies. The inductances need to be LARGE; their impedances need to be around 10 times the associated circuit impedances. For example, your secondary winding is 314 MICROhms at 50 Hz and the load is 8 ohms. We start with the 6.7 k a-a impedance. That is what the 8 ohms has to look like when 'seen' through the transformer. 6700/8 = 837.5 and the turns ratio of the transformer is the square root of that, i.e. 29. Now the inductance of the primary needs to be high compared with the 6.7 k at the lowest frequency you are interested in. I'll assume 20 Hz, since I don't have to buy the transformer and find room for it, but I'll use a factor of 5 for 'high'. The inductance L = 6700/(2pi*20) = 267 H. The secondary inductance is 267/837.5 = 319 millihenrys. To model in LTspice, you make the primary of two identical inductors, each a QUARTER of the total inductance and set k=1. I'm really surprised at the responses that show considerable uncertainty. Now if you were going to make the transformer you would have to consider the power to be handled and from that choose a core size and material. But I don't suppose you want to go that far. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Nondum ex silvis sumus John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK |
Re: Pull-Push transformer for valve amp in LTspice
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýI believe you see why I prefer the multiple winding solution. Having to open the model with a text editor and reloading it in the .asc file is not my idea of immediacy.Le 21/05/2014 15:59, Vlad
imbvlad@... [LTspice] a ¨¦crit?:
? |
Re: Pull-Push transformer for valve amp in LTspice
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýThe problem with multiple primaries is that it may create conflictss if two sources are too strongly coupled.Indeed, when using multiple primaries, one must make sure the voltages, phases and source resistance vs. parasitic resistance are sensible. I think some transformer sub-circuits don't accept the notion of more than one excitation winding. Le 21/05/2014 15:54, Vlad
imbvlad@... [LTspice] a ¨¦crit?:
? |
Re: Pull-Push transformer for valve amp in LTspice
> To my great shame I must admit I haven't been able to edit the OT values in the Fender schemo. Using the "Fender Twin Reverb" example, the output transformer is modeled in the model file "transPPb.INC". Any text editor should do. I also see extra nodes/elements for parasitic resistances & co. instead of using the builtin Rser/Rpar/etc, but maybe it's intentional, for the purpose of showing. Vlad ______________________ -- holding, among others: a universal analog/digital filter, block-level models for power electronics (and not only), math blocks with a more stream-lined approach, some digital ADC, DAC, (synchronous-)counter, JKflop, etc. |
Re: Pull-Push transformer for valve amp in LTspice
> Indeed a dual primary xfmr can be created in LTspice. Well, I just tried it and you're right, it does work, but I know there was a discussion some time ago (years, probably) about not being able to make a more than one primary transformer in LTspice. Maybe with the Chan core? I really can't remember now. Vlad ______________________ -- holding, among others: a universal analog/digital filter, block-level models for power electronics (and not only), math blocks with a more stream-lined approach, some digital ADC, DAC, (synchronous-)counter, JKflop, etc. |
Re: Pull-Push transformer for valve amp in LTspice
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýIn fact all these examples use a sub-circuit instead of coupled inductors, but I know that coupled inductors work and are IMO easier to edit.To my great shame I must admit I haven't been able to edit the OT values in the Fender schemo. Le 21/05/2014 15:41, Jerry Lee Marcel
jerryleemarcel@... [LTspice] a ¨¦crit?:
? |
Re: Pull-Push transformer for valve amp in LTspice
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýIndeed a dual primary xfmr can be created in LTspice.You need to include all windings in the K statement. There is a beautiful example of tube amp in the Files, in fact more than one: Fender Twin Reverb AB763 and Fender Twin Reverb AA270 Also Fisher500c and Laney_Marshall_EL34_50Watt Le 21/05/2014 15:32, Vlad
imbvlad@... [LTspice] a ¨¦crit?:
? |
Re: Pull-Push transformer for valve amp in LTspice
I don't know if it's possible to simulate a double-primary transformer in LTspice. At least not with inductors and coupling between them. Still, if others have different answers, it would be useful to follow the steps in the group's home page about asking for help, how to upload schematics and where. Vlad ______________________ -- holding, among others: a universal analog/digital filter, block-level models for power electronics (and not only), math blocks with a more stream-lined approach, some digital ADC, DAC, (synchronous-)counter, JKflop, etc. |
Pull-Push transformer for valve amp in LTspice
I am having trouble modelling an ideal Pull-Push center tap 8 ohms transformer with a 6.7k primary anode-anode impedance in LTspice.? |
Re: Regarding LT1521-5
John Woodgate
In message <F95E7D51-CF12-459A-9C1E-8E9BFD35813C@...>, dated
Wed, 21 May 2014, "Mark Gurries gurriesm@... [LTspice]" <LTspice@...> writes: I explained this to him on March 26th when he asked the same exactI suspect that Kumar is from a society that believes that you do not always get the same answer to a question. Experience does indeed indicate some truth in that, for some types of question, but not all. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Nondum ex silvis sumus John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK |
Re: Regarding LT1521-5
I explained this to him on March 26th when he asked the same exact question. ?Kumar does not seem to learn. As a Linear Tech internal Senior Applications engineer located at the factory for 14 years who trained FSE/FAE, a schematic would never be allowed to leave the company. ? As a regular conduct of business, ?even applications engineers never saw a schematic too. ? Not that they could not see it. ?It just that in most cases unless there was some difficult debug involved during IC development, there was never any need to. ? Internal application engineers could simply talk to the IC designer on the phone at any time and get all the info they needed. ? FAE's would have even a harder time getting any such information since they are not really allowed to talk to the IC designers for common customer support issues. ?The are supposed to go to the internal applications people first for support. ?The goal it to keep the IC designer designing IC's and not get caught up in everyday support issues. Linear does not allow its IC to go into any medical product that involves life support. ?It is a liability issue Linear does not want to accept. ?If there is medical application involved, John is correct that discussing it with a sales engineer would be advisable to see if Linear will allow it. On May 21, 2014, at 1:15 AM, John Woodgate jmw@... [LTspice] wrote:
Best Regards, Mark Gurries Electrical Engineer DCC Website & NMRA DCC Clinics: |
Re: Regarding LT1521-5
John Woodgate
In message <1400658314.45008.YahooMailNeo@...>,
dated Wed, 21 May 2014, "Kesi Kumar kesikumar.iitg@... [LTspice]" <LTspice@...> writes: i want discrete circuit dirgram of LT1521-5 , i have block digram ofThe information you require is almost certainly confidential. You should explain your requirements to your Field Service Engineer or other formal contact at LT. In any case, you need to discuss the use of ANY electronic device in an implanted device with the manufacturer. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Nondum ex silvis sumus John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK |
Regarding LT1521-5
i want discrete circuit dirgram of LT1521-5 , i have block digram of LT1521-5 but i dont want block digram as i m working on implant device so i cannot block diagram so, can anybody suggest me from where should i get whole circuit digram of LT1521-5. I had seen ? details ...but actually i want searching for discrete diagram ....can anybody give me right path to proceed.. Thank You Kesi Kumar ? |
Re: Current Step Algorithm
> It is maybe faster to not use compares but formulate all as > float-operations: mul, div. That's not entirely true: multiplications and divisions are much slower compared to conditional checks, which may be the fastest, computational-wise. Still, I'll stick to what I said related to not using behavioural sources but, instead, E or G sources within a subcircuit. As they say, "your mileage may vary". Vlad ______________________ -- holding, among others: a universal analog/digital filter, block-level models for power electronics (and not only), math blocks with a more stream-lined approach, some digital ADC, DAC, (synchronous-)counter, JKflop, etc. |
Re: Photodiode
Hello,
A photo diode is simply a large area diode. The large area results in large capacitance Cjo. The incident light will be converted to current in the photo diode. Thus the second part of the model is simply a current source with current proportional to the amount of received light. This current source is parallel to this diode. The file "all_files.htm" with links to every file is here: Search in all_files.htm with "photo" and open/run the examples you will find. The do a second search with "solar". Best regards, Helmut |