开云体育

Personally, I think this would be the solution to most of our problems with multiple images Shal - identify an unwanted image, do a kind of "select all" on it, delete. Problem solved! Martin. Mark

Judy, Sounds like your group could really use a means to identify signature images and consolidate or delete them. Something like an image search, where you can do a bulk operation on the result.

Francis, I think you don't realize that the recipient doesn't even have to mark the a message from the group as spam.? The recipient's email service might actually do this also and the intendended

After reading the initial post about this problem, I went and checked our photos and there were over 36,000 of them. I spent six hours yesterday deleting garbage. The family photos I'm trying to

You are right. I was thinking that for our group, simply opting out of automated posting to the photos folder would eliminate the duplication problem before it started. I expect most things that will

Marv, I saw that in beta@ and may comment on it. However I'm not sure it addresses Martin's issue, which was primarily with an multitude of copies on an image from a member's message signature. If I'm

My suggestion is an option in the user profile like "Do not save graphics in my posts to the group pictures folder." For my group, I would like this to be the default, but other groups may be

Martin, Oops. So I see two problems here. That's one of them. We don't have that feature yet. The other is how to automatically detect such signature images and not store them individually, both to

Jennifer, Thanks for the reminder: I've been meaning to look into this for my PTA group. In my case the fee isn't directly associated with the Groups.io group, being on the email list is just a

Simon, We (fellow GMF members) don't need to see the whole message, and in particular don't need and shouldn't be shown any of your original message content (the text you meant to have posted on the

Jonathan, Maybe. That will depend on your email service, the list service, and on how you've configured Thunderbird. Some webmail services (including big ones like gmail) have an arrangement where

Fri, 22 Dec 2017 16:44:21 -0600, "Jonathan Sivier" <jsivier@...>, wrote: Maybe the individual in question is not using an offline eMail client but uses her/his ISP's web interface. Arno

At the very least it send a message back to the server that handles the person's emails. And there is a protocol that requires that server to stop sending messages to the destination that marked the

Yes, you need to warn group members. I think most of us do that periodically or in the welcome letter. J Sent from my iPhone [excess quote trimmed by moderator]

Does this mean that when I mark a message as spam on my email program (Thunderbird) it automatically sends a message back to the sender with the information that I marked the message as spam, and if

J.? Have any of those commenting done a Google Search on Jennifer Christian, MD, MPH?? Wish I had her credentials! Medical Doctor, Master of Public Health. There is no real difference between using

Yes, it does give me details. Sent: Friday, December 22, 2017 5:10 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [GMF] Remote SMTP Server Returned: 500 Invalid request Nonsense. Outlook doesn't

David and others - Thank you for pointing out the issues – and yes I have been thinking this through for a long while.? ? *Vocabulary causes confusion*.? Mark’s decision to use the word

simply put . . . if you mark a message as SPAM . . . the future messages are blocked from "you", not to prevent the sender from sending . . . I've often get messages marked as possible spam, marked by

I have one group that is only open to members of a club that charges dues.? All of the subscribing and other information is done totally separate from the group.? The group is for pretty much