¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date
Re: Multi-cycle current control
Hi Andy, Thanks for pointing that out. YES, I missed the missing dot (.) in front of the "options plotwinsize=0" I will blame the oversight on the highly acute and superior vision, which seems to
By Mike Fraser · #147661 ·
Re: Multi-cycle current control
John, Here is a follow-up to yesterday's mention of the spurious stuff at 3.33 Hz (and odd harmonics) that was about 80 dB below the fundamental. It's an artifact.? It's not in the signal. I am not
By Andy I · #147660 ·
Re: Multi-cycle current control
Mike, maybe you missed it, but I answered John already.? John wrote "options" instead of ".options".? That turned it from a dot-command to a lossy transmission line, and gave us the error. Andy
By Andy I · #147659 ·
Re: Multi-cycle current control
Hi John, I do not know why this works. I changed the commands on the schematic to include more precision. .options numdgt=10 .options measdgt=10 .options plotwinsize=0 is listed on it's own seperate
By Mike Fraser · #147658 ·
Re: Multi-cycle current control
John, The command-line you tried to add was "options plotwinsize=0".? That.s OK, except that it is missing the leading period.? So, LTspice sees it as an attempt to add an O-device, which is a Lossy
By Andy I · #147657 ·
Re: Multi-cycle current control
Thanks, Andy. I have uploaded '3-cycle sine symmetry.asc'. To see the waveforms, simulate for 120 ms. You may tell me that I don't need to specify the PWL for as much as 120 ms, but that raises an
By John Woodgate · #147656 ·
Re: Multi-cycle current control
I am pretty sure that the "Missing node(s)" warning is not related to the ".options plotwinsize=0".? I can't see any way that one would cause the other. Any chance of uploading the schematic? It's
By Andy I · #147654 ·
Re: Multi-cycle current control
I am now looking at another control method that changes the amplitudes of successive half-cycles of the sine wav, in the sequence 1,0.5,0.5,1, 0.5,0.5,1,0.5,0.5,1,0.5,0.5. I made a PWL voltage source
By John Woodgate · #147653 ·
Re: Bad noise models for jfet transistors #NOISE
Yes, this is a "known" problem, and it's been known for a rather long time.? It was before Tony's message in 2022 ( /g/LTspice/message/138735 ).? I don't recall exactly when it was
By Andy I · #147652 ·
Re: Bad noise models for jfet transistors #NOISE
Can you share the "good" jfet models or point me to where I can find them? Thanks
By @bobobob · #147651 ·
Re: Bad noise models for jfet transistors #NOISE
I have written about this several times in this group, starting with #138735 </g/LTspice/message/138735>. I have also complained to ADI about it a number of times. All to no avail. It
By Tony Casey · #147650 ·
Re: Bad noise models for jfet transistors #NOISE
My files are tools and one should take care of them.
By Richard Andrews · #147649 ·
Re: Bad noise models for jfet transistors #NOISE
I always do a backup of my stuff before updating, but I haven't updated in a long time, because wouldn't of they done it right the first time?
By Richard Andrews · #147648 ·
Bad noise models for jfet transistors #NOISE
I haven't updated for a long time (since March 15). Now I updated and found that Linear Systems' JFET models have been changed. From weakly wrong noise models they replaced them with ultra-noisy
By §¡§Ý§Ö§Ü§ã§Ñ§ß§Õ§â §¢§à§â§Õ§à§Õ§í§ß§à§Ó · #147647 ·
Re: BPS19 equiv.
It seams if I go with a little higher collector current the ZTX458 works just fine.
By Richard Andrews · #147646 ·
Re: Reflected power in RF power supplies
Thank you for your information!
By minsun@... · #147645 ·
Re: BPS19 equiv.
Thanks for the help guys. I guess there is no through hole replacement of the BPS19 which is SMD.
By Richard Andrews · #147644 ·
Re: Reflected power in RF power supplies
/g/Test-Equipment-Design-Construction/ You're right; this discussion is off-topic for LTspice. Have you considered /g/Test-Equipment-Design-Construction/ They have
By Donald H Locker · #147643 ·
Re: BPS19 equiv.
Oops, sorry. Now I can't find the BPS19 either. I expect it's shy and you have frightened it away. I'm sure I did find it. BPS19: f_t 200 MHz Vce 20 V BFS19 f_t 260 MHz? Vce 30 V.
By John Woodgate · #147642 ·
Re: BPS19 equiv.
John wrote, " That's odd. I found several. Try: https://assets.nexperia.com/documents/data-sheet/BFS19.pdf ". No, that's the BFS19.? Richard asked about the BPS19. My take on it is that BPS19 is
By Andy I · #147641 ·