Re: Sawtooth waveform by simple BJTs, but dips at the top.
Quite probably not. Let's consider what makes these two integrators different.? ?I'm talking about U1 = LT1220 in "Lab 4 Integrator Square 500us with PWL.asc", versus U1 = MCP6001 in
By
Andy I
·
#159378
·
|
Re: Sawtooth waveform by simple BJTs, but dips at the top.
ericsson.sunshine, Allow me to ask.? What is this for?? Is the plan to build one of these circuits (not just to simulate it) where it has a useful purpose? The first few circuits you uploaded were
By
Andy I
·
#159377
·
|
Re: Sallen Key Filter Capacitor at feedback network
Pity; I was looking forward to dissecting that. -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software. www.avg.com
By
John Woodgate
·
#159376
·
|
Re: Sallen Key Filter Capacitor at feedback network
FYI - Antonios deleted the files already, before their message was approved. I'm guessing they answered their own question already.? Perhaps no follow-up is needed anymore. Andy
By
Andy I
·
#159375
·
|
Re: Sallen Key Filter Capacitor at feedback network
You should not have uploaded to Files. Uploads go into Files/Temp. I can't find your upload in Files, or in Temp. Please upload it to Files/Temp. -- OOO - Own Opinions only If something is true: * as
By
John Woodgate
·
#159374
·
|
Sallen Key Filter Capacitor at feedback network
Hello everyone, I am designing an Analog Front-End for biosignals (EMGs). You can find the corresponding circuit here /g/LTspice/files/EMG_AFE.asc. I have selected INA317 as an
By
antonios.doukakis@...
·
#159373
·
|
Re: Singular matrix
Update: Change V2 from 13VDC to: PULSE(0 13 0 100u 0 1 2 1) .. and the whole simulation works OK in both 24.0.12 and 24.1.5. You might also try using the "startup" switch in the .TRAN directive, which
By
Tony Casey
·
#159372
·
|
Re: Singular matrix
I tested the whole schematic by removing the PTC and with R2 grounded, in a .OP analysis, and it didn't work in either 24.0.12 or 24.1.5 , although the errors are different: 24.1.5 24.0.12
By
Tony Casey
·
#159371
·
|
Re: Sawtooth waveform by simple BJTs, but dips at the top.
Hi, Jim: Forget the previous files, I found another , which don't neet a PWL source, only DC-supply needed. Yes, of course, I miss this one, again.? The oscillation's very well.
By
ericsson.sunshine@...
·
#159370
·
Edited
|
Re: Sawtooth waveform by simple BJTs, but dips at the top.
Please label plotted nodes. Nothing shows where node n001 is! Jim
By
Jim Wagner
·
#159369
·
|
Re: Sawtooth waveform by simple BJTs, but dips at the top.
Hi, : I'm sorry... I miss this, in the following two examples, they shows same phenomemon , there are peaks at the top.
By
ericsson.sunshine@...
·
#159368
·
|
Re: LTspice non-inverting Opamp loop gain.
For inverting amplifier (like LTspice example) input connected with ground for open loop test. You can test what happened if you short input with ground for non-inverted amplifier (simple Opamp with 2
By
LV
·
#159367
·
|
Re: Singular matrix
Sorry. Yes, you're right. -- Regards, Tony
By
Tony Casey
·
#159366
·
|
Re: LTspice non-inverting Opamp loop gain.
Amazing what Google's AI spits out...
By
DerekK
·
#159365
·
|
Re: LTspice non-inverting Opamp loop gain.
Hi, Victor. Perhaps I should say 'Salve, Victor'! I think you need to explain a bit more about your question. What is it about the Tian method that you need more information on? In the first place,
By
John Woodgate
·
#159364
·
|
Re: LTspice non-inverting Opamp loop gain.
This one? https://www.analog.com/en/resources/glossary/non-inverting-op-amp.html Read youself what you sent. I ask about stability, open loop modelling (Tian method), NOT how to build non-inverting
By
LV
·
#159363
·
|
Re: LTspice non-inverting Opamp loop gain.
*Actually*, Dave (me) is not a purist about this side topic! I expected one of the real purists to chime in before this. I pointed Victor towards a tutorial on the subject he was asking about. Dave
By
Bell, Dave
·
#159362
·
|
Re: LTspice non-inverting Opamp loop gain.
I asking exactly about LTspice example and how to modify open loop probes and input for non-inverting amp. Sorry, I no need empty answers. If you dond`t know how - skip my question and drink tea. --
By
LV
·
#159361
·
|
Re: LTspice non-inverting Opamp loop gain.
Dave is a wee bit purist on what is on-topic. The list has very many members , so we can expect differences of opinion, and accept them. -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus
By
John Woodgate
·
#159360
·
|
Re: LTspice non-inverting Opamp loop gain.
Dave Bell wrote: You will soon be told this forum is for LTspice-specific questions, not for electronic design.? :{) But I would suggest: What's your point Dave? Should we not be doing what we are
By
BRUCE108
·
#159359
·
|