开云体育

How does the "Unmoderate after xx approved posts" feature work when a user is Override: Moderated later? One of my groups is "Unmoderate after 2 approved posts". I Override: Moderated one user and

J I use this setting for all my groups. I've not had any complaints. We see very few posts come in with stuff left behind and those are handled properly by the system - the trail doesn't appear in

I'm estimating the error rate at approximately 0.01%. That's about the frequency in my own group. Your argument for getting rid of the feature is, and has always been, entirely based on your notion

Off with my head! Louise

Shal, I was 99% sure of this before, but I have now explicitly tested it in my test group: contents within top-post generated ellipses are excluded from search results. J

Actually, once provided: * If the tool is not robust, and the consensus is that it is wanted, it must be made robust. * If the tool is not robust, and the consensus is that it is not necessary and

Brian, I couldn't agree with you more about learning and adhering to group culture in whatever situation you're in. But the group culture HERE is that the system puts prior posts into trailing

You're quite welcome. I am actually hoping that Mark does eventually make it such that you can mark a single post or contiguous series of posts embedded within a thread for excision where the part of

And, J, who else but the composer should be held responsible for their composition? He's (and I'm) holding them responsible while you're handing them a workaround that shouldn't be needed in the first

Louise, Are you using plain-text email? If so, this result (the fact that all the trailing posts are included on the site) support my theory that the top-posting algorithm fails with plain-text email.

LeeAnne, Glad you got it straightened out. Here is the thread in beta about partial splitting that Brian was referring to: /g/beta/message/12216 (

I am deliberately not going to use that method now to see /show how all of the quoted text from the various authors now returns to everyone. Although I was able to distinguish Shal's words from mine

Hi J, That is what I did - now I did try it again in a different group and it worked fine so maybe I made a mistake the first time. ? Just to be clear, Post A was the calendar notice. ?Post B was

Shal, it is excluded from the search. J Sent from my iPhone

X, Your logic is backwards. You are the one blaming the users. J Sent from my iPhone

Xaun, Ok, that was a fail. I was able to edit it after posting to put the line breaks back. I'll leave it to you whether you want to continue your message where I cut it, or delete the whole thing and

[ mod note: lets see if I can edit this without collapsing it into a single mashed-together paragraph. Xuan, you may want to delete and re-post this if it gets smashed into illegibility. ]

J, I think this assertion may need some testing. I don't know that the text hidden under the ellipses button is actually excluded from search (and would be a little surprised if it is). The Groups.io

Brian, That's a fine contention, but for most groups it probably isn't actionable. That is, the group managers wouldn't likely consider banning the use of mobile device email interfaces to interact

Brian, I think we're agreed on this. I just find it far easier to accomplish in a plain text compose window. That may in part be due to my choice of email interface (Thunderbird). Meh. It is rare that