Re: FFT Resolution
In message <CALBs-TgcwTBCyW1+=wNz4R7Yk09QHzk1sbNYC1ii8HU7SecrFg@...>, dated Mon, 16 Dec 2013, Andy <Andrew.Ingraham@...> writes: This is all good stuff, but could you please comment
By
John Woodgate <jmw@...>
·
#68661
·
|
Re: CD74HC4017E.sym missing pins
Steve wrote: I am new to LTSpice but I have experience with AutoCadd. Pins 8 and 16 are That depends on the component's SPICE model. Some SPICE models do not require power connections because the
By
Andy I
·
#68660
·
|
Re: FFT Resolution
ronw6wo wrote: I would like to be clear on at least one matter " 'the value of the window" I think "the value of the window" as used before, refers to the time interval that was simulated and sent to
By
Andy I
·
#68659
·
|
Re: FFT Resolution
ronw6wo wrote, " this is my first attempt to model FT behaviour". Here are some tips. (1) To get finer frequency resolution in the FFT results, you need to use longer simulation times. The two are
By
Andy I
·
#68658
·
|
CD74HC4017E.sym missing pins
I am new to LTSpice but I have experience with AutoCadd. Pins 8 and 16 are missing and I can't add them to the .sym model. How do I power this IC? Any advice or workaround will be appreciated. Steve
By
grampastentis@...
·
#68657
·
|
Re: LTspice Install problem under linux
"Business Kid" wrote, " Is this a 'known issue?' (m$ speak for A BUG)? Where should I report it?" The way to report bugs (if it continues to be one) is via email to: "LTspice @ linear.com" (remove the
By
Andy I
·
#68656
·
|
Re: LTspice Install problem under linux
Hello, I also had a problem to update LTspice on two WIN7 PCs the last week. When I clicked on Sync Release, it simply did nothing. It behaved like when another LTspice is open. I rebooted the PCs and
By
Helmut Sennewald
·
#68655
·
|
LTspice Install problem under linux
I can't install the latest update in linux. It certainly doesn't go in painlessly like the last one did, and may need shoehorning in. That's a pity, because I uninstalled the older version. Is this a
By
Business Kid <business.kid@...>
·
#68654
·
|
Re: Perl Optimizer initiation problems
thanks a lot, i will try it and hope it will work Jad
By
Jad Taki
·
#68652
·
|
Re: FFT Resolution
In message <ENcQOfEjUjrSFwah@...>, dated Sun, 15 Dec 2013, John Woodgate <jmw@...> writes: I'm sorry: I got a bit confused myself in trying to explain this and I
By
John Woodgate <jmw@...>
·
#68653
·
|
Re: UC 3825 Ltspice Model
Hi Andrew. Look http://ltwiki.org/index.php5?title=Components_Library_and_Circuits File is LTspiceIV.zip. It contains a files Valvol.lib and UC3825.asy. Bordodynov.
By
§¡§Ý§Ö§Ü§ã§Ñ§ß§Õ§â §¢§à§â§Õ§à§Õ§í§ß§à§Ó
·
#68651
·
|
Re: My collection of models and examples for LTspice.
Hi. My file 100MEG LTspiceDoc contained different files with instructions on using LTspice. These files I found on the internet. Files including in Russian. Links to some of them are in this group.
By
§¡§Ý§Ö§Ü§ã§Ñ§ß§Õ§â §¢§à§â§Õ§à§Õ§í§ß§à§Ó
·
#68650
·
|
Re: Questions about phase in .AC LTspice Analysis
Hello Andy, Thank for sharing your thoughts with me. I discover something that I do not understand. Maybe you or other people can answer my questions. All 2stages_2CascodeDiff_ACsim_test1_orig.asc,
By
hoa van nguyen <hnguyen4280@...>
·
#68649
·
|
Re: FFT Resolution
Hello Ron, If you want 100Hz resolution, you have to simulate at least 1/100s=10ms. I have uploaded an example "fft10meg.asc" to the Temp-folder folder. I simulated 20ms.
By
Helmut Sennewald
·
#68648
·
|
Re: A Noisy Question
I guess my question with respect to noise and LTspice is how the time step between noise samples is established? And, how is it then interpreted - as a PWL source, for example? All I see is .noise - I
By
Jim Wagner
·
#68646
·
|
Re: FFT Resolution
In message <l8l5j2+4h2m77@...>, dated Sun, 15 Dec 2013, ronw6wo@... writes: It isn't very clear. No. It's the 'width' in frequency of one window. Working backwards through that last
By
John Woodgate <jmw@...>
·
#68647
·
|
Re: A Noisy Question
Hi Jim,
By
David Hawkins
·
#68645
·
|
Re: FFT Resolution
RC and John Thanks for the response,but I am blinded by science now as this is my first attempt to model FT behaviour I would like to be clear on at least one matter " 'the value of the window" Is
By
Ron Skelton
·
#68644
·
|
Re: A Noisy Question
I don't think that will give a very good approximation to Gaussian noise. You might want to try the Box-Mueller method.
By
monettsys <405a82e5@...>
·
#68643
·
|
Re: Cmos 4026
In message <CAFL0OtQZcJSRTgEKrDT3ObSrjGatJzBfoLanqGr7Y2uN6vZOOQ@...>, dated Sun, 15 Dec 2013, Business Kid <business.kid@...> writes: No doubt, but the fact that they are very slow by
By
John Woodgate <jmw@...>
·
#68642
·
|