开云体育

I haven't got to 24.1.7 yet, but I've not noticed any increased propensity to crash, so far. But then, I still have 24.0.12 and 17.1.15 running alongside 24.1.x. I still use 24.0.12 as default for the

Jurek, are you looking for something like a solar panel I/V curve? Maybe look at the SA Sim.zip I just uploaded. Dave Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2025 1:27 PM To: [email protected] Subject: EXTERNAL:

LTspice was very robust before, and rarely crashed even when errors happened.? Some of the recent changes (24.1.x) made it less robust.? Hopefully ADI can restore what was lost. Andy

No, even when it states in throes of death: "untrapped err........" -- Regards, Tony

If you want a graph of an over-current protection circuit, what does it matter what Vin is? Surely what you're interested in is Iout vs. Vout? -- Regards, Tony

Hello, I would like to create a simulation of overcurrent protection circuit — a graph where the Y-axis shows the current drop (in Amperes), and the X-axis shows a linear increase of voltage in the

Even so, an app should not quit without an error message. -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software. www.avg.com

@eetech00: Unfortunately, you're not the author/maintainer so what you think should or should not happen may not have much effect on what actually happens. Many compilers will happily EXIT when the

Please note that there are parameters epsilon=100m revepsilon=4. They represent quadratic sections.

Yes. Like I wrote, the configuration is unintentional, but nevertheless, it shouldn't cause a program exit.

LTspice used to remove both I1 and D1 as they were both shorted.? But 24.1 was a major re-write and it might not do that anymore. Andy

It doesn't crash version 24.0.11, but it's a nonsense .ASC, isn't it? LTspice can't find I1, presumably because it's shorted. -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.

The following circuit configuration was unintentional, but caused an LTspice program exit upon simulation run. * Generated by LTspice 24.1.7 for Windows. I1 0 0 1m D1 0 0 D V1 ADJ 0 0 .model D D .lib

Back to the subject: I managed to get the critical points resolved. There were precision problems, where the ton got negative or the pulsewidth overshooted. I fine tuned that and it is sufficient to

A-ha.? Yes, that's true? You used the special "conduction region-wise linear model" which is very different from the regular diode model which is based on the universal Shockley Ideal Diode

Just an FYI - that last one is not the email address you used, and not the one you are subscribed with.? That is the way Groups.io sends out messages to members.? It needs to convert their email

Christoph, I am not seeing any evidence that you either added an Email Alias for yourself, or that you subscribed (separately) from your University email address. But I do see a photo in your profile.

The one from my university account bounced, saying I'm not subscribed with that (physics) address. This one goes through? -- Christoph

This is a test, whether both of my emails now work. Please ignore -- Christoph

BTW, it's best to send a separate message if you upload something to Files > Temp. Most people do not see the automatically generated message if you check the "Notify Members" box. If you? know how