开云体育

I have that disabled for my groups. You are only allowed to post to the group on the website, you may not reply to all, or do a private reply. Now in the email interface you can as you can see the

If you mean the footer, you can actually type in custom text in the settings under groups.io <http://groups.io/> under your group, then admin, then settings. I just modified my android list to list

I am wondering if anyone can help me and the people on my Women Writers through the Ages listserv at Yahoo. We are now in the third day, more than 48 hours, of no messages coming into or being sent

Hello I am looking to move several announcement groups from Yahoo to here. These are mostly e-mail announcement lists, with a couple as discussion groups. The members of the groups are not

Richard, There is, sort-of, for a loose meaning of the word private. If you click on Reply under a member's post there is a "Private" button over to the right. Clicking that will change a default

Ok thanks, I’ve done that. Sent: 21 November 2017 15:51 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [GMF] Member list vs. member directory

When NextDoor started someone called me repeatedly to get me to join. I didn’t for several reasons. They were pushing security and guaranteeing that no one would be on the list unless they were

I think this is so comprehensive and straightforward that you should repeat this wishlist to the beta group, which is the place for new feature suggestions. Some of these have been discussed there ad

Shal Sorry, I didn't intend to add any more to this topic but I just want to clarify something that was a misunderstanding on my part. I am (and always was) perfectly happy with the distinction

My list that had 33,000 members when it was on Yahoo was a technical support group for an online broker's application programming interface: this is something that enables people to develop financial

Having been through similar discussions (debates?;) ad infinitum in the beta group over the past 1+ years, it's become more and more clear to me how idiosyncratic these preferences are. On one end,

Sharon, I think it is entirely a question of the nature of the group. For some types of help groups I think it would be entirely appropriate to allow (or even require) anonymity. For my classmate

Richard, I don't think it is, primarily. I think the two features come from different needs. The Members list comes about from the list admin's need to have a comprehensive list of the membership,

I can’t imagine a list with anonymous members posting. I have a 3,000 member neighborhood list and it starts a big row if people don’t sign their emails and indicate the street on which they live.

Shal I understand everything you say, and where you're coming from, but as things stand I really don't think the distinction between the member list and the directory can be considered a privacy

J, You can turn it off in your group if you don't mind allowing members to see the Members list. I've done that in my classmate groups. I think that's relatively safe on groups with restricted (and

Richard, Or members on bouncing status. Those too do not transfer over. Shal

Richard, That's basically in the nature of email lists (as opposed to online fora). There are ways around it, but most email lists operate with the sender's From: address forwarded in the clear. The

I don't think what you say is entirely true. Before I moved my groups from Yahoo, there were many instances of members who had no declared email address at all, but were perfectly able to post. This

Shal (and others who responded, for which thanks) I think what concerns me here is that on the one hand, there is this distinction between the member directory and member list (which of course was the