开云体育

I think it would make a difference because the solver has to determine additional unknowns with more capacitors, namely the current through each individual capacitor. There are no additional nodes,

Convert the error number to hex. Then Google is your friend. The Windows error code 0xc0000409 is a software exception error that can occur when an application is installed incorrectly Sent: Thursday,

Yes it is a windows error, something about a stack buffer overrun, not sure what to make of that. The message "Simulation failed with status code <status code>" Is my code in the except block of the

Yes...its minor and cosmetic. But if it were me I would have fixed it a long time ago.

On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 10:31 AM, Jeff Kayzerman wrote: > > I tried putting all the symbols under the same folder as the simulation. > Let me try to better describe what I am doing. > > A python

It's been around for a very long time.? A decade or two?? I think there would be no reason for them to pick up on that one particular thing that has been there for so many years, unless somebody

Presumably that is a Windows status code.? I think it did not come from LTspice, but it might mean Windows is telling you that LTspice did not exit happily. Can you find what that error code means,

Yes, I read all the advice and started out with a very low value for CSHUNT, but ended up with 5pF in order to get convergence. However, this was BEFORE I added the LT1375. Rather than a proper SMPS I

Oh...I would think they would fix that in this version The command works right, just looks weird.

Hi Andy No...it doesn't seem to matter. I also discovered if the statement is changed to a comment, the behavior is the same.

Sorry, I misunderstood: That is not a new bug in 24.1.4.? The fact that the schematic editor displays it with the overbar, that is.? It has "always" worked that way, I think ever since LTspice had

I tried putting all the symbols under the same folder as the simulation. Let me try to better describe what I am doing. A python service is polling an AWS message queue for incoming instructions to

Does it work to put the filenames in quotes?? As a temporary workaround. I'm guessing it's a bug caused by changing the code for labeling nets/pins with the overbar, meaning "NOT". Analog Devices

If I add .inc/.lib statement on schematic: .inc file(3)_LT.txt It is converted to: .inc file(3)(overbar)LT.txt The "LT" characters get an overbar. Seems if a parenth, bracket, curly brace is preceded

I've never tried it with a switcher, but once I looked at the ripple voltage and current at the reservoir capacitor of a simple power supply, and saw what appeared to be a 'ghost' of the series

For resevoir and pump capacitors in switchers, I have found that adding ESR close to reality for the capacitor type, size and capacitance makes things better. I have also found that adding some

Let me see if I understand.? You have 3 5 or 6 ideal capacitors connected in parallel, which fails?? And when replaced by one ideal capacitor with the same total capacitance, it doesn't? I just want

You probably meant to say that you increased the tolerance values.? But you did that by making the magnitude of their negative exponents smaller, right?? So it's confusing to keep it straight, which

FYI, that is not unusual.? Combining models into the same simulation is often what causes misbehavior to rear its ugly head.? It's just how things often go. Another thing you might consider, is

Keep in mind, 5pF will be added to every single node in the circuit.? If you have an IC, which it appears you do (LT1375HV, maybe others), then it is added to every internal node of those models