¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date

Re: Changed owner emails and subscriptions did not transfer over - Group has no owner as of now #owner #email

 

That is exact what I thought. Pretty much the same way with Facebook's process of changing ownership.


On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 6:19 PM Christos G. Psarras <christos@...> wrote:
Pat,

Change you account back to the old address using the same process, then log back into GIO with that original account; that will restore your Owner access to your group.? Then add to the group your new address (DirectAdd or Invite & accept), and promote it to Owner.? Leave both group accounts in there for now.? Repeat the original -> new address change process as before, log in now with the new address, and you should have Owner access as well.

You can now either delete the original owner account from the group, or better yet, leave it as a backup account as it's best practice for an owner to always have some backup way of getting in, just in case (pun intended!); always have a second door, a second owner account address, be it another person or a second email address if there's one owner only.

Cheers,
Christos


Re: Changed owner emails and subscriptions did not transfer over - Group has no owner as of now #owner #email

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Christos,
Thank you for your quick response! I will try the exact steps and get back to you either way.

Best,
Pat

.?


On Jan 15, 2021, at 8:19 PM, Christos G. Psarras <christos@...> wrote:

?Pat,

Change you account back to the old address using the same process, then log back into GIO with that original account; that will restore your Owner access to your group.? Then add to the group your new address (DirectAdd or Invite & accept), and promote it to Owner.? Leave both group accounts in there for now.? Repeat the original -> new address change process as before, log in now with the new address, and you should have Owner access as well.

You can now either delete the original owner account from the group, or better yet, leave it as a backup account as it's best practice for an owner to always have some backup way of getting in, just in case (pun intended!); always have a second door, a second owner account address, be it another person or a second email address if there's one owner only.

Cheers,
Christos


Re: Changed owner emails and subscriptions did not transfer over - Group has no owner as of now #owner #email

 

Pat,

Change you account back to the old address using the same process, then log back into GIO with that original account; that will restore your Owner access to your group.? Then add to the group your new address (DirectAdd or Invite & accept), and promote it to Owner.? Leave both group accounts in there for now.? Repeat the original -> new address change process as before, log in now with the new address, and you should have Owner access as well.

You can now either delete the original owner account from the group, or better yet, leave it as a backup account as it's best practice for an owner to always have some backup way of getting in, just in case (pun intended!); always have a second door, a second owner account address, be it another person or a second email address if there's one owner only.

Cheers,
Christos


Re: Single Owner Group - Owner Deceased

 

On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 03:18 PM, Ken Cameron wrote:


In response to Shal and the selection list, I could see the option to create
a owner/moderator in waiting.
If there is no moderator, yes, we could have a designated member. I'm not yet sure what to call him/her.

In response to the list that has very little traffic, I would expect the
first thing the successor code would do is try to contact the current
owners.
To a certain level this could be automated. When any member clicks the "owner seems AWOL"-button, the system checks when this owner was last active on groups.io (onsite or sent email). If that was too long ago it could send emails to the owner's email-addresses and maybe SMS-text to his/her mobile. Calling by landline would require a human.These email-addresses and phone-numbers could/should be stored by the system without the members of the group having access to them.

If the owner has opted out of the succession-program.. maybe the group should shut down somehow? Like no more new members, and/or no more new topics, untill the owner shows activity?

groetjes/?is, Ronaldo


Re: 2 accounts open at the same time?

 

Niman H <nimanh2000@...> wrote:

Is there a way to have 2 or more accounts (ie, email addresses, I
think that's the right term) open on gio at one time? It would be
helpful to have a moderator and regular member account open at the
same time to see how different settings are affected, etc, instead of
having to log in and out (and in and out). Thanks
Yes, quite easily.

Use two browsers, or use your browser's "Private Browsing" function.
That way you can log in with a second account.

--
rgds
LAurence
<><


Changed owner emails and subscriptions did not transfer over - Group has no owner as of now #owner #email

 

Please Help!

I have created a Group successfully and added members!? However, I should not have used my personal email account.? Subsequent to that, I went through the process successfully of changing my account to a new email address. I received an email asking me to confirm - which I did.? However, it has not transferred my subscriptions as it should and now my Group appears to not have an owner!

I don't want to delete and start over (I just have a couple of members so far) because I we want to be able to use the same Group Name!?

Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Pat


Re: Is There a Way to Clear the History on the Main Page of the Group

 

On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 02:35 PM, Lis R. wrote:
I am running out of space and I have the Basic Account through Groups.io
If you haven't already, you need to read through /helpcenter/ownersmanual/1/viewing-and-managing-your-group-s-storage

Duane
--
The official Groups.io user documentation is in the Groups.io Help Center.
GMF's Unofficial Help Wiki: /g/GroupManagersForum/wiki


Is There a Way to Clear the History on the Main Page of the Group

Lis R.
 

?
Thanks Everyone!? Plus, I thought I saw it somewhere how to clear, I am running out of space and I have the Basic Account through Groups.io!
?
Lis
?
Hugz, Lis
?


Re: 2 accounts open at the same time?

 

On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 09:53 PM, Dan Tucker - FireTuck wrote:
The snip & sketch tool in Win10 (Shift+Window+S keystroke shortcut) is
very handy for grabbing a quick screen shot you can paste into your
email or chat.
Since FF is your main browser, assuming it's a recent version, try using right click on a screen, then using "Take a Screenshot" (or try the default shortcut - CTRL+Shift+S [customizable].)? You do need to be careful that you're not within something like the reply window, but it will allow you to capture any part of the screen and will even scroll the window if needed.

Duane
--
The official Groups.io user documentation is in the Groups.io Help Center.
GMF's Unofficial Help Wiki: /g/GroupManagersForum/wiki


Re: 2 accounts open at the same time?

 




<command> <shift> <4> ?then select area to be saved

<command> <shift> <4> ?saves entire screen (including stuff you might not weant to show so be careful)


Patti


Re: 2 accounts open at the same time?

 



The snip & sketch tool in Win10 (Shift+Window+S keystroke shortcut) is
very handy for grabbing a quick screen shot you can paste into your
email or chat. Now if only it had a feature to draw straight arrows
(something I have a hard time with via mouse).

Rather than the Windows-10 snip function, I find the free version of "picpick" windows application to be preferred.
  • It can be set to start from a user defined keyboard hot-key
  • It has more options for method what and how to capture including a scrolling screen function that will scroll the current window copying the entire content rather than just the current screen content. (I have not found any other software to do that.)
  • The captured shot is then presented in a graphic editor similar to MS Paint where you can edit if needed.
  • You can also simply paste it into your desired location or save it as a file.
I have no interest in the program, other than finding it the most useful free utility for the purpose.

K4HM - Hank


Re: Single Owner Group - Owner Deceased

 

In response to Shal and the selection list, I could see the option to create
a owner/moderator in waiting. They would have no active rights but would be
designated for the survivorship rolls.

In response to the list that has very little traffic, I would expect the
first thing the successor code would do is try to contact the current
owners. If that doesn't create a response, then it would go down the list.
This is where having more than one way to contact any owner is critical. As
long as the in or out of band response comes back from the owner, the clock
resets. This could be as little as going to a webpage link and clicking
'here I am'.

-Ken Cameron, Member JMRI Dev Team
www.jmri.org
www.fingerlakeslivesteamers.org
www.cnymod.org
www.syracusemodelrr.org


Re: 2 accounts open at the same time?

 

On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 09:53 PM, Dan Tucker - FireTuck wrote:
three browsers loaded on my MAC
If one of them is Firefox, you might want to try Multi-Account Containers add-in which keeps cookies and session details isolated between (color coded) tabs.? I haven't used it, but others have.? If you prefer separate windows (without the add-on), you can open multiple private windows in FF that won't share information.? That I have done a couple of times.

Duane
--
The official Groups.io user documentation is in the Groups.io Help Center.
GMF's Unofficial Help Wiki: /g/GroupManagersForum/wiki


Re: Single Owner Group - Owner Deceased

 

On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 06:56 AM, txercoupemuseum.org wrote:
Another owner with the same powers I have could cause all kinds of mischief should they prove unworthy of such UNNECESSARY trust.
This is the part that really puzzles me.? You don't trust them now, but would trust them if you weren't around?? So the day after they take control they delete the group?? If they were moderator with all privileges, they could still wreak havoc (remove members, delete files, etc.), but not delete the group.? If you're unsure, you could 'phase in' their control.? In a successor situation, it would be all or nothing.

I've never met most of the people on my groups, but have asked some of them to be moderator/owner.? (That's another thing you'd need to deal with, many don't want to be owner/moderator.)? Shal and I have never met in person, but for some reason he has trusted me to be a co-owner of a couple of groups that he founded.? Obviously I'd like to feel he made a good choice and will do my best to earn that trust. ;>)

Duane
--
The official Groups.io user documentation is in the Groups.io Help Center.
GMF's Unofficial Help Wiki: /g/GroupManagersForum/wiki


Re: Single Owner Group - Owner Deceased

 

On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 11:34 PM, Art Kocsis wrote:


On 01-13-2021 17:16, ro-esp wrote:
... maybe just allow succession-requests no sooner than when the
original owner has not been active in any group for 2 or 3 months,
and have them step in to ask the group whether anybody has
objections to promoting the moderator to owner
That is not practical. My groups operated on Yahoo for years without
any owner activity (a feat, unfortunately, unable to be achieved on
GIO!). While not the most active, we had 3000 members, no moderation
required and no problems with SPAM. Absence of owner activity is not
a reliable indicator of an owner's vitality. In fact, even on GIO,
all moderation/administration requirements could be performed by
separate moderators without any owner activity required at all.
you seem to have misinterpreted what I said

Validating the death of an owner, given that he/she could have lived
anyplace on the world and is only identified by an email address may
just be an intractable problem.
That's why I suggested that an owner be considered permanently incapacitated only when (s)he hasn't sent a message or done any moderating-tasks in groups.io at all. I am not suggesting that groups.io-staff limit their view to just one group. Obviously if the missed owner is still active in another group, (s)he isn't dead and no succession-procedure is warranted

groetjes/?is, Ronaldo


Re: Single Owner Group - Owner Deceased

 

Personally I haven't seen any discouragement by moderators, far from it, just the opposite in fact

This group ownership subject seems to be a pre-occupation of ex Yahoo groups

Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK)

On 14/01/2021 23:11, Shal Farley wrote:
WRB,

> Moderator opinions have, in my opinion, unduly discouraged earlier
> discussions on this subject.? Shouldn¡¯t they encourage legitimate
> discussions rather than discourage them?
It is unnecessary, and unwise, to assume suppression by the moderators when what you really face is a difference of opinion with an individual member (who happens to be a moderator). Assuming an adversarial stance is not conducive to an open conversation about the issues.
We try to ensure that postings we make as individual members are signed only with our names, and when speaking as "the moderators" (which is quite rare, on-list) are signed with our title as well.
Shal
GMF Founder


Re: 2 accounts open at the same time?

 

On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 01:51 AM, Niman H wrote:
Is there a way to have 2 or more accounts (ie, email addresses, I think that's the right term) open on gio at one time? It would be helpful to have a moderator and regular member account open at the same time to see how different settings are affected, etc, instead of having to log in and out (and in and out).
Hi Niman,

See my previous post on this subject /g/GroupManagersForum/message/33488

Regards
Andy


Re: Single Owner Group - Owner Deceased

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Hi Duane,

My pleasure. ?

It isn¡¯t a matter of ¡°can¡¯t¡±, but of ¡°won¡¯t. ?If you have lots of people in your groups you would trust with their continuity, consider yourself lucky. ?I don¡¯t, perhaps because I set a very high bar to insure the survival of ¡°my groups¡± (in the custodial sense) started in the ¡®90s.

I wouldn¡¯t give a neighbor I really don¡¯t know very well the keys to my house, nor would I convey the ¡°keys to the kingdom¡± of my groups easily, since they presently would concurrently convey the power to demote ME, present sole owner, at a time I DO NOT WISH TO RETIRE. ?

Another owner with the same powers I have could cause all kinds of mischief should they prove unworthy of such UNNECESSARY trust. ?For ?those reasons I¡¯m simply NOT EVER going to use ¡°existing features¡± clearly inappropriate to my needs and an unnecessary threat to the continuity of my groups (a primary responsibility of any leader worth of the title). ?

I WANT to have one or more designated successors, but I have NO intention of handing over powers unnecessary at present before I am ready to "hand over the reins¡±, incapacitated, or dead.

In my local county ordinary people are appointed to an Appraisal Review Board who have never had power of any sort before. ?Instead of remaining ¡°peers¡± of taxpayers, they come to see themselves as an extension of the appraisal district; with impartiality the first victim. ?

Having power for the first time in their lives goes to their heads. ?As the saying goes, Power corrupts. ?Absolute power corrupts absolutely. ?Human nature.

Best! ?

WRB

¡ª?

On Jan 14, 2021, at 4:44 PM, Duane <txpigeon@...> wrote:

On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 04:24 PM, wrote:
You¡¯re ¡°...just not seeing a problem here¡­¡± because FOR YOU with YOUR group¡¯s resources, it¡¯s NOT a problem. ?With all due respect, that is no reason to dismiss out of hand the fact that this IS A PROBLEM for some owners and insuring continuity in case of their death or disability.
I'm not dismissing them out of hand.? Please explain in detail why you can't use the existing features.? (Have you tried them?)? I'd really like to understand why making changes would improve things.? My groups have no more resources than any other group and will survive fine, even if I don't appoint a co-owner, since the moderator(s) can carry on.

Duane
--
The official user documentation is in the Groups.io Help Center.
GMF's Unofficial Help Wiki: /g/GroupManagersForum/wiki



Re: Single Owner Group - Owner Deceased

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Hi Shal,

Comments below in bold and ¡°< >¡±.

Best!

WRB

On Jan 14, 2021, at 5:54 PM, Shal Farley <shals2nd@...> wrote:

WRB,

> Shouldn¡¯t that be ¡°outbound email¡±, as in ¡°owner-originated¡±?

Er, perspective again. I meant inbound to (the entity measuring the activity).

Specifically I wanted to exclude from "activity" any of the normal group traffic or moderator notices which may continue to be delivered successfully to an owner's address regardless of whether the owner is still able to read them.

<Makes sense now.>

>> 3) In the event that any owner or any moderator tagged for succession
>> is individually absent (as defined above) send a notification ...
>
> In such case, or if the designated ¡°new Owner¡± declines advancement,
> just go to the next in line?

I was thinking of (3) as a kind of early warning system that the chain of succession may need attention. It wouldn't necessarily signify that a succession event has occurred. For example, if there were other active owners no promotion would occur and it would be up to them to decide what to do under the circumstances.

If the group had a single owner, and it was that owner who went absent, then the rules of succession would be in play and the first in line would be promoted. That person would "accept" the promotion by picking up the reins. Otherwise he/she can explicitly decline advancement by promoting someone else (mayhaps the next in line) and demoting him/herself. Or remain absent and the mechanism moves on to the next.

<Agree completely.>

> I don¡¯t think a ¡°chain of succession¡± is desirable. ?Once an owner is
> replaced by someone willing and competent, after six months or a year
> it should then be THEIR prerogative to designate their own successor
> candidate(s).

I was thinking it was their prerogative to immediately reshape the "chain" (or even turn the mechanism off altogether) as soon as he/she is promoted. I only made the mechanism capable of chaining in case the immediate successor also went absent (pre- or post-promotion).

<Works for me.>

> The perpetual ¡°Con" of learning from experience is that the exam comes
> before the knowledge ?;<)

Too true. Which is why a stint as an active moderator before being promoted to Owner is a useful practice. That's part of why I proposed a mechanism that only applies to moderators in the chain of succession.

<In my opinion a successor should be a?¡°person in waiting¡±, a?¡°fallback in case something happens to a normally functioning founder or single owner. ?I?oppose the idea of multiple owners as?¡°unnatural¡±, i.e. wolf packs don¡¯t have TWO?¡°alpha males¡± simultaneously?¡°in charge¡±. ?I¡¯m not opposed to the idea of appointing a?¡°springing¡± successor from my moderators, but the person I presently deem most qualified to lead my groups in the long term has not yet been made a moderator.> ?

>> o ?Doesn't provide for alternate outcomes (group locked or deleted).
>
> Offer the latter [two] as optional checkboxes?

<These two?¡°options¡± merely provide for ratification of a leader¡¯s failure to provide a future for their group. ?Hitler ordered Paris destroyed by his administrators in the field (they refused) and tried to take Germany down with him as?¡°undeserving¡± of continuing to exist. ?Not?something to encourage. ?That said, all such options should be discussed.>

It could be done, particularly easy if the controls are aggregated into a single tab in the Settings page. I forgot "remove everyone" from that list.

Shal



Re: Single Owner Group - Owner Deceased

 

On 14/01/2021 07:56, Shal Farley wrote:

1) Add an "Owner Succession" panel to each moderator's page, just below the Moderator Permissions panel. This panel would be accessible only by owners, not by any moderators.
2) In this panel place a checkbox for "Promote this moderator to owner in the event of absence of any owner. Place a second control to define how long an absence triggers succession.
For this purpose I'd define absence as being no activity by any owner's account (either web activity or inbound email).
I setup a list here, purely to serve as a "contact support" function, for templates I've created. Two or three years can go by, without any messages on it. (As much as I'd like to think that nobody has questions about using the templates, I suspect the truth is that nobody uses them.)

If I understand the proposal correctly, the list would be transferred to the appointed person, even if I was still alive and kicking, simply due to the low traffic of the list. That doesn't seem right to me.

#####

For Premium & Enterprise lists, require both a mailing address, and a phone number. There are three circumstances under which the "owner succession" goes into effect:
* A death certificate for the owner is submitted to Mark/Groups.io;
* An "owner succession" vote, in which at least 50% +1 of the list subscribers vote for it to be used;
* A request from the legal guardian of the owner is submitted to mark/Groups.io. (This is to cover scenarios in which the owner is no longer able to run the list, or transfer the list to another party. By way of example, rapid onset of dementia. I haven't thought through the protocol for Mark/Groups.IO to utilize, to verify the authenticity of the request. (^1))

For Basic lists, the "owner succession" kicks in, upon 50% +1 members votes for it to do so;

#####

^1: Given the ease in which a death certificate for somebody who is still living, can be obtained in India, I suspect that false claims of legal guardianship can easily obtained, both there, and elsewhere.

jonathon