Re: Linear Transformer Model Which Can Also Simulate its LPF Function
Rpar = R(af+bf^2) near enough,
for suitable values or R, a and b. You need data on the core
material to determine them. af is eddy-current loss and bf^2
is hysteresis loss.
======================================================================================
Best wishes
John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only
Rayleigh, Essex UK
I hear, and I forget.
I see, and I remember.
I do, and I understand.
Xunzi (340 - 245 BC)
On 2023-07-05 12:25, Tony Casey wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 05/07/2023 13:06, Kerim via groups.io wrote:
Now the question
is how we can translate this to an equivalent circuit.
None of the actual various equivalent circuits of a transformer
seems being able to simulate its function as a stand-alone LPF!
Are you adding a shunt resistance (Rpar) to simulate core loss?
--
Regards,
Tony
|
Re: Linear Transformer Model Which Can Also Simulate its LPF Function
I understand that, but the resonant winding is not visible to
users. Ferroresonant xformers appear to be two-winding devices for
all practical purposes.
Donald.
On 2023-07-05 05:09, Jerry Lee Marcel
wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Le 05/07/2023 ¨¤ 10:58, Donald H
Locker via groups.io a ¨¦crit?:
Sounds like a ferroresonant power conditioner. Does that ring
a bell? I don't think they are very efficient, but they are
quite effective at producing sine waves from all kinds of
nasty inputs.
OP specified "pure sinewave inverters which use conventional two-winding
iron core transformers."
|
Re: Linear Transformer Model Which Can Also Simulate its LPF Function
On 05/07/2023 13:06, Kerim via groups.io wrote:
Now the question is
how we can translate this to an equivalent circuit.
None of the actual various equivalent circuits of a transformer
seems being able to simulate its function as a stand-alone LPF!
Are you adding a shunt resistance (Rpar) to simulate core loss?
--
Regards,
Tony
|
Re: Linear Transformer Model Which Can Also Simulate its LPF Function
Losses as a resistor in parallels with the winding and less
significantly paraitic capacitance.
Remember that losses increase largely with frequency, so harmonics
and switching residuals are attenuated more than the fundamental.
The basic linear model cannot represent that accurately. You have
to consider one value of Rloss for fundamental, and other values
for harmonivs and residuals.
Le 05/07/2023 ¨¤ 13:06, Kerim via
groups.io a ¨¦crit?:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 01:45 PM, Alan Pearce wrote:
Don't forget that the iron core will have losses at
the switching frequency, along with the inductance of the
windings which will have a significant impedance to the high
frequency switching. These will all have an affect on the output
waveform, forcing it to be more sinusoidal.
Now the question is how we can translate this to an equivalent
circuit.
None of the actual various equivalent circuits of a transformer
seems being able to simulate its function as a stand-alone LPF!
|
Re: Linear Transformer Model Which Can Also Simulate its LPF Function
On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 01:45 PM, Alan Pearce wrote:
Don't forget that the iron core will have losses at the switching frequency, along with the inductance of the windings which will have a significant impedance to the high frequency switching. These will all have an affect on the output waveform, forcing it to be more sinusoidal.
Now the question is how we can translate this to an equivalent circuit. None of the actual various equivalent circuits of a transformer seems being able to simulate its function as a stand-alone LPF!
|
Re: Linear Transformer Model Which Can Also Simulate its LPF Function
Don't forget that the iron core will have losses at the switching frequency, along with the inductance of the windings which will have a significant impedance to the high frequency switching. These will all have an affect on the output waveform, forcing it to be more sinusoidal.
On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 01:04 PM, Jerry Lee Marcel wrote:
That's because the leakage inductance is rather high.
So, in your opinion, what could be the other element in the transformer to complete its LPF response since there is no load at its HV output?
|
Re: Linear Transformer Model Which Can Also Simulate its LPF Function
On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 01:04 PM, Jerry Lee Marcel wrote:
That's because the leakage inductance is rather high.
So, in your opinion, what could be the other element in the transformer to complete its LPF response since there is no load at its HV output?
|
Re: Linear Transformer Model Which Can Also Simulate its LPF Function
That's because the leakage inductance is rather high.
Le 05/07/2023 ¨¤ 11:33, Kerim via
groups.io a ¨¦crit?:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 11:48 AM, John Woodgate wrote:
The 'other element'
is mostly the load resistance reflected into the primary
circuit.
Your answer is
logical.
But I was surprised when I
tested a ready-made inverter, its HV output (of a
conventional iron core transformer) was sinewave even
without a capacitor as a load!
|
Re: Linear Transformer Model Which Can Also Simulate its LPF Function
On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 11:48 AM, John Woodgate wrote:
The 'other element' is mostly the load resistance reflected into the primary circuit.
Your answer is logical.
But I was surprised when I tested a ready-made inverter, its HV output (of a conventional iron core transformer) was sinewave even without a capacitor as a load!
|
Re: Linear Transformer Model Which Can Also Simulate its LPF Function
Le 05/07/2023 ¨¤ 10:58, Donald H Locker
via groups.io a ¨¦crit?:
Sounds like a ferroresonant power conditioner. Does that ring a
bell? I don't think they are very efficient, but they are quite
effective at producing sine waves from all kinds of nasty
inputs.
OP specified "pure sinewave inverters which use conventional two-winding
iron core transformers."
|
Re: Linear Transformer Model Which Can Also Simulate its LPF Function
Sounds like a ferroresonant power conditioner. Does that ring a
bell? I don't think they are very efficient, but they are quite
effective at producing sine waves from all kinds of nasty inputs.
Donald.
On 2023-07-05 04:00, Kerim via
groups.io wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I guess many of
you, if not all, heard of pure sinewave inverters which use
conventional two-winding iron core transformers.
Their transformer
is driven by a MOSFET bridge which, in turn, is driven by a
sinewave PWM (for 60/50 Hz) whose frequency could be 16 KHz, for
example.
This means that
the transformer, with or without load, can also act as an
effective low pass filter (perhaps with a very small ripple on
its output voltage).
?
My first thought
is that the transformer¡¯s leakage inductances play the main
element(s) in its function as LPF. But there must be another
element to complete the LPF. Is it the stray capacitances, the
core losses or both?
?
In vain, I have
searched a linear model which could be used in simulating a
transformer in such application.
I wonder if
someone recalls that such a model could exist in the group¡¯s
archive so that I will redo my search looking for it.
?
Thank you.
Kerim
|
Re: Linear Transformer Model Which Can Also Simulate its LPF Function
The leakage inductance, in conjunction with the resistive part of the load, constitutes a 1st-order LPF. The stray capacitances are in most cases negligible in this respect.
|
Re: Linear Transformer Model Which Can Also Simulate its LPF Function
The 'other element' is mostly
the load resistance reflected into the primary circuit.
======================================================================================
Best wishes
John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only
Rayleigh, Essex UK
I hear, and I forget.
I see, and I remember.
I do, and I understand.
Xunzi (340 - 245 BC)
On 2023-07-05 09:00, Kerim via
groups.io wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I guess many of
you, if not all, heard of pure sinewave inverters which use
conventional two-winding iron core transformers.
Their transformer
is driven by a MOSFET bridge which, in turn, is driven by a
sinewave PWM (for 60/50 Hz) whose frequency could be 16 KHz, for
example.
This means that
the transformer, with or without load, can also act as an
effective low pass filter (perhaps with a very small ripple on
its output voltage).
?
My first thought
is that the transformer¡¯s leakage inductances play the main
element(s) in its function as LPF. But there must be another
element to complete the LPF. Is it the stray capacitances, the
core losses or both?
?
In vain, I have
searched a linear model which could be used in simulating a
transformer in such application.
I wonder if
someone recalls that such a model could exist in the group¡¯s
archive so that I will redo my search looking for it.
?
Thank you.
Kerim
|
Linear Transformer Model Which Can Also Simulate its LPF Function
I guess many of you, if not all, heard of pure sinewave inverters which use conventional two-winding iron core transformers.
Their transformer is driven by a MOSFET bridge which, in turn, is driven by a sinewave PWM (for 60/50 Hz) whose frequency could be 16 KHz, for example.
This means that the transformer, with or without load, can also act as an effective low pass filter (perhaps with a very small ripple on its output voltage).
?
My first thought is that the transformer¡¯s leakage inductances play the main element(s) in its function as LPF. But there must be another element to complete the LPF. Is it the stray capacitances, the core losses or both?
?
In vain, I have searched a linear model which could be used in simulating a transformer in such application.
I wonder if someone recalls that such a model could exist in the group¡¯s archive so that I will redo my search looking for it.
?
Thank you.
Kerim
|
Re: No MAX31740 Spice Model
Hello !
Does this suit you ?
/g/LTspice/files/Temp/MAX31740.zip
|
|
|
Yes.
You can use it in a text file with an .inc directive.
OR
You can place it on the schematic as .model statement, then use v49DL45 in the Diode symbol "value" attribute.
However, remove "t_measured=27" from the .model? statement. It is not needed or recognized in LTspice.
|
Hello, I found a PSpice model at Vishay.
?
****
Copyright 2020 Vishay Intertechnology, Inc.
All rights reserved.
****
*produced by Vishay General Semiconductor Taiwan
*Allen Su, 2017/10/24
* PSPICE
.MODEL v40dl45 D IS=6E-005 RS=0.003654 N=1.234
+ CJO=9929p M=1.662 VJ=14.52 TT=246p eg=0.67 xti=6.3 BV=49.5 IBV=222.79 t_measured=27
Can I use this as text (.inc) in the schematic, or does a component have to be created?
Thanks very much
?
|
Re: Scaling a lithium ion battery schematic
Ahh, yes; thanks very much.
T
|
Re: Scaling a lithium ion battery schematic
On 04/07/2023 14:47, Tim Hutcheson via groups.io wrote:
Tony, since limit(x,y,z) is? equivalent to min(max(x,y),z)
shouldn't your original limit expression
B3 vsoc1 0 I=limit(0,1,V(vsoc1))*I(V1)
have been written as
B3 vsoc1 0 I=limit(V(vsoc1),0,1)*I(V1)
although it doesn't seem to matter in this case.
I think you have me confused with eetech00. My B-source expression didn't have a limit() function, which changes the discharge characteristic from linear to logarithmic. In any event, the order of the arguments in the limit() function doesn't matter - the answer is always the middle value, unless two of them evaluate to the same value, in which case that's the answer. This very thing was discussed recently. Don't forget, all three arguments could be variables. The B-source expression can further be simplified and improved to: I=if(V(vsoc1)>0,I(R10),0)..because V(SOC1) cannot be greater than 1, so long as the analysis time doesn't exceed the length of the PWL, in which case everything goes pear-shaped, anyway.
--
Regards,
Tony
|
John Woodgate
Tony Casey
Tim Hutcheson