Re: Warning: Multiple definitions of model ...
Bernhard, Those Warning messages about "Multiple definitions" of those four BJTs can be ignored.??The good news is that they are only Warnings.? And in your case, they do not affect your
By
Andy I
·
#147235
·
|
Re: Warning: Multiple definitions of model ...
For BC847C Rohm offers the SPICE parameter set of BC547B. Therefore the current gain of the BC847C model is too low. In the LTspice standard.bjt there are BC847B and BC847BT116, both from Rohm and
By
Bernhard Weiskopf
·
#147234
·
|
Re: Periodic signal from PWL file
There is an undocumented REPEAT feature in the Wiki at: /g/LTspice/wiki/13810 /A list of data points or a file reference can be repeated a fixed amount of times <n>, or forever// //
By
John Woodgate
·
#147233
·
|
Re: Periodic signal from PWL file
Yes you can. Here is an example: PWL repeat forever (0 0 0.5 1 1.5 -1 2 0) endrepeat You can use the same syntax with a PWL file, too. -- Regards, Tony
By
Tony Casey
·
#147232
·
|
Periodic signal from PWL file
I have created a pulse source from a PWL file. It¡®s 32 samples of a signal. Is it possible to make this pulse train periodic? Or do I have to provide the pulse samples for every period by the PWL
By
Christoph
·
#147231
·
|
Re: Warning: Multiple definitions of model ...
On 08/07/2023 14:18, Mike Fraser wrote: > I have the latest update to LTspice 17.1.9. > In my opinion, the transistor listing has reached a point where it canot be trusted. > ? ? ? ? ? Anyone
By
Tony Casey
·
#147230
·
|
Re: Warning: Multiple definitions of model ...
I have the latest update to LTspice 17.1.9. In my opinion, the transistor listing has reached a point where it canot be trusted. Anyone using the built in BJT listing needs to double or triple check
By
Mike Fraser
·
#147229
·
|
Re: Warning: Multiple definitions of model ...
The deleted devices are in my Netlist, not the Error Log. ====================================================================================== Best wishes John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only
By
John Woodgate
·
#147228
·
|
Re: Warning: Multiple definitions of model ...
Interesting. I have just tested with "NPN" and "D" but none of them are replaced acc. to the "SPICE Error Log" file (Ctrl+L). But the multiple definitions of bjt models is still present. My test file
By
Bernhard Weiskopf
·
#147227
·
|
Re: Warning: Multiple definitions of model ...
I was just about to post another example of this. In addition, I find in the netlist generic devices NPN, PNP and D, which were in the .ASC but have been replaced by real devices, BC547B, BC557B and
By
John Woodgate
·
#147226
·
|
Warning: Multiple definitions of model ...
Since several weeks the "SPICE Error Log" file contains these lines even when these transistors are not used: Warning: Multiple definitions of model "2scr375p" Type: BJT Warning: Multiple definitions
By
Bernhard Weiskopf
·
#147225
·
|
Re: I am unable to add and use the BS138 (BSS138) model for simulation Iin LTSpice. can anyone help me with this
I have made a VMOS model based on the Onsemi datasheet, which adheres pretty well to all the graphs. Unfortunately, I can't upload ATM, as our power has been taken out by a big thunderstorm. --
By
Tony Casey
·
#147223
·
|
Re: ISL70444SEH declaration issue?
FYI - Op-amp GBP or bandwidth is only one consideration. Also there are the effects of the external components, such as the feedback capacitor, the output load, gain-peaking, etc.. Also slew rate.?
By
Andy I
·
#147222
·
|
Re: ISL70444SEH declaration issue?
mliccione89 wrote, "I'm not getting what I expect to see at the output of the TIA." What did you expect to see? It looks to me like you are sending very narrow (~ 2 ns wide) pulses into the TIA.? How
By
Andy I
·
#147221
·
|
Re: I am unable to add and use the BS138 (BSS138) model for simulation Iin LTSpice. can anyone help me with this
Richard wrote, "I just went to diodes.com and found the newest spice model for the BSS138. ( https://www.diodes.com/spice/download/1838/BSS138.spice.txt ) " And ... what is your point? That was one of
By
Andy I
·
#147220
·
|
Re: ISL70444SEH declaration issue?
Thanks Tony et al. I did totally flub the initial file upload. I've moved on to using this opamp for my intended purpose, as a TIA that can pass pulses from a photodetector. I'm not getting what I
By
@sparky1111
·
#147219
·
|
Re: I am unable to add and use the BS138 (BSS138) model for simulation Iin LTSpice. can anyone help me with this
I just went to diodes.com and found the newest spice model for the BSS138. ( https://www.diodes.com/spice/download/1838/BSS138.spice.txt )
By
Richard Andrews
·
#147218
·
|
Re: can the Sam Ben-Yaakov self-adjusting switched-capacitors 4 cells balancer, economically manage 104 cells wired in series?
Then start with the simplest circuit of a single stage, then add stages until it disproves the conjecture. Tim
By
Tim Hutcheson
·
#147217
·
|
Re: can the Sam Ben-Yaakov self-adjusting switched-capacitors 4 cells balancer, economically manage 104 cells wired in series?
IMO, you are wrong, Tim. The video is about a quasi-continuously varable step-down DC/DC converter. Concerning his self-adjusting autonomous 4s battery equalizer, Sam Ben-Yaakov described a natural
By
stephanecnockaert
·
#147216
·
|
Re: can the Sam Ben-Yaakov self-adjusting switched-capacitors 4 cells balancer, economically manage 104 cells wired in series?
Nokia Corporation, unfortunately no series layout.
By
stephanecnockaert
·
#147215
·
|